Investigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility

Narratives about infertility, diagnosis and treatment interferences are as old as human history. The review of infertility literature showed that the main object of infertility were women and as usual male infertility kept as an hidden subject. In literature male factor infertility studied in physi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Zihniye Okray
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN TR
Publicado:	Muhammed Yıldız 2019
Materias:	Male Factor Infertility Projective Tests TAT Rorscach Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f022caa4b2094bb09c2b5db9d64b325c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f022caa4b2094bb09c2b5db9d64b325c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f022caa4b2094bb09c2b5db9d64b325c2021-12-02T09:35:05ZInvestigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility10.31461/ybpd.5398022587-15362587-1536https://doaj.org/article/f022caa4b2094bb09c2b5db9d64b325c2019-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/720750https://doaj.org/toc/2587-1536https://doaj.org/toc/2587-1536Narratives about infertility, diagnosis and treatment interferences are as old as human history. The review of infertility literature showed that the main object of infertility were women and as usual male infertility kept as an hidden subject. In literature male factor infertility studied in physiological aspects and psychological aspects of it somehow denied. The aim of this is to evaluate two cases with projective techniques (Rorschach Test and TAT-Thematic Apperception Test) in order to see their psychic organizations about infertility. The main findings of the study were the identifications, differences between sexes, and also transgenerational differences could not be clearly identified. The responses to these two projective techniques can be identified as more immature and infanlite althoug their are adults. In other words more infantile identification was made by cases. In both cases, the mother/woman was considered to be as an omnipotent being and on the other hand devalued at the same time which can be considered as ambivalance towards mother/woman. The wording and phrases that are used by these two cases containts too much hesitations and repeteaded words which can be evaluated as immaturity. Both of the cases do not form a relationship neither with the clinician nor the test material which can be evaluated as a defence mechanism upon both the outer and ther inner world. This study is considered to be an important contribution to the literature because it is the first study conducted -with the knowledge of author- upon male factor infertility. Zihniye OkrayMuhammed YıldızarticleMale Factor InfertilityProjective TestsTATRorscachPsychologyBF1-990ENTRYaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi, Vol 3, Iss 5, Pp 53-64 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN TR
topic	Male Factor Infertility Projective Tests TAT Rorscach Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	Male Factor Infertility Projective Tests TAT Rorscach Psychology BF1-990 Zihniye Okray Investigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility
description	Narratives about infertility, diagnosis and treatment interferences are as old as human history. The review of infertility literature showed that the main object of infertility were women and as usual male infertility kept as an hidden subject. In literature male factor infertility studied in physiological aspects and psychological aspects of it somehow denied. The aim of this is to evaluate two cases with projective techniques (Rorschach Test and TAT-Thematic Apperception Test) in order to see their psychic organizations about infertility. The main findings of the study were the identifications, differences between sexes, and also transgenerational differences could not be clearly identified. The responses to these two projective techniques can be identified as more immature and infanlite althoug their are adults. In other words more infantile identification was made by cases. In both cases, the mother/woman was considered to be as an omnipotent being and on the other hand devalued at the same time which can be considered as ambivalance towards mother/woman. The wording and phrases that are used by these two cases containts too much hesitations and repeteaded words which can be evaluated as immaturity. Both of the cases do not form a relationship neither with the clinician nor the test material which can be evaluated as a defence mechanism upon both the outer and ther inner world. This study is considered to be an important contribution to the literature because it is the first study conducted -with the knowledge of author- upon male factor infertility.
format	article
author	Zihniye Okray
author_facet	Zihniye Okray
author_sort	Zihniye Okray
title	Investigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility
title_short	Investigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility
title_full	Investigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility
title_fullStr	Investigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility
title_full_unstemmed	Investigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility
title_sort	investigation of tat and rorschach responses of males who are facing with male factor infertility
publisher	Muhammed Yıldız
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/f022caa4b2094bb09c2b5db9d64b325c
work_keys_str_mv	AT zihniyeokray investigationoftatandrorschachresponsesofmaleswhoarefacingwithmalefactorinfertility
_version_	1718398097625710592

Investigation of TAT and Rorschach Responses of Males Who are Facing with Male Factor Infertility

Ejemplares similares