Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study
Previous studies have demonstrated that students have difficulties in applying the wave model of light to explain single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference patterns. In this study, we investigated if students could recognize typical interference and diffraction patterns at all. Eye moveme...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Physical Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e12540 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e12540 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e125402021-12-02T12:11:30ZStudent recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.0201332469-9896https://doaj.org/article/f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e125402020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020133http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020133https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896Previous studies have demonstrated that students have difficulties in applying the wave model of light to explain single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference patterns. In this study, we investigated if students could recognize typical interference and diffraction patterns at all. Eye movements of high-school students were measured while they were identifying patterns produced by monochromatic light on a double slit, single slit, and diffraction grating, and by white light on a diffraction grating. Most students had difficulties with recognizing double-slit interference pattern and diffraction grating pattern of monochromatic light. Identification of the single-slit diffraction pattern was easier probably due to its distinguishable central maximum. The easiest task for students was recognizing the diffraction pattern of white light on an optical grating. Eye-tracking data suggested that even students who incorrectly answered this question were aware that the diffraction grating separates white light into colors. Additionally, eye tracking revealed that students who identified patterns correctly attended more the correct pattern than other options, thus corroborating previous findings. Overall, the results indicate that the recognition of interference and diffraction patterns is quite demanding for students, suggesting that more attention should be paid to observing and understanding basic wave optics phenomena.Ana SusacMaja PlaninicAndreja BubicLana IvanjekMarijan PalmovicAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 16, Iss 2, p 020133 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Physics QC1-999 |
spellingShingle |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Physics QC1-999 Ana Susac Maja Planinic Andreja Bubic Lana Ivanjek Marijan Palmovic Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study |
description |
Previous studies have demonstrated that students have difficulties in applying the wave model of light to explain single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference patterns. In this study, we investigated if students could recognize typical interference and diffraction patterns at all. Eye movements of high-school students were measured while they were identifying patterns produced by monochromatic light on a double slit, single slit, and diffraction grating, and by white light on a diffraction grating. Most students had difficulties with recognizing double-slit interference pattern and diffraction grating pattern of monochromatic light. Identification of the single-slit diffraction pattern was easier probably due to its distinguishable central maximum. The easiest task for students was recognizing the diffraction pattern of white light on an optical grating. Eye-tracking data suggested that even students who incorrectly answered this question were aware that the diffraction grating separates white light into colors. Additionally, eye tracking revealed that students who identified patterns correctly attended more the correct pattern than other options, thus corroborating previous findings. Overall, the results indicate that the recognition of interference and diffraction patterns is quite demanding for students, suggesting that more attention should be paid to observing and understanding basic wave optics phenomena. |
format |
article |
author |
Ana Susac Maja Planinic Andreja Bubic Lana Ivanjek Marijan Palmovic |
author_facet |
Ana Susac Maja Planinic Andreja Bubic Lana Ivanjek Marijan Palmovic |
author_sort |
Ana Susac |
title |
Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study |
title_short |
Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study |
title_full |
Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study |
title_fullStr |
Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: An eye-tracking study |
title_sort |
student recognition of interference and diffraction patterns: an eye-tracking study |
publisher |
American Physical Society |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f2e383bdfbc24df7bead51af04e12540 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anasusac studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy AT majaplaninic studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy AT andrejabubic studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy AT lanaivanjek studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy AT marijanpalmovic studentrecognitionofinterferenceanddiffractionpatternsaneyetrackingstudy |
_version_ |
1718394666570743808 |