Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.

<h4>Objective</h4>Newborn bloodspot screening is an internationally established public health measure. Despite this, there is a paucity of information relating to the decision-making process that parents go through when accepting newborn screening. This is important as screening panels a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stuart G Nicholls, Kevin W Southern
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ef791228d05d416fb6a102bfbb03040e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ef791228d05d416fb6a102bfbb03040e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ef791228d05d416fb6a102bfbb03040e2021-11-18T08:47:15ZParental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0079441https://doaj.org/article/ef791228d05d416fb6a102bfbb03040e2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24265771/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objective</h4>Newborn bloodspot screening is an internationally established public health measure. Despite this, there is a paucity of information relating to the decision-making process that parents go through when accepting newborn screening. This is important as screening panels are expanding; potentially leading to an increasing amount of complex information. This study sought to understand the factors that influence parental decisions and roles they play in the decision-making process.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Qualitative thematic evaluation of semi structured interviews with parents whose children had recently undergone newborn screening in the Merseyside and Cheshire region of England, UK.<h4>Results</h4>Eighteen interviews with first time parents (n = 12) and those with previous children (n = 6). Seven factors were identified as being either explicitly or implicitly related to parental decision-making: Experience, Attitudes to medicine, Information-seeking behaviour, Perceived knowledge, Attitudes to screening, and Perceived choice, all of which ultimately impact on Perceived decisional quality.<h4>Conclusions</h4>These results indicate that while content is important, other contextual factors such as personal experience, perceived choice, and general attitudes toward medicine, are also highly influential. In particular, relationships with key healthcare professionals are central to information collection, attitudes toward screening, and the level of deliberation that is invested in decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening.Stuart G NichollsKevin W SouthernPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 11, p e79441 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Stuart G Nicholls
Kevin W Southern
Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.
description <h4>Objective</h4>Newborn bloodspot screening is an internationally established public health measure. Despite this, there is a paucity of information relating to the decision-making process that parents go through when accepting newborn screening. This is important as screening panels are expanding; potentially leading to an increasing amount of complex information. This study sought to understand the factors that influence parental decisions and roles they play in the decision-making process.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Qualitative thematic evaluation of semi structured interviews with parents whose children had recently undergone newborn screening in the Merseyside and Cheshire region of England, UK.<h4>Results</h4>Eighteen interviews with first time parents (n = 12) and those with previous children (n = 6). Seven factors were identified as being either explicitly or implicitly related to parental decision-making: Experience, Attitudes to medicine, Information-seeking behaviour, Perceived knowledge, Attitudes to screening, and Perceived choice, all of which ultimately impact on Perceived decisional quality.<h4>Conclusions</h4>These results indicate that while content is important, other contextual factors such as personal experience, perceived choice, and general attitudes toward medicine, are also highly influential. In particular, relationships with key healthcare professionals are central to information collection, attitudes toward screening, and the level of deliberation that is invested in decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening.
format article
author Stuart G Nicholls
Kevin W Southern
author_facet Stuart G Nicholls
Kevin W Southern
author_sort Stuart G Nicholls
title Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.
title_short Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.
title_full Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.
title_fullStr Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.
title_full_unstemmed Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.
title_sort parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/ef791228d05d416fb6a102bfbb03040e
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartgnicholls parentaldecisionmakingandacceptanceofnewbornbloodspotscreeninganexploratorystudy
AT kevinwsouthern parentaldecisionmakingandacceptanceofnewbornbloodspotscreeninganexploratorystudy
_version_ 1718421358704066560