Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest

Background: Technology readiness (TR) is a construct which characterizes an individual’s propensity to utilize new technology. Despite increased technology use in healthcare, limited data exists on medical student TR and the relation of TR with specialty interest. This study assesses the TR of 2nd...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wyatt MacNevin, Eric Poon, Thomas Skinner
Format: article
Language:EN
Published: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/f10d66c27bfd4a01ae07071a46ebb4dd
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f10d66c27bfd4a01ae07071a46ebb4dd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f10d66c27bfd4a01ae07071a46ebb4dd2021-12-01T22:38:09ZTechnology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest10.36834/cmej.706241923-1202https://doaj.org/article/f10d66c27bfd4a01ae07071a46ebb4dd2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/70624https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202 Background: Technology readiness (TR) is a construct which characterizes an individual’s propensity to utilize new technology. Despite increased technology use in healthcare, limited data exists on medical student TR and the relation of TR with specialty interest. This study assesses the TR of 2nd year medical students and its association with specialty interest. Methods: Respondents completed a survey assessing their most preferred specialty, specialty interests, and technology readiness using a 5-point Likert scale. Using Chi-square analysis, we examined the relation between demographics, TR, and specialty interest. Results: This study obtained a 45.7% (n = 53/116) response rate demonstrating that 79.2% (n = 42/53) of students were “technology ready.” Male students were more likely to be technology ready (95.2%, n = 20/21, vs 68.8%, n = 22/32, p = 0.02) when compared to female students. Technology ready students were associated with being more interested in “Technology-Focused” specialties compared to students who were not technology ready (88.5%, n = 23/26 vs 70.4%, n = 19/27, p = 0.104). Conclusions: As a cohort, most medical students were technology ready. It is inconclusive if technology ready students are more likely to be interested in technology-focused specialties due to the limited sample size of this study, although with an increased sample size, an improved understanding on technology readiness and its potential impact on student specialty interest may be obtained. Furthermore, knowledge of TR may aid in developing targeted technology-based education programs and in improving remedial approaches for students who are less comfortable with new technology. Wyatt MacNevinEric PoonThomas SkinnerCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 12, Iss 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Wyatt MacNevin
Eric Poon
Thomas Skinner
Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest
description Background: Technology readiness (TR) is a construct which characterizes an individual’s propensity to utilize new technology. Despite increased technology use in healthcare, limited data exists on medical student TR and the relation of TR with specialty interest. This study assesses the TR of 2nd year medical students and its association with specialty interest. Methods: Respondents completed a survey assessing their most preferred specialty, specialty interests, and technology readiness using a 5-point Likert scale. Using Chi-square analysis, we examined the relation between demographics, TR, and specialty interest. Results: This study obtained a 45.7% (n = 53/116) response rate demonstrating that 79.2% (n = 42/53) of students were “technology ready.” Male students were more likely to be technology ready (95.2%, n = 20/21, vs 68.8%, n = 22/32, p = 0.02) when compared to female students. Technology ready students were associated with being more interested in “Technology-Focused” specialties compared to students who were not technology ready (88.5%, n = 23/26 vs 70.4%, n = 19/27, p = 0.104). Conclusions: As a cohort, most medical students were technology ready. It is inconclusive if technology ready students are more likely to be interested in technology-focused specialties due to the limited sample size of this study, although with an increased sample size, an improved understanding on technology readiness and its potential impact on student specialty interest may be obtained. Furthermore, knowledge of TR may aid in developing targeted technology-based education programs and in improving remedial approaches for students who are less comfortable with new technology.
format article
author Wyatt MacNevin
Eric Poon
Thomas Skinner
author_facet Wyatt MacNevin
Eric Poon
Thomas Skinner
author_sort Wyatt MacNevin
title Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest
title_short Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest
title_full Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest
title_fullStr Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest
title_full_unstemmed Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest
title_sort technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f10d66c27bfd4a01ae07071a46ebb4dd
work_keys_str_mv AT wyattmacnevin technologyreadinessofmedicalstudentsandtheassociationoftechnologyreadinesswithspecialtyinterest
AT ericpoon technologyreadinessofmedicalstudentsandtheassociationoftechnologyreadinesswithspecialtyinterest
AT thomasskinner technologyreadinessofmedicalstudentsandtheassociationoftechnologyreadinesswithspecialtyinterest
_version_ 1718404136605581312