A patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Thomas K Mundorf1, Steven H Rauchman2, Robert D Williams3, Ricardo Notivol4, Brinzolamide/Timolol Preference Study Group51Mundorf Eye Center, Charlotte, NC, USA; 2North Valley Eye Medical Group, Mission Hills, CA, USA; 3Taustine Eye Center, Louisville, KY, USA; 4Alcon, Barcelona, Spain; 5Ophthalmolo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas K Mundorf, Steven H Rauchman, Robert D Williams, Ricardo Notivol, Brinzolamide/Timolol Preference Study Group
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f37c185eca5344bea2793e78610b3af8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f37c185eca5344bea2793e78610b3af8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f37c185eca5344bea2793e78610b3af82021-12-02T04:32:07ZA patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/f37c185eca5344bea2793e78610b3af82008-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/a-patient-preference-comparison-of-azargatrade-brinzolamidetimolol-fix-a2370https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Thomas K Mundorf1, Steven H Rauchman2, Robert D Williams3, Ricardo Notivol4, Brinzolamide/Timolol Preference Study Group51Mundorf Eye Center, Charlotte, NC, USA; 2North Valley Eye Medical Group, Mission Hills, CA, USA; 3Taustine Eye Center, Louisville, KY, USA; 4Alcon, Barcelona, Spain; 5Ophthalmology Clinics, USAPurpose: To determine patient preference of and ocular discomfort with fixed combination brinzolamide/timolol compared with fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol.Methods: In a prospective, double-masked, randomized, active-controlled, crossover, multicenter study, patients received 1 drop of brinzolamide/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol in both eyes on consecutive days in random order. Ocular discomfort was rated 1 minute after instillation of each medication, and preference was noted on Day 2. Adverse events, if any, were solicited at each visit.Results: 127 subjects with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Of the 106 subjects who expressed a drug preference, 79.2% preferred brinzolamide/timolol (p < 0.0001). Ocular discomfort scores were significantly higher with dorzolamide/timolol than brinzolamide/timolol (2.9 vs 1.4, respectively; p < 0.0001). Significantly more patients reported ocular pain and discomfort after dorzolamide/timolol instillation and transient blurred vision after brinzolamide/timolol instillation.Conclusions: Patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma preferred the brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination over the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination. This is likely due to the greater ocular discomfort associated with dorzolamide/timolol. The differences in preference, discomfort, and adverse events are likely attributable to formulation differences given the similarities of the active ingredients. Stronger patient preference for brinzolamide/timolol may lead to better therapeutic compliance.Keywords: brinzolamide/timolol, dorzolamide/timolol, patient preference, ocular discomfort, open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension Thomas K MundorfSteven H RauchmanRobert D WilliamsRicardo NotivolBrinzolamide/Timolol Preference Study GroupDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2008, Iss Issue 3, Pp 623-628 (2008)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Thomas K Mundorf
Steven H Rauchman
Robert D Williams
Ricardo Notivol
Brinzolamide/Timolol Preference Study Group
A patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
description Thomas K Mundorf1, Steven H Rauchman2, Robert D Williams3, Ricardo Notivol4, Brinzolamide/Timolol Preference Study Group51Mundorf Eye Center, Charlotte, NC, USA; 2North Valley Eye Medical Group, Mission Hills, CA, USA; 3Taustine Eye Center, Louisville, KY, USA; 4Alcon, Barcelona, Spain; 5Ophthalmology Clinics, USAPurpose: To determine patient preference of and ocular discomfort with fixed combination brinzolamide/timolol compared with fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol.Methods: In a prospective, double-masked, randomized, active-controlled, crossover, multicenter study, patients received 1 drop of brinzolamide/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol in both eyes on consecutive days in random order. Ocular discomfort was rated 1 minute after instillation of each medication, and preference was noted on Day 2. Adverse events, if any, were solicited at each visit.Results: 127 subjects with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Of the 106 subjects who expressed a drug preference, 79.2% preferred brinzolamide/timolol (p < 0.0001). Ocular discomfort scores were significantly higher with dorzolamide/timolol than brinzolamide/timolol (2.9 vs 1.4, respectively; p < 0.0001). Significantly more patients reported ocular pain and discomfort after dorzolamide/timolol instillation and transient blurred vision after brinzolamide/timolol instillation.Conclusions: Patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma preferred the brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination over the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination. This is likely due to the greater ocular discomfort associated with dorzolamide/timolol. The differences in preference, discomfort, and adverse events are likely attributable to formulation differences given the similarities of the active ingredients. Stronger patient preference for brinzolamide/timolol may lead to better therapeutic compliance.Keywords: brinzolamide/timolol, dorzolamide/timolol, patient preference, ocular discomfort, open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
format article
author Thomas K Mundorf
Steven H Rauchman
Robert D Williams
Ricardo Notivol
Brinzolamide/Timolol Preference Study Group
author_facet Thomas K Mundorf
Steven H Rauchman
Robert D Williams
Ricardo Notivol
Brinzolamide/Timolol Preference Study Group
author_sort Thomas K Mundorf
title A patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_short A patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_full A patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_fullStr A patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_full_unstemmed A patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_sort patient preference comparison of azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2008
url https://doaj.org/article/f37c185eca5344bea2793e78610b3af8
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaskmundorf apatientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT stevenhrauchman apatientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT robertdwilliams apatientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT ricardonotivol apatientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT brinzolamidetimololpreferencestudygroup apatientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT thomaskmundorf patientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT stevenhrauchman patientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT robertdwilliams patientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT ricardonotivol patientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT brinzolamidetimololpreferencestudygroup patientpreferencecomparisonofazargaamptradebrinzolamidetimololfixedcombinationvscosoptampregdorzolamidetimololfixedcombinationinpatientswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
_version_ 1718401224183644160