New cine magnetic resonance imaging parameters for the differential diagnosis of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction
Abstract Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is a severe and refractory intestinal motility disorder whose diagnosis currently relies on subjective imaging assessments. Cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may potentially improve the quantitative analysis of gastrointestinal motility; howe...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ef25ffa2c9734293ba0f8d7f97b4777a |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Abstract Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is a severe and refractory intestinal motility disorder whose diagnosis currently relies on subjective imaging assessments. Cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may potentially improve the quantitative analysis of gastrointestinal motility; however, suitable CIPO detection parameters should be determined. Cine MRI was performed in seven patients with CIPO and 11 healthy controls. The logarithm of the Mahalanobis distance (x1) and distance variation per time (x2) were used as the original parameters to determine CIPO diagnostic thresholds. Furthermore, the correlation between cine MRI findings and CIPO severity was investigated. Threshold values of α = 1.10 and β = 0.15 for x1 and x2, respectively, produced a CIPO diagnosis sensitivity of 1.00 (7/7) and specificity of 0.82 (9/11). The resulting error was 0.11 (2/18). The two parameters were correlated (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: − 0.52). Any of the intestinal tracts of patients with severe CIPO requiring home parenteral nutrition belonged to the region defined by x1 ≥ 1.10 and x2 ≤ 0.15. Cine MRI is effective for the quantitative evaluation of small intestinal motility and CIPO diagnosis when using the abovementioned parameters and can be useful for treatment decision-making. However, these parameters have a wide distribution in healthy volunteers; this may complicate the detection of other disorders. |
|---|