Evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals

This paper is part of the reflection initiated in 2016 following the 20th anniversary of the Public Understanding of Science Journal, analyzing both the thematic evolution of the journal itself and broader aspects of the evolution of the field. Here, we aim to analyze developments in PUS based on al...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Luciano Levin, Daniela De Filippo
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:	science literacy public understanding of science science communication Technology (General) T1-995 Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f08cb410b8624dbd80bdec996d4728ae
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f08cb410b8624dbd80bdec996d4728ae
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f08cb410b8624dbd80bdec996d4728ae2021-11-04T15:51:57ZEvolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals2572-986110.1080/25729861.2021.1954381https://doaj.org/article/f08cb410b8624dbd80bdec996d4728ae2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1954381https://doaj.org/toc/2572-9861This paper is part of the reflection initiated in 2016 following the 20th anniversary of the Public Understanding of Science Journal, analyzing both the thematic evolution of the journal itself and broader aspects of the evolution of the field. Here, we aim to analyze developments in PUS based on all the papers published in the field’s two major journals: Science Communication and Public Understanding of Science. We propose to study the field based on the epistemic relations established between texts resulting from the references they include. Thus, although the aforementioned journals constitute our source of information, by incorporating in the analysis the references of all the papers in these journals – which include books and other journals – we significantly expand the scope and build the epistemic links that are established by the texts analyzed in a very specific way.Luciano LevinDaniela De FilippoTaylor & Francis Grouparticlescience literacypublic understanding of sciencescience communicationTechnology (General)T1-995Social sciences (General)H1-99ENTapuya, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	science literacy public understanding of science science communication Technology (General) T1-995 Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	science literacy public understanding of science science communication Technology (General) T1-995 Social sciences (General) H1-99 Luciano Levin Daniela De Filippo Evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals
description	This paper is part of the reflection initiated in 2016 following the 20th anniversary of the Public Understanding of Science Journal, analyzing both the thematic evolution of the journal itself and broader aspects of the evolution of the field. Here, we aim to analyze developments in PUS based on all the papers published in the field’s two major journals: Science Communication and Public Understanding of Science. We propose to study the field based on the epistemic relations established between texts resulting from the references they include. Thus, although the aforementioned journals constitute our source of information, by incorporating in the analysis the references of all the papers in these journals – which include books and other journals – we significantly expand the scope and build the epistemic links that are established by the texts analyzed in a very specific way.
format	article
author	Luciano Levin Daniela De Filippo
author_facet	Luciano Levin Daniela De Filippo
author_sort	Luciano Levin
title	Evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals
title_short	Evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals
title_full	Evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals
title_fullStr	Evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals
title_full_unstemmed	Evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals
title_sort	evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals
publisher	Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/f08cb410b8624dbd80bdec996d4728ae
work_keys_str_mv	AT lucianolevin evolutionofthepublicunderstandingofsciencefieldbasedonabibliometricanalysisoftwomajorjournals AT danieladefilippo evolutionofthepublicunderstandingofsciencefieldbasedonabibliometricanalysisoftwomajorjournals
_version_	1718444686220197888

Evolution of the public understanding of science field based on a bibliometric analysis of two major journals

Ejemplares similares