“A luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a Resolução 10 do CNDH e a promessa de mudança”
The struggle of social movements for land tenure and access to housing has a constant interface with the judicial institutions, which are activated for the defense of property. In Brazil, the normative system has several devices asserting that private ownership is obliged by law to play a social rol...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | PT |
Publicado: |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f112647c38424906862a2cd6df4a7ef9 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f112647c38424906862a2cd6df4a7ef9 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f112647c38424906862a2cd6df4a7ef92021-11-11T15:42:03Z“A luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a Resolução 10 do CNDH e a promessa de mudança”2177-622910.4013/csu.2020.56.3.12https://doaj.org/article/f112647c38424906862a2cd6df4a7ef92020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93868584012https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6229The struggle of social movements for land tenure and access to housing has a constant interface with the judicial institutions, which are activated for the defense of property. In Brazil, the normative system has several devices asserting that private ownership is obliged by law to play a social role, as well as the pondering of rights and mediation of disputes over land. These categories, nonetheless, are not as commonly used in courts as they could be. Based on cases that occurred in Brazil from 2018 to 2020, the present work analyzes some of the categories used in legal proceedings to defend the right of land-dwellers to stay in the area against the corresponding interpretation yielded by judicial rulings. Our data selection leans on a new disposition with solutions guaranteeing human rights and preventive measures in situations of rural and urban collective land disputes from the National Human Rights Council (CNDH), Resolution 10. Results suggest a difference between the uses expected by the social movements and their representatives and the reception of the norms by the Judiciary.Maria Eugenia TrombiniDaisy RibeiroUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)articleland disputesjudiciaryhuman rightseviction actionspossession claimssocial function of propertySocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99PTCiências Sociais Unisinos, Vol 56, Iss 3, Pp 391-403 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
PT |
topic |
land disputes judiciary human rights eviction actions possession claims social function of property Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 |
spellingShingle |
land disputes judiciary human rights eviction actions possession claims social function of property Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Maria Eugenia Trombini Daisy Ribeiro “A luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a Resolução 10 do CNDH e a promessa de mudança” |
description |
The struggle of social movements for land tenure and access to housing has a constant interface with the judicial institutions, which are activated for the defense of property. In Brazil, the normative system has several devices asserting that private ownership is obliged by law to play a social role, as well as the pondering of rights and mediation of disputes over land. These categories, nonetheless, are not as commonly used in courts as they could be. Based on cases that occurred in Brazil from 2018 to 2020, the present work analyzes some of the categories used in legal proceedings to defend the right of land-dwellers to stay in the area against the corresponding interpretation yielded by judicial rulings. Our data selection leans on a new disposition with solutions guaranteeing human rights and preventive measures in situations of rural and urban collective land disputes from the National Human Rights Council (CNDH), Resolution 10. Results suggest a difference between the uses expected by the social movements and their representatives and the reception of the norms by the Judiciary. |
format |
article |
author |
Maria Eugenia Trombini Daisy Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Maria Eugenia Trombini Daisy Ribeiro |
author_sort |
Maria Eugenia Trombini |
title |
“A luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a Resolução 10 do CNDH e a promessa de mudança” |
title_short |
“A luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a Resolução 10 do CNDH e a promessa de mudança” |
title_full |
“A luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a Resolução 10 do CNDH e a promessa de mudança” |
title_fullStr |
“A luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a Resolução 10 do CNDH e a promessa de mudança” |
title_full_unstemmed |
“A luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a Resolução 10 do CNDH e a promessa de mudança” |
title_sort |
“a luta dos movimentos sociais contra os despejos coletivos nas instituições judiciais: a resolução 10 do cndh e a promessa de mudança” |
publisher |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f112647c38424906862a2cd6df4a7ef9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariaeugeniatrombini alutadosmovimentossociaiscontraosdespejoscoletivosnasinstituicoesjudiciaisaresolucao10docndheapromessademudanca AT daisyribeiro alutadosmovimentossociaiscontraosdespejoscoletivosnasinstituicoesjudiciaisaresolucao10docndheapromessademudanca |
_version_ |
1718434123057463296 |