Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC

This study presents the development and content validation of an instrument assessing the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. The study consists of three stages: (i) Selection and definition of the component dimensions and areas, construction of items assessing these dimensions, a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta, Pedro-Ruymán Brito-Brito, Alfonso-Miguel García-Hernández
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f02e8674afb9419bb5dc618935f3247e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f02e8674afb9419bb5dc618935f3247e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f02e8674afb9419bb5dc618935f3247e2021-11-25T17:44:12ZDevelopment and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC10.3390/healthcare91114592227-9032https://doaj.org/article/f02e8674afb9419bb5dc618935f3247e2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/11/1459https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9032This study presents the development and content validation of an instrument assessing the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. The study consists of three stages: (i) Selection and definition of the component dimensions and areas, construction of items assessing these dimensions, administration instructions, and qualitative criteria for assigning diagnoses; (ii) Face validity and content validity; (iii) Pilot test. The tentative questionnaire was designed using two defining characteristics of the NANDA-I (“Impaired verbal communication” and “Readiness for enhanced communication”) and the NOC outcome indicators “Communication”, “Communication: Expressive”, “Communication: Receptive”, and “Information Processing”. The areas and items reached initial content validity index (CVI) and representativeness index (RI) values of 0.87 and above. Those that did not reach the expected values were modified after expert review. The resulting questionnaire was pilot-tested for feasibility and administration times. An instrument containing five dimensions, fourteen areas, and 43 items was obtained and administered in 15 (12–31) minutes. A panel of experts evaluated the final questionnaire (CEECCA), awarding its areas and items CVI and RI values of 0.90 and above. In the absence of further psychometric studies, the questionnaire appears to be useful for assessing ability to communicate in individuals with aphasia.Willian-Jesús Martín-DortaPedro-Ruymán Brito-BritoAlfonso-Miguel García-HernándezMDPI AGarticleaphasianursing assessmentstandardized nursing terminologyvalidation studiessurveys and questionnairesMedicineRENHealthcare, Vol 9, Iss 1459, p 1459 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic aphasia
nursing assessment
standardized nursing terminology
validation studies
surveys and questionnaires
Medicine
R
spellingShingle aphasia
nursing assessment
standardized nursing terminology
validation studies
surveys and questionnaires
Medicine
R
Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta
Pedro-Ruymán Brito-Brito
Alfonso-Miguel García-Hernández
Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
description This study presents the development and content validation of an instrument assessing the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. The study consists of three stages: (i) Selection and definition of the component dimensions and areas, construction of items assessing these dimensions, administration instructions, and qualitative criteria for assigning diagnoses; (ii) Face validity and content validity; (iii) Pilot test. The tentative questionnaire was designed using two defining characteristics of the NANDA-I (“Impaired verbal communication” and “Readiness for enhanced communication”) and the NOC outcome indicators “Communication”, “Communication: Expressive”, “Communication: Receptive”, and “Information Processing”. The areas and items reached initial content validity index (CVI) and representativeness index (RI) values of 0.87 and above. Those that did not reach the expected values were modified after expert review. The resulting questionnaire was pilot-tested for feasibility and administration times. An instrument containing five dimensions, fourteen areas, and 43 items was obtained and administered in 15 (12–31) minutes. A panel of experts evaluated the final questionnaire (CEECCA), awarding its areas and items CVI and RI values of 0.90 and above. In the absence of further psychometric studies, the questionnaire appears to be useful for assessing ability to communicate in individuals with aphasia.
format article
author Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta
Pedro-Ruymán Brito-Brito
Alfonso-Miguel García-Hernández
author_facet Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta
Pedro-Ruymán Brito-Brito
Alfonso-Miguel García-Hernández
author_sort Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta
title Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_short Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_full Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_fullStr Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_full_unstemmed Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_sort development and content validation of the ceecca questionnaire to assess ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia based on the nanda-i and noc
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f02e8674afb9419bb5dc618935f3247e
work_keys_str_mv AT willianjesusmartindorta developmentandcontentvalidationoftheceeccaquestionnairetoassessabilitytocommunicateamongindividualswithaphasiabasedonthenandaiandnoc
AT pedroruymanbritobrito developmentandcontentvalidationoftheceeccaquestionnairetoassessabilitytocommunicateamongindividualswithaphasiabasedonthenandaiandnoc
AT alfonsomiguelgarciahernandez developmentandcontentvalidationoftheceeccaquestionnairetoassessabilitytocommunicateamongindividualswithaphasiabasedonthenandaiandnoc
_version_ 1718412081364992000