Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat

The purpose of this research is to (1) analyze the Supreme Court's consideration of victims of the spread of sordid chatter in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018, and (2) analyze the arguments of the Public Prosecutor regarding the offense Article 27 paragraph (1) ju...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rachmadan Eka Cipta, Ali Masyhar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ID
Publicado: Universitas Negeri Semarang 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38746
https://doaj.org/article/f3502d2a548d43b7b1fc2a4670a15c2b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f3502d2a548d43b7b1fc2a4670a15c2b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f3502d2a548d43b7b1fc2a4670a15c2b2021-12-05T04:42:11ZControversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chathttps://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.387462252-6536https://doaj.org/article/f3502d2a548d43b7b1fc2a4670a15c2b2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ulj/article/view/38746https://doaj.org/toc/2252-6536The purpose of this research is to (1) analyze the Supreme Court's consideration of victims of the spread of sordid chatter in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018, and (2) analyze the arguments of the Public Prosecutor regarding the offense Article 27 paragraph (1) juncto Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. This type of research uses qualitative methods with a normative juridical approach. In this method, secondary data uses the decision of the Mataram District Court Number: 265 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.MTR and the decision of the Supreme Court Number 574 K / Pid.Sus / 2018. Primary data to support this research were obtained from interviews of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Institute for Criminal Justie Reform. Results and discussion of research (1) The values ​​underlying the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018 and (2) the Prosecutor's argument The Public Prosecutor related to offense Article 27 paragraph (1) jo Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in the decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. Overall it can be concluded that (1) The value underlying the Supreme Court in passing this decision is that the judge tries to apply the benefits of the law. (2) The Public Prosecutor's Arguments in indicting or in prosecution cannot describe the offenses that are charged to the defendant, this is a serious record in the first-level court of the indictment and the demands of the Public Prosecutor are declared unproven on the defendant.Rachmadan Eka CiptaAli MasyharUniversitas Negeri Semarangarticlecriminal lawimmoral chatvictimLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENIDUnnes Law Journal, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 23-46 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ID
topic criminal law
immoral chat
victim
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
spellingShingle criminal law
immoral chat
victim
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Rachmadan Eka Cipta
Ali Masyhar
Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat
description The purpose of this research is to (1) analyze the Supreme Court's consideration of victims of the spread of sordid chatter in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018, and (2) analyze the arguments of the Public Prosecutor regarding the offense Article 27 paragraph (1) juncto Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. This type of research uses qualitative methods with a normative juridical approach. In this method, secondary data uses the decision of the Mataram District Court Number: 265 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN.MTR and the decision of the Supreme Court Number 574 K / Pid.Sus / 2018. Primary data to support this research were obtained from interviews of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Institute for Criminal Justie Reform. Results and discussion of research (1) The values ​​underlying the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court's decision Number 574K / PID.SUS / 2018 and (2) the Prosecutor's argument The Public Prosecutor related to offense Article 27 paragraph (1) jo Article 45 paragraph (1) of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law in the decision No. 574K / PID.SUS / 2018. Overall it can be concluded that (1) The value underlying the Supreme Court in passing this decision is that the judge tries to apply the benefits of the law. (2) The Public Prosecutor's Arguments in indicting or in prosecution cannot describe the offenses that are charged to the defendant, this is a serious record in the first-level court of the indictment and the demands of the Public Prosecutor are declared unproven on the defendant.
format article
author Rachmadan Eka Cipta
Ali Masyhar
author_facet Rachmadan Eka Cipta
Ali Masyhar
author_sort Rachmadan Eka Cipta
title Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat
title_short Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat
title_full Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat
title_fullStr Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat
title_full_unstemmed Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat
title_sort controversial criminal punishment for victim of the spread of immoral chat
publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38746
https://doaj.org/article/f3502d2a548d43b7b1fc2a4670a15c2b
work_keys_str_mv AT rachmadanekacipta controversialcriminalpunishmentforvictimofthespreadofimmoralchat
AT alimasyhar controversialcriminalpunishmentforvictimofthespreadofimmoralchat
_version_ 1718372651102109696