Not open for all: accessibility of open textbooks

In order for open educational resources (OERs) to be truly open to all, they must be accessible to learners with disabilities, including those with visual, auditory, physical and cognitive disabilities. This study sought to determine the accessibility of a randomly selected sample of 355 open textbo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elena Azadbakht, Teresa Schultz, Jennifer Arellano
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2021
Materias:
Z
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f0fd413dc4dc4a48acfc914f19fee39e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f0fd413dc4dc4a48acfc914f19fee39e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f0fd413dc4dc4a48acfc914f19fee39e2021-11-08T08:16:33ZNot open for all: accessibility of open textbooks2048-775410.1629/uksg.557https://doaj.org/article/f0fd413dc4dc4a48acfc914f19fee39e2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://insights.uksg.org/articles/557https://doaj.org/toc/2048-7754In order for open educational resources (OERs) to be truly open to all, they must be accessible to learners with disabilities, including those with visual, auditory, physical and cognitive disabilities. This study sought to determine the accessibility of a randomly selected sample of 355 open textbooks using a custom rubric based upon the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C’s) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), version 2.1, primarily at the Levels A and AA. Included books fell into one of four format types: HTML files/websites, PDFs, Microsoft Word documents and EPUBs. The average number of ‘fails’ – instances in which they ran afoul of a rubric category – across the whole sample was 5.93 and the median was 6, out of a total of 14 or 15 categories, depending on the format type. Overall, most of the books did not meet basic accessibility requirements, such as including alternative text for any images, properly coding/tagging any tables and following a logical heading order structure.Elena AzadbakhtTeresa SchultzJennifer ArellanoUbiquity Pressarticleopen accessopen educational resourcesaccessibilityBibliography. Library science. Information resourcesZENInsights: The UKSG Journal , Vol 34, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic open access
open educational resources
accessibility
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
spellingShingle open access
open educational resources
accessibility
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
Elena Azadbakht
Teresa Schultz
Jennifer Arellano
Not open for all: accessibility of open textbooks
description In order for open educational resources (OERs) to be truly open to all, they must be accessible to learners with disabilities, including those with visual, auditory, physical and cognitive disabilities. This study sought to determine the accessibility of a randomly selected sample of 355 open textbooks using a custom rubric based upon the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C’s) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), version 2.1, primarily at the Levels A and AA. Included books fell into one of four format types: HTML files/websites, PDFs, Microsoft Word documents and EPUBs. The average number of ‘fails’ – instances in which they ran afoul of a rubric category – across the whole sample was 5.93 and the median was 6, out of a total of 14 or 15 categories, depending on the format type. Overall, most of the books did not meet basic accessibility requirements, such as including alternative text for any images, properly coding/tagging any tables and following a logical heading order structure.
format article
author Elena Azadbakht
Teresa Schultz
Jennifer Arellano
author_facet Elena Azadbakht
Teresa Schultz
Jennifer Arellano
author_sort Elena Azadbakht
title Not open for all: accessibility of open textbooks
title_short Not open for all: accessibility of open textbooks
title_full Not open for all: accessibility of open textbooks
title_fullStr Not open for all: accessibility of open textbooks
title_full_unstemmed Not open for all: accessibility of open textbooks
title_sort not open for all: accessibility of open textbooks
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f0fd413dc4dc4a48acfc914f19fee39e
work_keys_str_mv AT elenaazadbakht notopenforallaccessibilityofopentextbooks
AT teresaschultz notopenforallaccessibilityofopentextbooks
AT jenniferarellano notopenforallaccessibilityofopentextbooks
_version_ 1718442865159307264