Secondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language

The relevance of the study is determined by the author’s appeal to the analysis of one of the dynamic processes that characterize the current state of the lexico-semantic system - secondary borrowing of foreign words. The questions concerning the differentiation of terminological words and phrases u...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Y. Yu. Mageramova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2019
Materias:	secondary borrowing double borrowing passive lexicon returned lexicon dearchaization reactivation active dictionary Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f0f9fa28e3e94cdf8bbe79aa87f4c0dc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f0f9fa28e3e94cdf8bbe79aa87f4c0dc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f0f9fa28e3e94cdf8bbe79aa87f4c0dc2021-12-02T07:58:07ZSecondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2019-4-60-69https://doaj.org/article/f0f9fa28e3e94cdf8bbe79aa87f4c0dc2019-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1194https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The relevance of the study is determined by the author’s appeal to the analysis of one of the dynamic processes that characterize the current state of the lexico-semantic system - secondary borrowing of foreign words. The questions concerning the differentiation of terminological words and phrases used by modern lexicologists in the process of studying the active processes occurring in the Russian language at the turn of the century are considered. Attention is paid to the analysis of approaches to foreign language vocabulary both “returned” from the passive lexicon and re-borrowed from foreign languages in the period of the late 20th - early 21st centuries. The question of expediency of use in a number of cases of the term secondary borrowing as the most accurately reflecting essence of the occurring processes is raised. Special attention is paid to the distinction between cases of dearchaization and secondary borrowing. The causes of vocabulary dearchaization are covered, among them being pro-western and pro-Russian tendencies inherent in modern social consciousness. Analysis of the tokens governor and bachelor proves, that the term dearchaizated (reactivated) vocabulary traditionally used in relation to certain words of lexical-thematic groups “Public-political organization” and “Education” should be replaced by the term secondary borrowed vocabulary .Y. Yu. MageramovaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlesecondary borrowingdouble borrowingpassive lexiconreturned lexicondearchaizationreactivationactive dictionarySlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 4, Pp 60-69 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	secondary borrowing double borrowing passive lexicon returned lexicon dearchaization reactivation active dictionary Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	secondary borrowing double borrowing passive lexicon returned lexicon dearchaization reactivation active dictionary Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 Y. Yu. Mageramova Secondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language
description	The relevance of the study is determined by the author’s appeal to the analysis of one of the dynamic processes that characterize the current state of the lexico-semantic system - secondary borrowing of foreign words. The questions concerning the differentiation of terminological words and phrases used by modern lexicologists in the process of studying the active processes occurring in the Russian language at the turn of the century are considered. Attention is paid to the analysis of approaches to foreign language vocabulary both “returned” from the passive lexicon and re-borrowed from foreign languages in the period of the late 20th - early 21st centuries. The question of expediency of use in a number of cases of the term secondary borrowing as the most accurately reflecting essence of the occurring processes is raised. Special attention is paid to the distinction between cases of dearchaization and secondary borrowing. The causes of vocabulary dearchaization are covered, among them being pro-western and pro-Russian tendencies inherent in modern social consciousness. Analysis of the tokens governor and bachelor proves, that the term dearchaizated (reactivated) vocabulary traditionally used in relation to certain words of lexical-thematic groups “Public-political organization” and “Education” should be replaced by the term secondary borrowed vocabulary .
format	article
author	Y. Yu. Mageramova
author_facet	Y. Yu. Mageramova
author_sort	Y. Yu. Mageramova
title	Secondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language
title_short	Secondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language
title_full	Secondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language
title_fullStr	Secondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language
title_full_unstemmed	Secondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language
title_sort	secondary borrowing of lexical units as active process in modern russian language
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/f0f9fa28e3e94cdf8bbe79aa87f4c0dc
work_keys_str_mv	AT yyumageramova secondaryborrowingoflexicalunitsasactiveprocessinmodernrussianlanguage
_version_	1718398953387458560

Secondary Borrowing of Lexical Units as Active Process in Modern Russian Language

Ejemplares similares