Comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis

Abstract Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease. The few studies on MBC reported conflicting data regarding survival outcomes compared to women. This study has two objectives: to describe the characteristics of a single-cohort of MBC and to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serena Scomersi, Fabiola Giudici, Giuseppe Cacciatore, Pasquale Losurdo, Stefano Fracon, Sara Cortinovis, Rita Ceccherini, Fabrizio Zanconati, Maura Tonutti, Marina Bortul
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f2e26c2d1ce44e4fbd5d17137303fee2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f2e26c2d1ce44e4fbd5d17137303fee2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f2e26c2d1ce44e4fbd5d17137303fee22021-12-02T15:56:41ZComparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis10.1038/s41598-021-91131-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f2e26c2d1ce44e4fbd5d17137303fee22021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91131-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease. The few studies on MBC reported conflicting data regarding survival outcomes compared to women. This study has two objectives: to describe the characteristics of a single-cohort of MBC and to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between men and women using the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. We considered MBC patients (n = 40) diagnosed between January 2004 and May 2019. Clinical, pathological, oncological and follow-up data were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors on OS and DFS for MBC. We selected female patients with BC (n = 2678). To minimize the effect of the imbalance of the prognostic factors between the two cohorts, the PSM method (1:3 ratio) was applied and differences in survival between the two groups were assessed. The average age of MBC patients was 73 years. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 76.7% and 72.2% respectively. The prognostic factors that significantly influenced OS and DFS were tumor size and lymph node status. After the PSM, 5 year-OS was similar between MBC and FBC (72.9% vs 72.3%, p = 0.70) while we found a worse DFS for MBC (72.2% vs 91.4%, p  = 0.03). Our data confirmed previous reported MBC characteristics: we found a higher risk of recurrence in MBC compared to FMC but similar OS. MBC and FMC are different entities and studies are needed to understand its epidemiology and guide its management.Serena ScomersiFabiola GiudiciGiuseppe CacciatorePasquale LosurdoStefano FraconSara CortinovisRita CeccheriniFabrizio ZanconatiMaura TonuttiMarina BortulNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Serena Scomersi
Fabiola Giudici
Giuseppe Cacciatore
Pasquale Losurdo
Stefano Fracon
Sara Cortinovis
Rita Ceccherini
Fabrizio Zanconati
Maura Tonutti
Marina Bortul
Comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis
description Abstract Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease. The few studies on MBC reported conflicting data regarding survival outcomes compared to women. This study has two objectives: to describe the characteristics of a single-cohort of MBC and to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between men and women using the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. We considered MBC patients (n = 40) diagnosed between January 2004 and May 2019. Clinical, pathological, oncological and follow-up data were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors on OS and DFS for MBC. We selected female patients with BC (n = 2678). To minimize the effect of the imbalance of the prognostic factors between the two cohorts, the PSM method (1:3 ratio) was applied and differences in survival between the two groups were assessed. The average age of MBC patients was 73 years. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 76.7% and 72.2% respectively. The prognostic factors that significantly influenced OS and DFS were tumor size and lymph node status. After the PSM, 5 year-OS was similar between MBC and FBC (72.9% vs 72.3%, p = 0.70) while we found a worse DFS for MBC (72.2% vs 91.4%, p  = 0.03). Our data confirmed previous reported MBC characteristics: we found a higher risk of recurrence in MBC compared to FMC but similar OS. MBC and FMC are different entities and studies are needed to understand its epidemiology and guide its management.
format article
author Serena Scomersi
Fabiola Giudici
Giuseppe Cacciatore
Pasquale Losurdo
Stefano Fracon
Sara Cortinovis
Rita Ceccherini
Fabrizio Zanconati
Maura Tonutti
Marina Bortul
author_facet Serena Scomersi
Fabiola Giudici
Giuseppe Cacciatore
Pasquale Losurdo
Stefano Fracon
Sara Cortinovis
Rita Ceccherini
Fabrizio Zanconati
Maura Tonutti
Marina Bortul
author_sort Serena Scomersi
title Comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis
title_short Comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis
title_full Comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr Comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis
title_sort comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f2e26c2d1ce44e4fbd5d17137303fee2
work_keys_str_mv AT serenascomersi comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT fabiolagiudici comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT giuseppecacciatore comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT pasqualelosurdo comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT stefanofracon comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT saracortinovis comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT ritaceccherini comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT fabriziozanconati comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT mauratonutti comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT marinabortul comparisonbetweenmaleandfemalebreastcancersurvivalusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
_version_ 1718385427423952896