TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST

The political regime of the Republic of Turkey created by Ataturk  have always combines two mutually exclusive principles of Islam and  western democracy. Fro a long period of time in its foreign  policy Ankara has been foolowing the west-oriented vector. Since  1952 Turkey has been the member of NA...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: V. A. AVATKOV
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e2021-11-07T14:45:01ZTURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-2-181-196https://doaj.org/article/f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e2017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/36https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324The political regime of the Republic of Turkey created by Ataturk  have always combines two mutually exclusive principles of Islam and  western democracy. Fro a long period of time in its foreign  policy Ankara has been foolowing the west-oriented vector. Since  1952 Turkey has been the member of NATO and at the end of the  20th century made a strong application to become the member of the European Union. At the beginning of the 21st century pro- Western politics began to enter an increasingly obvious impasse.  Tukrey didn’t want to continue being a U.S. agent in the Middle East. However an attempt to play an active role in the region  led Turkey to almost complete international isolation. The  country was not ready a complete break in relations with influential Western allies. The loss of the status of an American agent would inevitably lead to a reduction of Turkey’s military-technical capabilities, and,  consequently, of the political influence that it was achieved in  cooperation with its Western patrons. The author comes to the  concludes that modern Turkey resembles a power which has not  determined its foreign policy priorities. It continues to pursue a  sufficiently risky policy of maneuvering between regional and global players.V. A. AVATKOVАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articleforeign policydiplomacymiddle easteuropevectorpriorityerdoganconflictInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 181-196 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic foreign policy
diplomacy
middle east
europe
vector
priority
erdogan
conflict
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle foreign policy
diplomacy
middle east
europe
vector
priority
erdogan
conflict
International relations
JZ2-6530
V. A. AVATKOV
TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST
description The political regime of the Republic of Turkey created by Ataturk  have always combines two mutually exclusive principles of Islam and  western democracy. Fro a long period of time in its foreign  policy Ankara has been foolowing the west-oriented vector. Since  1952 Turkey has been the member of NATO and at the end of the  20th century made a strong application to become the member of the European Union. At the beginning of the 21st century pro- Western politics began to enter an increasingly obvious impasse.  Tukrey didn’t want to continue being a U.S. agent in the Middle East. However an attempt to play an active role in the region  led Turkey to almost complete international isolation. The  country was not ready a complete break in relations with influential Western allies. The loss of the status of an American agent would inevitably lead to a reduction of Turkey’s military-technical capabilities, and,  consequently, of the political influence that it was achieved in  cooperation with its Western patrons. The author comes to the  concludes that modern Turkey resembles a power which has not  determined its foreign policy priorities. It continues to pursue a  sufficiently risky policy of maneuvering between regional and global players.
format article
author V. A. AVATKOV
author_facet V. A. AVATKOV
author_sort V. A. AVATKOV
title TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST
title_short TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST
title_full TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST
title_fullStr TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST
title_full_unstemmed TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST
title_sort turkey: turn to the east
publisher Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e
work_keys_str_mv AT vaavatkov turkeyturntotheeast
_version_ 1718443391447990272