Does the Disclosure of an Audit Engagement Partner’s Name Improve the Audit Quality? A Difference-in-Difference Analysis
On 15 December 2015, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) passed Rule 3211, requiring audit firms registered with PCAOB in the U.S. to disclose the audit engagement partner’s name in the Form AP, effective 31 January 2017. The regulation aims to improve the transparency and quality...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Kose John, Min (Shirley) Liu |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/f097b2d041de4b0eb022ef479b7ae40f |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Non-audit services and auditor independence: Norwegian evidence
par: Yu (Elli) Zhang, et autres
Publié: (2016) -
Assessing the Relation among Audit Detection Risk, Audit Market Competition Environment and Audit Services Fee
par: Mohammad Hassani
Publié: (2021) -
Audit tenure and audit Qualifications in a low litigation risk setting: An analysis of the Spanish market
par: García Blandón,Josep, et autres
Publié: (2013) -
Management Uncertainty and Audit Fees
par: Vali Khodadadi, et autres
Publié: (2017) -
Independent audit committee, risk management committee, and audit fees
par: Dyah Ayu Larasati, et autres
Publié: (2019)