Crises, Creditors and Cramdowns: An evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the WHOA in light of Directive (EU) 2019/1023

Covid-19 has severe economic consequences, leading to an increasing amount of businesses facing overwhelming debts. Since the financial crisis of 2008 the European Union has taken on a more rescue-oriented approach towards bankruptcy, resulting in Directive (EU) 2019/1023. This Directive creates a f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hidde Volberda
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Utrecht University School of Law 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f0b76c5b2374438db61b9dd0aa0c922a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f0b76c5b2374438db61b9dd0aa0c922a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f0b76c5b2374438db61b9dd0aa0c922a2021-11-08T08:17:05ZCrises, Creditors and Cramdowns: An evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the WHOA in light of Directive (EU) 2019/10231871-515X10.36633/ulr.638https://doaj.org/article/f0b76c5b2374438db61b9dd0aa0c922a2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/638https://doaj.org/toc/1871-515XCovid-19 has severe economic consequences, leading to an increasing amount of businesses facing overwhelming debts. Since the financial crisis of 2008 the European Union has taken on a more rescue-oriented approach towards bankruptcy, resulting in Directive (EU) 2019/1023. This Directive creates a framework for pre-insolvency restructuring, thereby avoiding unnecessary bankruptcies. Accordingly, pre-insolvency restructuring is a valuable instrument in mitigating the negative economic effects of Covid-19. The Netherlands has recently adopted the Act on the Confirmation of Private Plans (WHOA), National Legislation on pre-insolvency restructuring. In order to balance the rights of secured and unsecured creditors the 20%-rule was adopted. This rule guarantees small-scale Small-to-Midsized (SME)-creditors the right to satisfaction of 20% of their claims in restructuring proceedings. In this paper, I evaluate whether the 20%-rule is in accordance with the Directive. I argue that the 20%-rule is in line with the Directive, but that the overly restrictive system of judicial review under the WHOA hampers its application in practice. Therefore, the Dutch legislator should allow for more room for judicial interpretation on the suitability of the application of the 20%-rule. This more nuanced approach better aligns the 20%-rule with the European Restructuring Directive.Hidde VolberdaUtrecht University School of Lawarticlerestructuring directivewhoasmesinsolvencycorporate rescuecovid-19Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENUtrecht Law Review, Vol 17, Iss 3 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic restructuring directive
whoa
smes
insolvency
corporate rescue
covid-19
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
spellingShingle restructuring directive
whoa
smes
insolvency
corporate rescue
covid-19
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Hidde Volberda
Crises, Creditors and Cramdowns: An evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the WHOA in light of Directive (EU) 2019/1023
description Covid-19 has severe economic consequences, leading to an increasing amount of businesses facing overwhelming debts. Since the financial crisis of 2008 the European Union has taken on a more rescue-oriented approach towards bankruptcy, resulting in Directive (EU) 2019/1023. This Directive creates a framework for pre-insolvency restructuring, thereby avoiding unnecessary bankruptcies. Accordingly, pre-insolvency restructuring is a valuable instrument in mitigating the negative economic effects of Covid-19. The Netherlands has recently adopted the Act on the Confirmation of Private Plans (WHOA), National Legislation on pre-insolvency restructuring. In order to balance the rights of secured and unsecured creditors the 20%-rule was adopted. This rule guarantees small-scale Small-to-Midsized (SME)-creditors the right to satisfaction of 20% of their claims in restructuring proceedings. In this paper, I evaluate whether the 20%-rule is in accordance with the Directive. I argue that the 20%-rule is in line with the Directive, but that the overly restrictive system of judicial review under the WHOA hampers its application in practice. Therefore, the Dutch legislator should allow for more room for judicial interpretation on the suitability of the application of the 20%-rule. This more nuanced approach better aligns the 20%-rule with the European Restructuring Directive.
format article
author Hidde Volberda
author_facet Hidde Volberda
author_sort Hidde Volberda
title Crises, Creditors and Cramdowns: An evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the WHOA in light of Directive (EU) 2019/1023
title_short Crises, Creditors and Cramdowns: An evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the WHOA in light of Directive (EU) 2019/1023
title_full Crises, Creditors and Cramdowns: An evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the WHOA in light of Directive (EU) 2019/1023
title_fullStr Crises, Creditors and Cramdowns: An evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the WHOA in light of Directive (EU) 2019/1023
title_full_unstemmed Crises, Creditors and Cramdowns: An evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the WHOA in light of Directive (EU) 2019/1023
title_sort crises, creditors and cramdowns: an evaluation of the protection of minority creditors under the whoa in light of directive (eu) 2019/1023
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f0b76c5b2374438db61b9dd0aa0c922a
work_keys_str_mv AT hiddevolberda crisescreditorsandcramdownsanevaluationoftheprotectionofminoritycreditorsunderthewhoainlightofdirectiveeu20191023
_version_ 1718442864882483200