Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC

Abstract The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eva-Maria Krammer, Andrew Gibbons, Goedele Roos, Martine Prévost
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e6738
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e6738
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e67382021-12-02T15:08:15ZMolecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC10.1038/s41598-018-33963-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e67382018-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33963-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be selectively bound by AdiC for transport into the cytosol. In this study, we shed light on the mechanism through which AdiC distinguishes Arg+ from Arg2+ of arginine by investigating the binding of both forms in addition to that of divalent agmatine, using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations with molecular and quantum mechanics calculations. We show that AdiC indeed preferentially binds Arg+. The weaker binding of divalent compounds results mostly from their greater tendency to remain hydrated than Arg+. Our data suggests that the binding of Arg+ promotes the deprotonation of Glu208, a gating residue, which in turn reinforces its interactions with AdiC, leading to longer residence times of Arg+ in the binding site. Although the total electric charge of the ligand appears to be the determinant factor in the discrimination process, two local interactions formed with Trp293, another gating residue of the binding site, also contribute to the selection mechanism: a cation-π interaction with the guanidinium group of Arg+ and an anion-π interaction involving Glu208.Eva-Maria KrammerAndrew GibbonsGoedele RoosMartine PrévostNature PortfolioarticleGating ResiduesDivalent CompoundsAgmatineDivalent LigandSolvation Free EnergyMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Gating Residues
Divalent Compounds
Agmatine
Divalent Ligand
Solvation Free Energy
Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Gating Residues
Divalent Compounds
Agmatine
Divalent Ligand
Solvation Free Energy
Medicine
R
Science
Q
Eva-Maria Krammer
Andrew Gibbons
Goedele Roos
Martine Prévost
Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC
description Abstract The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be selectively bound by AdiC for transport into the cytosol. In this study, we shed light on the mechanism through which AdiC distinguishes Arg+ from Arg2+ of arginine by investigating the binding of both forms in addition to that of divalent agmatine, using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations with molecular and quantum mechanics calculations. We show that AdiC indeed preferentially binds Arg+. The weaker binding of divalent compounds results mostly from their greater tendency to remain hydrated than Arg+. Our data suggests that the binding of Arg+ promotes the deprotonation of Glu208, a gating residue, which in turn reinforces its interactions with AdiC, leading to longer residence times of Arg+ in the binding site. Although the total electric charge of the ligand appears to be the determinant factor in the discrimination process, two local interactions formed with Trp293, another gating residue of the binding site, also contribute to the selection mechanism: a cation-π interaction with the guanidinium group of Arg+ and an anion-π interaction involving Glu208.
format article
author Eva-Maria Krammer
Andrew Gibbons
Goedele Roos
Martine Prévost
author_facet Eva-Maria Krammer
Andrew Gibbons
Goedele Roos
Martine Prévost
author_sort Eva-Maria Krammer
title Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC
title_short Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC
title_full Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC
title_fullStr Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC
title_full_unstemmed Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC
title_sort molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine antiporter adic
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/f35d040aaaeb4c38b8190e9b448e6738
work_keys_str_mv AT evamariakrammer molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic
AT andrewgibbons molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic
AT goedeleroos molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic
AT martineprevost molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic
_version_ 1718388227503554560