Outcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study
Abstract The interest in social cognition in schizophrenia is justified by the relationship between deficits in these skills and negative functional outcomes. Although assessment batteries have already been described, there is no consensus about which measures are useful in predicting patient functi...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f3317d3c27334ca780ba50a84f63a655 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f3317d3c27334ca780ba50a84f63a655 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f3317d3c27334ca780ba50a84f63a6552021-12-02T15:49:39ZOutcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study10.1038/s41537-021-00160-52334-265Xhttps://doaj.org/article/f3317d3c27334ca780ba50a84f63a6552021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00160-5https://doaj.org/toc/2334-265XAbstract The interest in social cognition in schizophrenia is justified by the relationship between deficits in these skills and negative functional outcomes. Although assessment batteries have already been described, there is no consensus about which measures are useful in predicting patient functioning or quality of life (QoL). We investigated a set of five measures of recognition of facial emotions, theory of mind (ToM), and empathy in a cohort of 143 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder at inclusion and, amongst whom 79 were reassessed 1 year later. The distribution was satisfactory for the TREF (Facial Emotion Recognition Task), V-SIR (Versailles-Situational Intention Reading), and QCAE (Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy). Internal consistency was satisfactory for the TREF, V-SIR, V-Comics (Versailles Intention Attribution Task), and QCAE. Sensitivity to change was acceptable for the TREF. The TREF and V-SIR showed a cross-sectional relationship with functioning beyond the clinical symptoms of schizophrenia but not beyond neurocognition. Moreover, the TREF and V-SIR at inclusion could not predict functioning one year later, whereas most neurocognitive and clinical dimensions at inclusion could. Finally, only affective QCAE showed a significant cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, association with QoL. In conclusion, the TREF had satisfactory psychometric properties and showed a cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, association with objective outcome measures, thus appearing to be reliable in clinical practice and research. The V-SIR also showed promising psychometric properties, despite a possible weakness to detect change. However, these measures should be interpreted within the context of the good predictive power of the neurocognitive and clinical status on the outcome.Eric Brunet-GouetCapucine Decaix-TisserandMathieu UrbachNadine BazinBruno AouizerateLore BrunelDelphine CapdevielleIsabelle ChereauCaroline DubertretJulien DubreucqGuillaume FondChristophe LançonSylvain LeignierJasmina MalletDavid MisdrahiSylvie PiresPriscille SchneiderFranck SchurhoffHanan YazbekAnna Zinetti-BertschyChristine PasserieuxPaul RouxNature PortfolioarticlePsychiatryRC435-571ENnpj Schizophrenia, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Psychiatry RC435-571 |
| spellingShingle |
Psychiatry RC435-571 Eric Brunet-Gouet Capucine Decaix-Tisserand Mathieu Urbach Nadine Bazin Bruno Aouizerate Lore Brunel Delphine Capdevielle Isabelle Chereau Caroline Dubertret Julien Dubreucq Guillaume Fond Christophe Lançon Sylvain Leignier Jasmina Mallet David Misdrahi Sylvie Pires Priscille Schneider Franck Schurhoff Hanan Yazbek Anna Zinetti-Bertschy Christine Passerieux Paul Roux Outcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study |
| description |
Abstract The interest in social cognition in schizophrenia is justified by the relationship between deficits in these skills and negative functional outcomes. Although assessment batteries have already been described, there is no consensus about which measures are useful in predicting patient functioning or quality of life (QoL). We investigated a set of five measures of recognition of facial emotions, theory of mind (ToM), and empathy in a cohort of 143 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder at inclusion and, amongst whom 79 were reassessed 1 year later. The distribution was satisfactory for the TREF (Facial Emotion Recognition Task), V-SIR (Versailles-Situational Intention Reading), and QCAE (Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy). Internal consistency was satisfactory for the TREF, V-SIR, V-Comics (Versailles Intention Attribution Task), and QCAE. Sensitivity to change was acceptable for the TREF. The TREF and V-SIR showed a cross-sectional relationship with functioning beyond the clinical symptoms of schizophrenia but not beyond neurocognition. Moreover, the TREF and V-SIR at inclusion could not predict functioning one year later, whereas most neurocognitive and clinical dimensions at inclusion could. Finally, only affective QCAE showed a significant cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, association with QoL. In conclusion, the TREF had satisfactory psychometric properties and showed a cross-sectional, but not longitudinal, association with objective outcome measures, thus appearing to be reliable in clinical practice and research. The V-SIR also showed promising psychometric properties, despite a possible weakness to detect change. However, these measures should be interpreted within the context of the good predictive power of the neurocognitive and clinical status on the outcome. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Eric Brunet-Gouet Capucine Decaix-Tisserand Mathieu Urbach Nadine Bazin Bruno Aouizerate Lore Brunel Delphine Capdevielle Isabelle Chereau Caroline Dubertret Julien Dubreucq Guillaume Fond Christophe Lançon Sylvain Leignier Jasmina Mallet David Misdrahi Sylvie Pires Priscille Schneider Franck Schurhoff Hanan Yazbek Anna Zinetti-Bertschy Christine Passerieux Paul Roux |
| author_facet |
Eric Brunet-Gouet Capucine Decaix-Tisserand Mathieu Urbach Nadine Bazin Bruno Aouizerate Lore Brunel Delphine Capdevielle Isabelle Chereau Caroline Dubertret Julien Dubreucq Guillaume Fond Christophe Lançon Sylvain Leignier Jasmina Mallet David Misdrahi Sylvie Pires Priscille Schneider Franck Schurhoff Hanan Yazbek Anna Zinetti-Bertschy Christine Passerieux Paul Roux |
| author_sort |
Eric Brunet-Gouet |
| title |
Outcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study |
| title_short |
Outcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study |
| title_full |
Outcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study |
| title_fullStr |
Outcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Outcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study |
| title_sort |
outcome prediction with a social cognitive battery: a multicenter longitudinal study |
| publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/f3317d3c27334ca780ba50a84f63a655 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT ericbrunetgouet outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT capucinedecaixtisserand outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT mathieuurbach outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT nadinebazin outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT brunoaouizerate outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT lorebrunel outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT delphinecapdevielle outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT isabellechereau outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT carolinedubertret outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT juliendubreucq outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT guillaumefond outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT christophelancon outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT sylvainleignier outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT jasminamallet outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT davidmisdrahi outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT sylviepires outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT priscilleschneider outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT franckschurhoff outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT hananyazbek outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT annazinettibertschy outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT christinepasserieux outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy AT paulroux outcomepredictionwithasocialcognitivebatteryamulticenterlongitudinalstudy |
| _version_ |
1718385726339416064 |