Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe
Abstract The consideration of disaster resilience as a multidimensional concept provides a viable and promising way forward for reducing risk and minimizing impacts today and in the future. What is missing is the understanding of the actual dynamics of resilience over time based on empirical evidenc...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab8199 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab8199 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab81992021-12-02T15:28:52ZDifferences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe10.1038/s41598-021-96763-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab81992021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96763-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The consideration of disaster resilience as a multidimensional concept provides a viable and promising way forward for reducing risk and minimizing impacts today and in the future. What is missing is the understanding of the actual dynamics of resilience over time based on empirical evidence. This empirical understanding requires a consistent measure of resilience. To that end, a Technical Resilience Grading Standard for community flood resilience, was applied in a longitudinal study from 2016 to 2018 in 68 communities across the globe. We analyse the dynamics of disaster resilience using an advanced boosted regression tree modelling framework. The main outcome of our analysis is twofold: first, we found empirical evidence that the dynamics of resilience build on a typology of communities and that different community clusters experience different dynamics; and second, the dynamics of resilience follows transitional behaviour rather than a linear or continuous process. These are empirical insights that can provide ways forward, theoretically as well as practically, in the understanding of resilience as well as in regard to effective policy guidance to enhance disaster resilience.Stefan Hochrainer-StiglerStefan VelevFinn LaurienKaren CampbellJeffrey CzajkowskiAdriana KeatingReinhard MechlerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler Stefan Velev Finn Laurien Karen Campbell Jeffrey Czajkowski Adriana Keating Reinhard Mechler Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe |
description |
Abstract The consideration of disaster resilience as a multidimensional concept provides a viable and promising way forward for reducing risk and minimizing impacts today and in the future. What is missing is the understanding of the actual dynamics of resilience over time based on empirical evidence. This empirical understanding requires a consistent measure of resilience. To that end, a Technical Resilience Grading Standard for community flood resilience, was applied in a longitudinal study from 2016 to 2018 in 68 communities across the globe. We analyse the dynamics of disaster resilience using an advanced boosted regression tree modelling framework. The main outcome of our analysis is twofold: first, we found empirical evidence that the dynamics of resilience build on a typology of communities and that different community clusters experience different dynamics; and second, the dynamics of resilience follows transitional behaviour rather than a linear or continuous process. These are empirical insights that can provide ways forward, theoretically as well as practically, in the understanding of resilience as well as in regard to effective policy guidance to enhance disaster resilience. |
format |
article |
author |
Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler Stefan Velev Finn Laurien Karen Campbell Jeffrey Czajkowski Adriana Keating Reinhard Mechler |
author_facet |
Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler Stefan Velev Finn Laurien Karen Campbell Jeffrey Czajkowski Adriana Keating Reinhard Mechler |
author_sort |
Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler |
title |
Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe |
title_short |
Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe |
title_full |
Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe |
title_fullStr |
Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe |
title_sort |
differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f039cc14b6fb4bb4977b52fc94ab8199 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stefanhochrainerstigler differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT stefanvelev differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT finnlaurien differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT karencampbell differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT jeffreyczajkowski differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT adrianakeating differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe AT reinhardmechler differencesinthedynamicsofcommunitydisasterresilienceacrosstheglobe |
_version_ |
1718387239536295936 |