Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe

Abstract The consideration of disaster resilience as a multidimensional concept provides a viable and promising way forward for reducing risk and minimizing impacts today and in the future. What is missing is the understanding of the actual dynamics of resilience over time based on empirical evidenc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan Velev, Finn Laurien, Karen Campbell, Jeffrey Czajkowski, Adriana Keating, Reinhard Mechler
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab8199
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab8199
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab81992021-12-02T15:28:52ZDifferences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe10.1038/s41598-021-96763-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab81992021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96763-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The consideration of disaster resilience as a multidimensional concept provides a viable and promising way forward for reducing risk and minimizing impacts today and in the future. What is missing is the understanding of the actual dynamics of resilience over time based on empirical evidence. This empirical understanding requires a consistent measure of resilience. To that end, a Technical Resilience Grading Standard for community flood resilience, was applied in a longitudinal study from 2016 to 2018 in 68 communities across the globe. We analyse the dynamics of disaster resilience using an advanced boosted regression tree modelling framework. The main outcome of our analysis is twofold: first, we found empirical evidence that the dynamics of resilience build on a typology of communities and that different community clusters experience different dynamics; and second, the dynamics of resilience follows transitional behaviour rather than a linear or continuous process. These are empirical insights that can provide ways forward, theoretically as well as practically, in the understanding of resilience as well as in regard to effective policy guidance to enhance disaster resilience.Stefan Hochrainer-StiglerStefan VelevFinn LaurienKaren CampbellJeffrey CzajkowskiAdriana KeatingReinhard MechlerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler Stefan Velev Finn Laurien Karen Campbell Jeffrey Czajkowski Adriana Keating Reinhard Mechler Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe
description	Abstract The consideration of disaster resilience as a multidimensional concept provides a viable and promising way forward for reducing risk and minimizing impacts today and in the future. What is missing is the understanding of the actual dynamics of resilience over time based on empirical evidence. This empirical understanding requires a consistent measure of resilience. To that end, a Technical Resilience Grading Standard for community flood resilience, was applied in a longitudinal study from 2016 to 2018 in 68 communities across the globe. We analyse the dynamics of disaster resilience using an advanced boosted regression tree modelling framework. The main outcome of our analysis is twofold: first, we found empirical evidence that the dynamics of resilience build on a typology of communities and that different community clusters experience different dynamics; and second, the dynamics of resilience follows transitional behaviour rather than a linear or continuous process. These are empirical insights that can provide ways forward, theoretically as well as practically, in the understanding of resilience as well as in regard to effective policy guidance to enhance disaster resilience.
format	article
author	Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler Stefan Velev Finn Laurien Karen Campbell Jeffrey Czajkowski Adriana Keating Reinhard Mechler
author_facet	Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler Stefan Velev Finn Laurien Karen Campbell Jeffrey Czajkowski Adriana Keating Reinhard Mechler
author_sort	Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler
title	Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe
title_short	Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe
title_full	Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe
title_fullStr	Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe
title_full_unstemmed	Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe
title_sort	differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab8199
work_keys_str_mv	AT stefanhochrainerstigler differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT stefanvelev differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT finnlaurien differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT karencampbell differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT jeffreyczajkowski differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT adrianakeating differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT reinhardmechler differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe
_version_	1718387239536295936

Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe

Ejemplares similares