Water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation

This paper is a comparison of water vapor resistance (Ret) measured using the Permetest skin model and Tore sweating thermal manikin, i.e. 2D versus 3D methods; and to study the relationship between them. Three materials and five air gap distances were used for the measurement between these two devi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Frederick Fung, Chuansi Gao, Lubos Hes, Vladimir Bajzik
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	TU Dresden; Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering;Chair of Development and Assembly of Textile Products 2020
Materias:	thermal manikin water vapor resistance air gap permetest sweating Textile bleaching, dyeing, printing, etc. TP890-933 Engineering machinery, tools, and implements TA213-215
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f25901b032b343e9a9ae1fd7de9d15b6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f25901b032b343e9a9ae1fd7de9d15b6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f25901b032b343e9a9ae1fd7de9d15b62021-11-08T17:12:34ZWater vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation2701-939X10.25367/cdatp.2020.1.p65-73https://doaj.org/article/f25901b032b343e9a9ae1fd7de9d15b62020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.qucosa.de/cdatp/article/view/12https://doaj.org/toc/2701-939XThis paper is a comparison of water vapor resistance (Ret) measured using the Permetest skin model and Tore sweating thermal manikin, i.e. 2D versus 3D methods; and to study the relationship between them. Three materials and five air gap distances were used for the measurement between these two devices, the test conditions in the climatic chambers were set up according to the ISO standard of each measurement method. Results of the correlation coefficient of three materials showed that they all had a strong increasing trend between Permetest and the sweating thermal manikin. From the regression analysis, the P-value of all three materials showed that P< 0.05 and 100% cotton R2=0.83, 50% cotton 50% polyester R2=0.91, 100% polyester R2=0.99. However, Ret resulting values from each device slowed down after 12mm air gap distance.Frederick FungChuansi GaoLubos HesVladimir BajzikTU Dresden; Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering;Chair of Development and Assembly of Textile Productsarticlethermal manikinwater vapor resistanceair gappermetestsweating Textile bleaching, dyeing, printing, etc.TP890-933Engineering machinery, tools, and implementsTA213-215ENCommunications in Development and Assembling of Textile Products, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 65-73 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	thermal manikin water vapor resistance air gap permetest sweating Textile bleaching, dyeing, printing, etc. TP890-933 Engineering machinery, tools, and implements TA213-215
spellingShingle	thermal manikin water vapor resistance air gap permetest sweating Textile bleaching, dyeing, printing, etc. TP890-933 Engineering machinery, tools, and implements TA213-215 Frederick Fung Chuansi Gao Lubos Hes Vladimir Bajzik Water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation
description	This paper is a comparison of water vapor resistance (Ret) measured using the Permetest skin model and Tore sweating thermal manikin, i.e. 2D versus 3D methods; and to study the relationship between them. Three materials and five air gap distances were used for the measurement between these two devices, the test conditions in the climatic chambers were set up according to the ISO standard of each measurement method. Results of the correlation coefficient of three materials showed that they all had a strong increasing trend between Permetest and the sweating thermal manikin. From the regression analysis, the P-value of all three materials showed that P< 0.05 and 100% cotton R2=0.83, 50% cotton 50% polyester R2=0.91, 100% polyester R2=0.99. However, Ret resulting values from each device slowed down after 12mm air gap distance.
format	article
author	Frederick Fung Chuansi Gao Lubos Hes Vladimir Bajzik
author_facet	Frederick Fung Chuansi Gao Lubos Hes Vladimir Bajzik
author_sort	Frederick Fung
title	Water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation
title_short	Water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation
title_full	Water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation
title_fullStr	Water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation
title_full_unstemmed	Water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation
title_sort	water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and permetest skin model in the vertical orientation
publisher	TU Dresden; Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering;Chair of Development and Assembly of Textile Products
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/f25901b032b343e9a9ae1fd7de9d15b6
work_keys_str_mv	AT frederickfung watervaporresistancemeasuredonsweatingthermalmanikinandpermetestskinmodelintheverticalorientation AT chuansigao watervaporresistancemeasuredonsweatingthermalmanikinandpermetestskinmodelintheverticalorientation AT luboshes watervaporresistancemeasuredonsweatingthermalmanikinandpermetestskinmodelintheverticalorientation AT vladimirbajzik watervaporresistancemeasuredonsweatingthermalmanikinandpermetestskinmodelintheverticalorientation
_version_	1718441531417821184

Water vapor resistance measured on sweating thermal manikin and Permetest skin model in the vertical orientation

Ejemplares similares