Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes

The present research addresses a comparative analysis among Additive (ARP) and Subtractive (SRP) rapid prototyping techniques, aiming to determine which approach presents greater technical and economic viability for physical prototype manufacturing. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteri...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior, Marlon Cheiram, Moacir Eckhardt, Cristiano Scheuer, Julio Siluk, Matheus Francescatto
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2021-4-293
https://doaj.org/article/f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be16554
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be16554
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be165542021-12-01T22:06:09ZAdditive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes2217-26612683-345Xhttp://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2021-4-293https://doaj.org/article/f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be165542021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.ijiemjournal.uns.ac.rs/images/journal/volume12/IJIEM_293.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2217-2661https://doaj.org/toc/2683-345XThe present research addresses a comparative analysis among Additive (ARP) and Subtractive (SRP) rapid prototyping techniques, aiming to determine which approach presents greater technical and economic viability for physical prototype manufacturing. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteria decision method was used to categorize and quantify the analysis criteria. The analyzed Rapid Prototyping (RP) techniques were the Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling as SRP technique and the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process as ARP. The SRP rapid prototyping technique is the most suitable alternative for manufacturing prototypes, according to the analyzed evaluation criteria.Alvaro Neuenfeldt-JuniorMarlon CheiramMoacir EckhardtCristiano ScheuerJulio SilukMatheus FrancescattoUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciencesarticlesubtractive rapid prototypingadditive rapid prototypingrapid prototyping process selectionanalytic hierarchy processmulti-criteria decision analysisIndustrial engineering. Management engineeringT55.4-60.8ENInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 262-273 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic subtractive rapid prototyping
additive rapid prototyping
rapid prototyping process selection
analytic hierarchy process
multi-criteria decision analysis
Industrial engineering. Management engineering
T55.4-60.8
spellingShingle subtractive rapid prototyping
additive rapid prototyping
rapid prototyping process selection
analytic hierarchy process
multi-criteria decision analysis
Industrial engineering. Management engineering
T55.4-60.8
Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior
Marlon Cheiram
Moacir Eckhardt
Cristiano Scheuer
Julio Siluk
Matheus Francescatto
Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes
description The present research addresses a comparative analysis among Additive (ARP) and Subtractive (SRP) rapid prototyping techniques, aiming to determine which approach presents greater technical and economic viability for physical prototype manufacturing. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteria decision method was used to categorize and quantify the analysis criteria. The analyzed Rapid Prototyping (RP) techniques were the Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling as SRP technique and the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process as ARP. The SRP rapid prototyping technique is the most suitable alternative for manufacturing prototypes, according to the analyzed evaluation criteria.
format article
author Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior
Marlon Cheiram
Moacir Eckhardt
Cristiano Scheuer
Julio Siluk
Matheus Francescatto
author_facet Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior
Marlon Cheiram
Moacir Eckhardt
Cristiano Scheuer
Julio Siluk
Matheus Francescatto
author_sort Alvaro Neuenfeldt-Junior
title Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes
title_short Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes
title_full Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes
title_fullStr Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes
title_full_unstemmed Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes
title_sort additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: a comparative analysis of fdm & cnc processes
publisher University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences
publishDate 2021
url http://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2021-4-293
https://doaj.org/article/f1b796d3a4ab425684be5e227be16554
work_keys_str_mv AT alvaroneuenfeldtjunior additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses
AT marloncheiram additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses
AT moacireckhardt additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses
AT cristianoscheuer additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses
AT juliosiluk additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses
AT matheusfrancescatto additiveandsubtractiverapidprototypingtechniquesacomparativeanalysisoffdmcncprocesses
_version_ 1718404197301354496