La reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?

This article contributes to the discussion about environmental capital through the lens of “local” user position in protected areas. More precisely, it focuses on French national parks, emblematic of the conception of nature conservation in France. Indigenous uses and “local” environmental knowledge...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bruno Bouet, Ludovic Ginelli, Valérie Deldrève
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2018
Materias:	French national parks Reunion Island Marseille Creeks environmental capital indigenousness capital environmental inequality Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ef6bde72bc174993b4289287a3ef8e70
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ef6bde72bc174993b4289287a3ef8e70
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ef6bde72bc174993b4289287a3ef8e702021-12-02T10:01:46ZLa reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?1492-844210.4000/vertigo.19025https://doaj.org/article/ef6bde72bc174993b4289287a3ef8e702018-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/19025https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442This article contributes to the discussion about environmental capital through the lens of “local” user position in protected areas. More precisely, it focuses on French national parks, emblematic of the conception of nature conservation in France. Indigenous uses and “local” environmental knowledge were denied in the first national parks in former colonies and metropolitan France. But they are currently reintroduced in the context of the parks reform (2006) and the international background of participatory imperative, indigenous recognition and ecologization of the thought (Mormont, 2009 ; 2013). Is this movement like a recognition of an environmental capital for “local” users ? This hypothesis may be discussed. Under which conditions are these knowledge and uses recognized by the ecological vision, which is usually dominant in French national parks ? Who does participate in and benefit from this recognition ? Focusing on the cases of the young national park of Creeks (2012) and of Reunion Island (2007), we outline the components of environmental capital granted to “local” users in French national parks, by analyzing the combined effects of indigenousness capital recognition and ecological imperative. To what extent does this process broaden the definition of the “publics” of protected areas users and who does remain excluded ?Bruno BouetLudovic GinelliValérie DeldrèveÉditions en environnement VertigOarticleFrench national parksReunion IslandMarseille Creeksenvironmental capitalindigenousness capitalenvironmental inequalityEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 29 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	French national parks Reunion Island Marseille Creeks environmental capital indigenousness capital environmental inequality Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	French national parks Reunion Island Marseille Creeks environmental capital indigenousness capital environmental inequality Environmental sciences GE1-350 Bruno Bouet Ludovic Ginelli Valérie Deldrève La reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?
description	This article contributes to the discussion about environmental capital through the lens of “local” user position in protected areas. More precisely, it focuses on French national parks, emblematic of the conception of nature conservation in France. Indigenous uses and “local” environmental knowledge were denied in the first national parks in former colonies and metropolitan France. But they are currently reintroduced in the context of the parks reform (2006) and the international background of participatory imperative, indigenous recognition and ecologization of the thought (Mormont, 2009 ; 2013). Is this movement like a recognition of an environmental capital for “local” users ? This hypothesis may be discussed. Under which conditions are these knowledge and uses recognized by the ecological vision, which is usually dominant in French national parks ? Who does participate in and benefit from this recognition ? Focusing on the cases of the young national park of Creeks (2012) and of Reunion Island (2007), we outline the components of environmental capital granted to “local” users in French national parks, by analyzing the combined effects of indigenousness capital recognition and ecological imperative. To what extent does this process broaden the definition of the “publics” of protected areas users and who does remain excluded ?
format	article
author	Bruno Bouet Ludovic Ginelli Valérie Deldrève
author_facet	Bruno Bouet Ludovic Ginelli Valérie Deldrève
author_sort	Bruno Bouet
title	La reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?
title_short	La reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?
title_full	La reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?
title_fullStr	La reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?
title_full_unstemmed	La reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?
title_sort	la reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/ef6bde72bc174993b4289287a3ef8e70
work_keys_str_mv	AT brunobouet lareconnaissanceduncapitalenvironnementalautochtone AT ludovicginelli lareconnaissanceduncapitalenvironnementalautochtone AT valeriedeldreve lareconnaissanceduncapitalenvironnementalautochtone
_version_	1718397797383798784

La reconnaissance d’un capital environnemental autochtone ?

Ejemplares similares