Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes
The present research addresses a comparative analysis among Additive (ARP) and Subtractive (SRP) rapid prototyping techniques, aiming to determine which approach presents greater technical and economic viability for physical prototype manufacturing. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteri...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2021-4-293 https://doaj.org/article/f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be16554 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be16554 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be165542021-12-01T22:06:09ZAdditive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes2217-26612683-345Xhttp://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2021-4-293https://doaj.org/article/f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be165542021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.ijiemjournal.uns.ac.rs/images/journal/volume12/IJIEM_293.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2217-2661https://doaj.org/toc/2683-345XThe present research addresses a comparative analysis among Additive (ARP) and Subtractive (SRP) rapid prototyping techniques, aiming to determine which approach presents greater technical and economic viability for physical prototype manufacturing. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteria decision method was used to categorize and quantify the analysis criteria. The analyzed Rapid Prototyping (RP) techniques were the Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling as SRP technique and the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process as ARP. The SRP rapid prototyping technique is the most suitable alternative for manufacturing prototypes, according to the analyzed evaluation criteria.Alvaro Neuenfeldt-JuniorMarlon CheiramMoacir EckhardtCristiano ScheuerJulio SilukMatheus FrancescattoUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciencesarticlesubtractive rapid prototypingadditive rapid prototypingrapid prototyping process selectionanalytic hierarchy processmulti-criteria decision analysisIndustrial engineering. Management engineeringT55.4-60.8ENInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 262-273 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
subtractive rapid prototyping additive rapid prototyping rapid prototyping process selection analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision analysis Industrial engineering. Management engineering T55.4-60.8 |
spellingShingle |
subtractive rapid prototyping additive rapid prototyping rapid prototyping process selection analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision analysis Industrial engineering. Management engineering T55.4-60.8 Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior Marlon Cheiram Moacir Eckhardt Cristiano Scheuer Julio Siluk Matheus Francescatto Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes |
description |
The present research addresses a comparative analysis among Additive (ARP) and Subtractive (SRP) rapid prototyping techniques, aiming to determine which approach presents greater technical and economic viability for physical prototype manufacturing. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteria decision method was used to categorize and quantify the analysis criteria. The analyzed Rapid Prototyping (RP) techniques were the Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling as SRP technique and the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process as ARP. The SRP rapid prototyping technique is the most suitable alternative for manufacturing prototypes, according to the analyzed evaluation criteria. |
format |
article |
author |
Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior Marlon Cheiram Moacir Eckhardt Cristiano Scheuer Julio Siluk Matheus Francescatto |
author_facet |
Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior Marlon Cheiram Moacir Eckhardt Cristiano Scheuer Julio Siluk Matheus Francescatto |
author_sort |
Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior |
title |
Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes |
title_short |
Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes |
title_full |
Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes |
title_fullStr |
Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes |
title_sort |
additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of fdm & cnc processes |
publisher |
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2021-4-293 https://doaj.org/article/f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be16554 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alvaroneuenfeldtjunior additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses AT marloncheiram additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses AT moacireckhardt additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses AT cristianoscheuer additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses AT juliosiluk additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses AT matheusfrancescatto additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses |
_version_ |
1718404197301354496 |