Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study

Previous studies have demonstrated that students have difficulties in applying the wave model of light to explain single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference patterns. In this study, we investigated if students could recognize typical interference and diffraction patterns at all. Eye moveme...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ana Susac, Maja Planinic, Andreja Bubic, Lana Ivanjek, Marijan Palmovic
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e12540
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e12540
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e125402021-12-02T12:11:30ZStudent recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.0201332469-9896https://doaj.org/article/f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e125402020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020133http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020133https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896Previous studies have demonstrated that students have difficulties in applying the wave model of light to explain single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference patterns. In this study, we investigated if students could recognize typical interference and diffraction patterns at all. Eye movements of high-school students were measured while they were identifying patterns produced by monochromatic light on a double slit, single slit, and diffraction grating, and by white light on a diffraction grating. Most students had difficulties with recognizing double-slit interference pattern and diffraction grating pattern of monochromatic light. Identification of the single-slit diffraction pattern was easier probably due to its distinguishable central maximum. The easiest task for students was recognizing the diffraction pattern of white light on an optical grating. Eye-tracking data suggested that even students who incorrectly answered this question were aware that the diffraction grating separates white light into colors. Additionally, eye tracking revealed that students who identified patterns correctly attended more the correct pattern than other options, thus corroborating previous findings. Overall, the results indicate that the recognition of interference and diffraction patterns is quite demanding for students, suggesting that more attention should be paid to observing and understanding basic wave optics phenomena.Ana SusacMaja PlaninicAndreja BubicLana IvanjekMarijan PalmovicAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 16, Iss 2, p 020133 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Ana Susac
Maja Planinic
Andreja Bubic
Lana Ivanjek
Marijan Palmovic
Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study
description Previous studies have demonstrated that students have difficulties in applying the wave model of light to explain single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference patterns. In this study, we investigated if students could recognize typical interference and diffraction patterns at all. Eye movements of high-school students were measured while they were identifying patterns produced by monochromatic light on a double slit, single slit, and diffraction grating, and by white light on a diffraction grating. Most students had difficulties with recognizing double-slit interference pattern and diffraction grating pattern of monochromatic light. Identification of the single-slit diffraction pattern was easier probably due to its distinguishable central maximum. The easiest task for students was recognizing the diffraction pattern of white light on an optical grating. Eye-tracking data suggested that even students who incorrectly answered this question were aware that the diffraction grating separates white light into colors. Additionally, eye tracking revealed that students who identified patterns correctly attended more the correct pattern than other options, thus corroborating previous findings. Overall, the results indicate that the recognition of interference and diffraction patterns is quite demanding for students, suggesting that more attention should be paid to observing and understanding basic wave optics phenomena.
format article
author Ana Susac
Maja Planinic
Andreja Bubic
Lana Ivanjek
Marijan Palmovic
author_facet Ana Susac
Maja Planinic
Andreja Bubic
Lana Ivanjek
Marijan Palmovic
author_sort Ana Susac
title Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study
title_short Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study
title_full Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study
title_fullStr Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study
title_full_unstemmed Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study
title_sort student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: an eye-tracking study
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e12540
work_keys_str_mv AT anasusac studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy
AT majaplaninic studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy
AT andrejabubic studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy
AT lanaivanjek studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy
AT marijanpalmovic studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy
_version_ 1718394666570743808