Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study

Introduction: To improve the continuity of care for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in peripheral areas, collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists is needed. This pragmatic non-randomized interventional study assesses feasibility and effectiveness of a new primar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebecca Tomaschek, Dima Touhami, Stefan Essig, Armin Gemperli
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ef011682ddab4dcf99cefabd26037210
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ef011682ddab4dcf99cefabd26037210
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ef011682ddab4dcf99cefabd260372102021-11-24T04:32:44ZShared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study2451-865410.1016/j.conctc.2021.100873https://doaj.org/article/ef011682ddab4dcf99cefabd260372102021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865421001733https://doaj.org/toc/2451-8654Introduction: To improve the continuity of care for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in peripheral areas, collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists is needed. This pragmatic non-randomized interventional study assesses feasibility and effectiveness of a new primary care model based on this collaboration. Methods: The intervention is medical education on SCI related topics offered by specialists to GPs practicing in rural areas. Outcomes are assessed and analyzed in physicians and patients. Group allocation of persons with SCI follows intention-to-treat principle with intervention group being those in close proximity to a participating GP. Results: It is expected that ten GPs and sixteen specialists will take part in the study's intervention. An average difference in “Doctor's opinion on collaboration questionnaire” score (mean 44; SD ± 12) from baseline after two years post-intervention in the group of participating GPs is hypothesized at P-value level <0.05; meanwhile, the control group remains at an average score of 56. Of persons with SCI (n = 395), 230 are expected to take part in the study at baseline. An average modified “Spinal Cord Injury-Secondary Conditions Scale” change in score from baseline to 24 months post intervention is expected to fall from 12.0 to 9.0 in the intervention group and to stay at 12.0 in the control group. Conclusion: The study aims to improve patients' outcomes and providers’ experience with delivery of care for persons with SCI, as compared to current best practice. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04071938. Registered August 28, 2018, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04071938.Rebecca TomaschekDima TouhamiStefan EssigArmin GemperliElsevierarticlePrimary careModel of careCollaborationGeneral practitionersSpecialistsSpinal cord injuryMedicine (General)R5-920ENContemporary Clinical Trials Communications, Vol 24, Iss , Pp 100873- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Primary care
Model of care
Collaboration
General practitioners
Specialists
Spinal cord injury
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Primary care
Model of care
Collaboration
General practitioners
Specialists
Spinal cord injury
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Rebecca Tomaschek
Dima Touhami
Stefan Essig
Armin Gemperli
Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
description Introduction: To improve the continuity of care for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in peripheral areas, collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists is needed. This pragmatic non-randomized interventional study assesses feasibility and effectiveness of a new primary care model based on this collaboration. Methods: The intervention is medical education on SCI related topics offered by specialists to GPs practicing in rural areas. Outcomes are assessed and analyzed in physicians and patients. Group allocation of persons with SCI follows intention-to-treat principle with intervention group being those in close proximity to a participating GP. Results: It is expected that ten GPs and sixteen specialists will take part in the study's intervention. An average difference in “Doctor's opinion on collaboration questionnaire” score (mean 44; SD ± 12) from baseline after two years post-intervention in the group of participating GPs is hypothesized at P-value level <0.05; meanwhile, the control group remains at an average score of 56. Of persons with SCI (n = 395), 230 are expected to take part in the study at baseline. An average modified “Spinal Cord Injury-Secondary Conditions Scale” change in score from baseline to 24 months post intervention is expected to fall from 12.0 to 9.0 in the intervention group and to stay at 12.0 in the control group. Conclusion: The study aims to improve patients' outcomes and providers’ experience with delivery of care for persons with SCI, as compared to current best practice. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04071938. Registered August 28, 2018, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04071938.
format article
author Rebecca Tomaschek
Dima Touhami
Stefan Essig
Armin Gemperli
author_facet Rebecca Tomaschek
Dima Touhami
Stefan Essig
Armin Gemperli
author_sort Rebecca Tomaschek
title Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_short Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_full Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_fullStr Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_full_unstemmed Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
title_sort shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ef011682ddab4dcf99cefabd26037210
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccatomaschek sharedresponsibilitybetweengeneralpractitionersandhighlyspecializedphysiciansinchronicspinalcordinjurystudyprotocolforanationwidepragmaticnonrandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT dimatouhami sharedresponsibilitybetweengeneralpractitionersandhighlyspecializedphysiciansinchronicspinalcordinjurystudyprotocolforanationwidepragmaticnonrandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT stefanessig sharedresponsibilitybetweengeneralpractitionersandhighlyspecializedphysiciansinchronicspinalcordinjurystudyprotocolforanationwidepragmaticnonrandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT armingemperli sharedresponsibilitybetweengeneralpractitionersandhighlyspecializedphysiciansinchronicspinalcordinjurystudyprotocolforanationwidepragmaticnonrandomizedinterventionalstudy
_version_ 1718416011393236992