TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST
The political regime of the Republic of Turkey created by Ataturk have always combines two mutually exclusive principles of Islam and western democracy. Fro a long period of time in its foreign policy Ankara has been foolowing the west-oriented vector. Since 1952 Turkey has been the member of NA...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN RU |
Publicado: |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e2021-11-07T14:45:01ZTURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-2-181-196https://doaj.org/article/f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e2017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/36https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324The political regime of the Republic of Turkey created by Ataturk have always combines two mutually exclusive principles of Islam and western democracy. Fro a long period of time in its foreign policy Ankara has been foolowing the west-oriented vector. Since 1952 Turkey has been the member of NATO and at the end of the 20th century made a strong application to become the member of the European Union. At the beginning of the 21st century pro- Western politics began to enter an increasingly obvious impasse. Tukrey didn’t want to continue being a U.S. agent in the Middle East. However an attempt to play an active role in the region led Turkey to almost complete international isolation. The country was not ready a complete break in relations with influential Western allies. The loss of the status of an American agent would inevitably lead to a reduction of Turkey’s military-technical capabilities, and, consequently, of the political influence that it was achieved in cooperation with its Western patrons. The author comes to the concludes that modern Turkey resembles a power which has not determined its foreign policy priorities. It continues to pursue a sufficiently risky policy of maneuvering between regional and global players.V. A. AVATKOVАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articleforeign policydiplomacymiddle easteuropevectorpriorityerdoganconflictInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 181-196 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN RU |
topic |
foreign policy diplomacy middle east europe vector priority erdogan conflict International relations JZ2-6530 |
spellingShingle |
foreign policy diplomacy middle east europe vector priority erdogan conflict International relations JZ2-6530 V. A. AVATKOV TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST |
description |
The political regime of the Republic of Turkey created by Ataturk have always combines two mutually exclusive principles of Islam and western democracy. Fro a long period of time in its foreign policy Ankara has been foolowing the west-oriented vector. Since 1952 Turkey has been the member of NATO and at the end of the 20th century made a strong application to become the member of the European Union. At the beginning of the 21st century pro- Western politics began to enter an increasingly obvious impasse. Tukrey didn’t want to continue being a U.S. agent in the Middle East. However an attempt to play an active role in the region led Turkey to almost complete international isolation. The country was not ready a complete break in relations with influential Western allies. The loss of the status of an American agent would inevitably lead to a reduction of Turkey’s military-technical capabilities, and, consequently, of the political influence that it was achieved in cooperation with its Western patrons. The author comes to the concludes that modern Turkey resembles a power which has not determined its foreign policy priorities. It continues to pursue a sufficiently risky policy of maneuvering between regional and global players. |
format |
article |
author |
V. A. AVATKOV |
author_facet |
V. A. AVATKOV |
author_sort |
V. A. AVATKOV |
title |
TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST |
title_short |
TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST |
title_full |
TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST |
title_fullStr |
TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST |
title_full_unstemmed |
TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST |
title_sort |
turkey: turn to the east |
publisher |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f072f7f2c8a84022aebb46bc250fc80e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vaavatkov turkeyturntotheeast |
_version_ |
1718443391447990272 |