Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fogging on the effectiveness of a lead glass shield in protecting an operator from radiation exposure during conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used to measure the effects of fogged lead glass...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsin-Hon Lin, Lu-Han Lai, Kuo-Ting Tang, Chien-Yi Ting, Cheng-Shih Lai
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c2021-11-25T16:37:07ZRadiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study10.3390/app1122107432076-3417https://doaj.org/article/f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/22/10743https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fogging on the effectiveness of a lead glass shield in protecting an operator from radiation exposure during conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used to measure the effects of fogged lead glass shields (FLSs) and clear lead glass shields (CLSs) on the radiation doses of a cardiac catheterization surgeon. We simulated the scatter radiation incident on the operator with five angiographic projections with 10-s exposures. Experiments were conducted with a field of view of 25 cm, maximum of 100 cm between the X-ray tube and image intensifier, and 80 cm between the image intensifier and operator. Lead glass fogging had no significant effect at any angiographic projection. The average dose at the lens of the eye, thyroid glands, and gonads did not differ significantly between FLS and CLS. Although most surgeons view ceiling-suspended shields as hindrances during surgical procedures, the radiation dose at the operator’s eyes and thyroid glands increased by 13 and 10 times without the shield. The fogging of the shield is probably caused by post-surgery UV decontamination or detergents. An operator has no cause for concern regarding the radiation protection afforded by an FLS during CAG procedures.Hsin-Hon LinLu-Han LaiKuo-Ting TangChien-Yi TingCheng-Shih LaiMDPI AGarticlefog lead screenclear lead screenradiation protectionangiocardiographyTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10743, p 10743 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic fog lead screen
clear lead screen
radiation protection
angiocardiography
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle fog lead screen
clear lead screen
radiation protection
angiocardiography
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
Hsin-Hon Lin
Lu-Han Lai
Kuo-Ting Tang
Chien-Yi Ting
Cheng-Shih Lai
Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study
description This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fogging on the effectiveness of a lead glass shield in protecting an operator from radiation exposure during conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used to measure the effects of fogged lead glass shields (FLSs) and clear lead glass shields (CLSs) on the radiation doses of a cardiac catheterization surgeon. We simulated the scatter radiation incident on the operator with five angiographic projections with 10-s exposures. Experiments were conducted with a field of view of 25 cm, maximum of 100 cm between the X-ray tube and image intensifier, and 80 cm between the image intensifier and operator. Lead glass fogging had no significant effect at any angiographic projection. The average dose at the lens of the eye, thyroid glands, and gonads did not differ significantly between FLS and CLS. Although most surgeons view ceiling-suspended shields as hindrances during surgical procedures, the radiation dose at the operator’s eyes and thyroid glands increased by 13 and 10 times without the shield. The fogging of the shield is probably caused by post-surgery UV decontamination or detergents. An operator has no cause for concern regarding the radiation protection afforded by an FLS during CAG procedures.
format article
author Hsin-Hon Lin
Lu-Han Lai
Kuo-Ting Tang
Chien-Yi Ting
Cheng-Shih Lai
author_facet Hsin-Hon Lin
Lu-Han Lai
Kuo-Ting Tang
Chien-Yi Ting
Cheng-Shih Lai
author_sort Hsin-Hon Lin
title Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study
title_short Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study
title_full Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study
title_fullStr Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study
title_full_unstemmed Radiation Dose Assessment of the Fog Lead Acrylic Shields during Coronary Angiography: A Phantom Study
title_sort radiation dose assessment of the fog lead acrylic shields during coronary angiography: a phantom study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f0ba1dbbad094474a7ac81556993aa4c
work_keys_str_mv AT hsinhonlin radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy
AT luhanlai radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy
AT kuotingtang radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy
AT chienyiting radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy
AT chengshihlai radiationdoseassessmentofthefogleadacrylicshieldsduringcoronaryangiographyaphantomstudy
_version_ 1718413113337839616