A Phenomenology of Social Stances
The paper develops a phenomenology of social stances, trying to show that Margaret Gilbert’s work on joint commitments can be understood as a special case of what here presented. The offered conceptualization shows that “to accept” is an important moment of social reality (as in Gilbert’s work), bu...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f11d0f54ec914865ba90e42afc51f831 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f11d0f54ec914865ba90e42afc51f831 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f11d0f54ec914865ba90e42afc51f8312021-12-02T08:22:56ZA Phenomenology of Social Stances10.13128/Phe_Mi-181562280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/f11d0f54ec914865ba90e42afc51f8312016-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7218https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 The paper develops a phenomenology of social stances, trying to show that Margaret Gilbert’s work on joint commitments can be understood as a special case of what here presented. The offered conceptualization shows that “to accept” is an important moment of social reality (as in Gilbert’s work), but also that there are many more stances to be discussed which are important. These are “to refuse” (or “to rebel against”), “to suffer”, “to assent” and “to make something one’s own”. The last part of the paper tests the explanatory power of the sketched theory, trying to show that it provides valuable elements for an account of convention. Gian Paolo TerravecchiaRosenberg & Sellierarticlesocial stancejoint commitmentacceptancerebellionAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 9 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR IT |
topic |
social stance joint commitment acceptance rebellion Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 |
spellingShingle |
social stance joint commitment acceptance rebellion Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Gian Paolo Terravecchia A Phenomenology of Social Stances |
description |
The paper develops a phenomenology of social stances, trying to show that Margaret Gilbert’s work on joint commitments can be understood as a special case of what here presented. The offered conceptualization shows that “to accept” is an important moment of social reality (as in Gilbert’s work), but also that there are many more stances to be discussed which are important. These are “to refuse” (or “to rebel against”), “to suffer”, “to assent” and “to make something one’s own”. The last part of the paper tests the explanatory power of the sketched theory, trying to show that it provides valuable elements for an account of convention.
|
format |
article |
author |
Gian Paolo Terravecchia |
author_facet |
Gian Paolo Terravecchia |
author_sort |
Gian Paolo Terravecchia |
title |
A Phenomenology of Social Stances |
title_short |
A Phenomenology of Social Stances |
title_full |
A Phenomenology of Social Stances |
title_fullStr |
A Phenomenology of Social Stances |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Phenomenology of Social Stances |
title_sort |
phenomenology of social stances |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f11d0f54ec914865ba90e42afc51f831 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gianpaoloterravecchia aphenomenologyofsocialstances AT gianpaoloterravecchia phenomenologyofsocialstances |
_version_ |
1718398579380322304 |