Does the Disclosure of an Audit Engagement Partner’s Name Improve the Audit Quality? A Difference-in-Difference Analysis
On 15 December 2015, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) passed Rule 3211, requiring audit firms registered with PCAOB in the U.S. to disclose the audit engagement partner’s name in the Form AP, effective 31 January 2017. The regulation aims to improve the transparency and quality...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Kose John, Min (Shirley) Liu |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/f097b2d041de4b0eb022ef479b7ae40f |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Non-audit services and auditor independence: Norwegian evidence
by: Yu (Elli) Zhang, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Assessing the Relation among Audit Detection Risk, Audit Market Competition Environment and Audit Services Fee
by: Mohammad Hassani
Published: (2021) -
Audit tenure and audit Qualifications in a low litigation risk setting: An analysis of the Spanish market
by: García Blandón,Josep, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Management Uncertainty and Audit Fees
by: Vali Khodadadi, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Independent audit committee, risk management committee, and audit fees
by: Dyah Ayu Larasati, et al.
Published: (2019)