Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fogging on the effectiveness of a lead glass shield in protecting an operator from radiation exposure during conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used to measure the effects of fogged lead glass...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c2021-11-25T16:37:07ZRadiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study10.3390/app1122107432076-3417https://doaj.org/article/f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/22/10743https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fogging on the effectiveness of a lead glass shield in protecting an operator from radiation exposure during conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used to measure the effects of fogged lead glass shields (FLSs) and clear lead glass shields (CLSs) on the radiation doses of a cardiac catheterization surgeon. We simulated the scatter radiation incident on the operator with five angiographic projections with 10-s exposures. Experiments were conducted with a field of view of 25 cm, maximum of 100 cm between the X-ray tube and image intensifier, and 80 cm between the image intensifier and operator. Lead glass fogging had no significant effect at any angiographic projection. The average dose at the lens of the eye, thyroid glands, and gonads did not differ significantly between FLS and CLS. Although most surgeons view ceiling-suspended shields as hindrances during surgical procedures, the radiation dose at the operator’s eyes and thyroid glands increased by 13 and 10 times without the shield. The fogging of the shield is probably caused by post-surgery UV decontamination or detergents. An operator has no cause for concern regarding the radiation protection afforded by an FLS during CAG procedures.Hsin-Hon LinLu-Han LaiKuo-Ting TangChien-Yi TingCheng-Shih LaiMDPI AGarticlefog lead screenclear lead screenradiation protectionangiocardiographyTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10743, p 10743 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
fog lead screen clear lead screen radiation protection angiocardiography Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 |
spellingShingle |
fog lead screen clear lead screen radiation protection angiocardiography Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 Hsin-Hon Lin Lu-Han Lai Kuo-Ting Tang Chien-Yi Ting Cheng-Shih Lai Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fogging on the effectiveness of a lead glass shield in protecting an operator from radiation exposure during conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used to measure the effects of fogged lead glass shields (FLSs) and clear lead glass shields (CLSs) on the radiation doses of a cardiac catheterization surgeon. We simulated the scatter radiation incident on the operator with five angiographic projections with 10-s exposures. Experiments were conducted with a field of view of 25 cm, maximum of 100 cm between the X-ray tube and image intensifier, and 80 cm between the image intensifier and operator. Lead glass fogging had no significant effect at any angiographic projection. The average dose at the lens of the eye, thyroid glands, and gonads did not differ significantly between FLS and CLS. Although most surgeons view ceiling-suspended shields as hindrances during surgical procedures, the radiation dose at the operator’s eyes and thyroid glands increased by 13 and 10 times without the shield. The fogging of the shield is probably caused by post-surgery UV decontamination or detergents. An operator has no cause for concern regarding the radiation protection afforded by an FLS during CAG procedures. |
format |
article |
author |
Hsin-Hon Lin Lu-Han Lai Kuo-Ting Tang Chien-Yi Ting Cheng-Shih Lai |
author_facet |
Hsin-Hon Lin Lu-Han Lai Kuo-Ting Tang Chien-Yi Ting Cheng-Shih Lai |
author_sort |
Hsin-Hon Lin |
title |
Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study |
title_short |
Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study |
title_full |
Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study |
title_fullStr |
Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study |
title_sort |
radiation dose assessment of the fog lead acrylic shields during coronary angiography: a phantom study |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hsinhonlin radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy AT luhanlai radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy AT kuotingtang radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy AT chienyiting radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy AT chengshihlai radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy |
_version_ |
1718413113337839616 |