L’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal

How do stakeholders use their judgment, forge their opinions in public debates concerning socio-ecological issues? What kind of possibilities, but also what pitfalls may arise when resorting to outside expertise? Is there sufficient space provided for the confrontation of values, given that they wil...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Laurence Brière
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2013
Materias:	public debate environmental issues expertise political responsibility judgment values Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f238d5d6db5447ad87ec076f0837d09b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f238d5d6db5447ad87ec076f0837d09b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f238d5d6db5447ad87ec076f0837d09b2021-12-02T10:00:29ZL’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal1492-844210.4000/vertigo.14000https://doaj.org/article/f238d5d6db5447ad87ec076f0837d09b2013-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14000https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442How do stakeholders use their judgment, forge their opinions in public debates concerning socio-ecological issues? What kind of possibilities, but also what pitfalls may arise when resorting to outside expertise? Is there sufficient space provided for the confrontation of values, given that they will necessarily guide collective projects? Analyzing the public debate surrounding the reconstruction of Montreal’s Turcot interchange, but also theoretical and philosophical contributions – among others Hannah Arendt’s concepts of responsibility and judgment – we discuss ethical and political issues raised by those questions. In a creative perspective, and looking towards the development of a learning society, we suggest that expertise should be mobilized in a broader, shared, critical and reflexive exercise. Laurence BrièreÉditions en environnement VertigOarticlepublic debateenvironmental issuesexpertisepolitical responsibilityjudgmentvaluesEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 13, Iss 2 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	public debate environmental issues expertise political responsibility judgment values Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	public debate environmental issues expertise political responsibility judgment values Environmental sciences GE1-350 Laurence Brière L’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal
description	How do stakeholders use their judgment, forge their opinions in public debates concerning socio-ecological issues? What kind of possibilities, but also what pitfalls may arise when resorting to outside expertise? Is there sufficient space provided for the confrontation of values, given that they will necessarily guide collective projects? Analyzing the public debate surrounding the reconstruction of Montreal’s Turcot interchange, but also theoretical and philosophical contributions – among others Hannah Arendt’s concepts of responsibility and judgment – we discuss ethical and political issues raised by those questions. In a creative perspective, and looking towards the development of a learning society, we suggest that expertise should be mobilized in a broader, shared, critical and reflexive exercise.
format	article
author	Laurence Brière
author_facet	Laurence Brière
author_sort	Laurence Brière
title	L’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal
title_short	L’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal
title_full	L’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal
title_fullStr	L’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal
title_full_unstemmed	L’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal
title_sort	l’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur turcot à montréal
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/f238d5d6db5447ad87ec076f0837d09b
work_keys_str_mv	AT laurencebriere lexercicedujugementdanslesdebatspublicsexpertiseslecasdelareconstructiondelechangeurturcotamontreal
_version_	1718397858544091136

L’exercice du jugement dans les débats publics expertisés : le cas de la reconstruction de l’échangeur Turcot à Montréal

Ejemplares similares