Finkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence

Commentary: After all the overheated rhetoric over the Finkelstein Report, it may be an anti-climax to know that the key issue is the right of reply, or the right of redress, to those who feel they have been misrepresented in the news. Such processes are now done through self-regulation by the Austr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Rodney Tiffen
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Asia Pacific Network 2012
Materias:	Accountability Australia Censorship Corruption Ethics Finkelstein Inquiry Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ef3283378fb0433aac32f2719800dcc6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ef3283378fb0433aac32f2719800dcc6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ef3283378fb0433aac32f2719800dcc62021-12-02T03:41:02ZFinkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence10.24135/pjr.v18i2.2611023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/ef3283378fb0433aac32f2719800dcc62012-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/261https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035Commentary: After all the overheated rhetoric over the Finkelstein Report, it may be an anti-climax to know that the key issue is the right of reply, or the right of redress, to those who feel they have been misrepresented in the news. Such processes are now done through self-regulation by the Australian Press Council, while the Finkelstein Report sees this as insufficiently effective and recommends a government-funded statutory agency.Rodney TiffenAsia Pacific NetworkarticleAccountabilityAustraliaCensorshipCorruptionEthicsFinkelstein InquiryCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 18, Iss 2 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Accountability Australia Censorship Corruption Ethics Finkelstein Inquiry Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650
spellingShingle	Accountability Australia Censorship Corruption Ethics Finkelstein Inquiry Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 Rodney Tiffen Finkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence
description	Commentary: After all the overheated rhetoric over the Finkelstein Report, it may be an anti-climax to know that the key issue is the right of reply, or the right of redress, to those who feel they have been misrepresented in the news. Such processes are now done through self-regulation by the Australian Press Council, while the Finkelstein Report sees this as insufficiently effective and recommends a government-funded statutory agency.
format	article
author	Rodney Tiffen
author_facet	Rodney Tiffen
author_sort	Rodney Tiffen
title	Finkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence
title_short	Finkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence
title_full	Finkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence
title_fullStr	Finkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence
title_full_unstemmed	Finkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence
title_sort	finkelstein report: volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence
publisher	Asia Pacific Network
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/ef3283378fb0433aac32f2719800dcc6
work_keys_str_mv	AT rodneytiffen finkelsteinreportvolumeofmediavitriolininverseproportiontoamountofevidence
_version_	1718401706771873792

Finkelstein Report: Volume of media vitriol in inverse proportion to amount of evidence

Ejemplares similares