Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC
Abstract The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e6738 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e6738 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e67382021-12-02T15:08:15ZMolecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC10.1038/s41598-018-33963-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e67382018-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33963-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be selectively bound by AdiC for transport into the cytosol. In this study, we shed light on the mechanism through which AdiC distinguishes Arg+ from Arg2+ of arginine by investigating the binding of both forms in addition to that of divalent agmatine, using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations with molecular and quantum mechanics calculations. We show that AdiC indeed preferentially binds Arg+. The weaker binding of divalent compounds results mostly from their greater tendency to remain hydrated than Arg+. Our data suggests that the binding of Arg+ promotes the deprotonation of Glu208, a gating residue, which in turn reinforces its interactions with AdiC, leading to longer residence times of Arg+ in the binding site. Although the total electric charge of the ligand appears to be the determinant factor in the discrimination process, two local interactions formed with Trp293, another gating residue of the binding site, also contribute to the selection mechanism: a cation-π interaction with the guanidinium group of Arg+ and an anion-π interaction involving Glu208.Eva-Maria KrammerAndrew GibbonsGoedele RoosMartine PrévostNature PortfolioarticleGating ResiduesDivalent CompoundsAgmatineDivalent LigandSolvation Free EnergyMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Gating Residues Divalent Compounds Agmatine Divalent Ligand Solvation Free Energy Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Gating Residues Divalent Compounds Agmatine Divalent Ligand Solvation Free Energy Medicine R Science Q Eva-Maria Krammer Andrew Gibbons Goedele Roos Martine Prévost Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
description |
Abstract The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be selectively bound by AdiC for transport into the cytosol. In this study, we shed light on the mechanism through which AdiC distinguishes Arg+ from Arg2+ of arginine by investigating the binding of both forms in addition to that of divalent agmatine, using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations with molecular and quantum mechanics calculations. We show that AdiC indeed preferentially binds Arg+. The weaker binding of divalent compounds results mostly from their greater tendency to remain hydrated than Arg+. Our data suggests that the binding of Arg+ promotes the deprotonation of Glu208, a gating residue, which in turn reinforces its interactions with AdiC, leading to longer residence times of Arg+ in the binding site. Although the total electric charge of the ligand appears to be the determinant factor in the discrimination process, two local interactions formed with Trp293, another gating residue of the binding site, also contribute to the selection mechanism: a cation-π interaction with the guanidinium group of Arg+ and an anion-π interaction involving Glu208. |
format |
article |
author |
Eva-Maria Krammer Andrew Gibbons Goedele Roos Martine Prévost |
author_facet |
Eva-Maria Krammer Andrew Gibbons Goedele Roos Martine Prévost |
author_sort |
Eva-Maria Krammer |
title |
Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_short |
Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_full |
Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_fullStr |
Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_full_unstemmed |
Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_sort |
molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine antiporter adic |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e6738 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT evamariakrammer molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic AT andrewgibbons molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic AT goedeleroos molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic AT martineprevost molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic |
_version_ |
1718388227503554560 |