Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome

Background Data: In spite of being successful, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACDF has some complications, among them, pseudoarthrosis, implant failure, and adjacent level disease. Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) are motion-preserving implants started to take part in treating cervical spond...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moataz A Elawady, MD., Ramy Taema, MD., Mahmoud M Wahdan, MD.
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Egyptian Spine Association 2020
Materias:
dci
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f2bef18489f34541b8ceb872b83e9470
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f2bef18489f34541b8ceb872b83e9470
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f2bef18489f34541b8ceb872b83e94702021-12-02T08:11:17ZDynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome10.21608/esj.2020.21585.11172314-89502314-8969https://doaj.org/article/f2bef18489f34541b8ceb872b83e94702020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_93884_6b88b2967216acb40a3dc5a2e08d9a67.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969Background Data: In spite of being successful, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACDF has some complications, among them, pseudoarthrosis, implant failure, and adjacent level disease. Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) are motion-preserving implants started to take part in treating cervical spondylotic disease with promising results. Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of ACDF versus DCI in patients with degenerative cervical radiculo- and/or myelopathy. Study Design: A prospective randomized controlled study. Patients and Methods: Forty patients with cervical spondylotic radiculo- and/or myelopathy were recruited for this study. They were 21 males and 19 females with mean age of 45±8.9 years. They were randomly allocated for either the ACDF group including 20 patients undergoing ACDF using PEEK cages or the DCI group including 20 patients using DCI. Clinical outcome parameters were brachialgia VAS and NDI, and radiological outcome parameters were fusion rate, adjacent level changes, and segmental mobility. Results: The mean follow-up was 20±4 months. The mean VAS of brachialgia decreased from 8.7 preoperatively to 6.6 postoperatively in ACDF group, while it decreased from 8.8 to 6.4 in DCI with no significant differences in both groups. The mean NDI improved from 24.7±1.6 to 16.2±1.8 in ACDF group and from 23.9±2.1 to 15.8±2.0 in DCI group, with no significant difference in both groups. Fusin rate was 100% in ACDF group. Radiologically, adjacent level changes were reported in 5 (25%) patients in ACDF group, while these changes were only observed in 1 patient (5%) of the DCI group. Segmental mobility was preserved in all patients in the DCI group but was lost in 3 patients at final follow-up visit. Conclusion: Although clinical outcomes of both ACDF and DCI groups were not significantly different at final follow-up, radiographic parameters were relatively better in DCI group compared to ACDF group including segmental mobility preservation and adjacent level changes. (2019ESJ198) Moataz A Elawady, MD.Ramy Taema, MD.Mahmoud M Wahdan, MD.Egyptian Spine Associationarticleacdfdcicervical spondylosisradiculopathymyelopathyNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENEgyptian Spine Journal, Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 45-53 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic acdf
dci
cervical spondylosis
radiculopathy
myelopathy
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle acdf
dci
cervical spondylosis
radiculopathy
myelopathy
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Moataz A Elawady, MD.
Ramy Taema, MD.
Mahmoud M Wahdan, MD.
Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome
description Background Data: In spite of being successful, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACDF has some complications, among them, pseudoarthrosis, implant failure, and adjacent level disease. Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) are motion-preserving implants started to take part in treating cervical spondylotic disease with promising results. Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of ACDF versus DCI in patients with degenerative cervical radiculo- and/or myelopathy. Study Design: A prospective randomized controlled study. Patients and Methods: Forty patients with cervical spondylotic radiculo- and/or myelopathy were recruited for this study. They were 21 males and 19 females with mean age of 45±8.9 years. They were randomly allocated for either the ACDF group including 20 patients undergoing ACDF using PEEK cages or the DCI group including 20 patients using DCI. Clinical outcome parameters were brachialgia VAS and NDI, and radiological outcome parameters were fusion rate, adjacent level changes, and segmental mobility. Results: The mean follow-up was 20±4 months. The mean VAS of brachialgia decreased from 8.7 preoperatively to 6.6 postoperatively in ACDF group, while it decreased from 8.8 to 6.4 in DCI with no significant differences in both groups. The mean NDI improved from 24.7±1.6 to 16.2±1.8 in ACDF group and from 23.9±2.1 to 15.8±2.0 in DCI group, with no significant difference in both groups. Fusin rate was 100% in ACDF group. Radiologically, adjacent level changes were reported in 5 (25%) patients in ACDF group, while these changes were only observed in 1 patient (5%) of the DCI group. Segmental mobility was preserved in all patients in the DCI group but was lost in 3 patients at final follow-up visit. Conclusion: Although clinical outcomes of both ACDF and DCI groups were not significantly different at final follow-up, radiographic parameters were relatively better in DCI group compared to ACDF group including segmental mobility preservation and adjacent level changes. (2019ESJ198)
format article
author Moataz A Elawady, MD.
Ramy Taema, MD.
Mahmoud M Wahdan, MD.
author_facet Moataz A Elawady, MD.
Ramy Taema, MD.
Mahmoud M Wahdan, MD.
author_sort Moataz A Elawady, MD.
title Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome
title_short Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome
title_full Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome
title_fullStr Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome
title_sort dynamic cervical implants (dci) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (acdf) in single-level cervical disc disease (cdd): clinical and radiographic outcome
publisher Egyptian Spine Association
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/f2bef18489f34541b8ceb872b83e9470
work_keys_str_mv AT moatazaelawadymd dynamiccervicalimplantsdciversusanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdfinsinglelevelcervicaldiscdiseasecddclinicalandradiographicoutcome
AT ramytaemamd dynamiccervicalimplantsdciversusanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdfinsinglelevelcervicaldiscdiseasecddclinicalandradiographicoutcome
AT mahmoudmwahdanmd dynamiccervicalimplantsdciversusanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdfinsinglelevelcervicaldiscdiseasecddclinicalandradiographicoutcome
_version_ 1718398638569291776