Does the Disclosure of an Audit Engagement Partner’s Name Improve the Audit Quality? A Difference-in-Difference Analysis
On 15 December 2015, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) passed Rule 3211, requiring audit firms registered with PCAOB in the U.S. to disclose the audit engagement partner’s name in the Form AP, effective 31 January 2017. The regulation aims to improve the transparency and quality...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Kose John, Min (Shirley) Liu |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f097b2d041de4b0eb022ef479b7ae40f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Non-audit services and auditor independence: Norwegian evidence
por: Yu (Elli) Zhang, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Assessing the Relation among Audit Detection Risk, Audit Market Competition Environment and Audit Services Fee
por: Mohammad Hassani
Publicado: (2021) -
Audit tenure and audit Qualifications in a low litigation risk setting: An analysis of the Spanish market
por: García Blandón,Josep, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Management Uncertainty and Audit Fees
por: Vali Khodadadi, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Independent audit committee, risk management committee, and audit fees
por: Dyah Ayu Larasati, et al.
Publicado: (2019)