Latent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an FMRI study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.

Although we can only report about what is in the focus of our attention, much more than that is actually processed. And even when attended, stimuli may not always be reportable, for instance when they are masked. A stimulus can thus be unreportable for different reasons: the absence of attention or...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Julia D I Meuwese, H Steven Scholte, Victor A F Lamme
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f36e61b06afd4435b7d4182aa5ed1a5b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f36e61b06afd4435b7d4182aa5ed1a5b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f36e61b06afd4435b7d4182aa5ed1a5b2021-11-18T08:29:25ZLatent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an FMRI study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0090098https://doaj.org/article/f36e61b06afd4435b7d4182aa5ed1a5b2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24603676/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Although we can only report about what is in the focus of our attention, much more than that is actually processed. And even when attended, stimuli may not always be reportable, for instance when they are masked. A stimulus can thus be unreportable for different reasons: the absence of attention or the absence of a conscious percept. But to what extent does the brain learn from exposure to these unreportable stimuli? In this fMRI experiment subjects were exposed to textured figure-ground stimuli, of which reportability was manipulated either by masking (which only interferes with consciousness) or with an inattention paradigm (which only interferes with attention). One day later learning was assessed neurally and behaviorally. Positive neural learning effects were found for stimuli presented in the inattention paradigm; for attended yet masked stimuli negative adaptation effects were found. Interestingly, these inattentional learning effects only became apparent in a second session after a behavioral detection task had been administered during which performance feedback was provided. This suggests that the memory trace that is formed during inattention is latent until reactivated by behavioral practice. However, no behavioral learning effects were found, therefore we cannot conclude that perceptual learning has taken place for these unattended stimuli.Julia D I MeuweseH Steven ScholteVictor A F LammePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 3, p e90098 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Julia D I Meuwese
H Steven Scholte
Victor A F Lamme
Latent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an FMRI study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.
description Although we can only report about what is in the focus of our attention, much more than that is actually processed. And even when attended, stimuli may not always be reportable, for instance when they are masked. A stimulus can thus be unreportable for different reasons: the absence of attention or the absence of a conscious percept. But to what extent does the brain learn from exposure to these unreportable stimuli? In this fMRI experiment subjects were exposed to textured figure-ground stimuli, of which reportability was manipulated either by masking (which only interferes with consciousness) or with an inattention paradigm (which only interferes with attention). One day later learning was assessed neurally and behaviorally. Positive neural learning effects were found for stimuli presented in the inattention paradigm; for attended yet masked stimuli negative adaptation effects were found. Interestingly, these inattentional learning effects only became apparent in a second session after a behavioral detection task had been administered during which performance feedback was provided. This suggests that the memory trace that is formed during inattention is latent until reactivated by behavioral practice. However, no behavioral learning effects were found, therefore we cannot conclude that perceptual learning has taken place for these unattended stimuli.
format article
author Julia D I Meuwese
H Steven Scholte
Victor A F Lamme
author_facet Julia D I Meuwese
H Steven Scholte
Victor A F Lamme
author_sort Julia D I Meuwese
title Latent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an FMRI study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.
title_short Latent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an FMRI study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.
title_full Latent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an FMRI study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.
title_fullStr Latent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an FMRI study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.
title_full_unstemmed Latent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an FMRI study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.
title_sort latent memory of unattended stimuli reactivated by practice: an fmri study on the role of consciousness and attention in learning.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/f36e61b06afd4435b7d4182aa5ed1a5b
work_keys_str_mv AT juliadimeuwese latentmemoryofunattendedstimulireactivatedbypracticeanfmristudyontheroleofconsciousnessandattentioninlearning
AT hstevenscholte latentmemoryofunattendedstimulireactivatedbypracticeanfmristudyontheroleofconsciousnessandattentioninlearning
AT victoraflamme latentmemoryofunattendedstimulireactivatedbypracticeanfmristudyontheroleofconsciousnessandattentioninlearning
_version_ 1718421778462670848