Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation

Introduction: A growing belief that accounting can and should play a role in halting and reversing degradation of ecosystems is leading to conceptual and methodological developments that recognize the cost of degradation, attribute the cost to the entities responsible and assure that entities can’t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sue Ogilvy, Roger Burritt, Dionne Walsh, Carl Obst, Peter Meadows, Peter Muradzikwa, Mark Eigenraam
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f38b0ef79e9b49ccafc56d58d97c0bea
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f38b0ef79e9b49ccafc56d58d97c0bea
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f38b0ef79e9b49ccafc56d58d97c0bea2021-12-02T14:12:26ZAccounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation2096-41292332-887810.1080/20964129.2018.1544837https://doaj.org/article/f38b0ef79e9b49ccafc56d58d97c0bea2018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1544837https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878Introduction: A growing belief that accounting can and should play a role in halting and reversing degradation of ecosystems is leading to conceptual and methodological developments that recognize the cost of degradation, attribute the cost to the entities responsible and assure that entities can’t ignore the economic burden associated with it. Outcome: Demonstration accounts prepared around a scenario where agricultural use of land includes an obligation to maintain ecosystem condition. The accounts are compliant and coherent with both the international accounting standards for individual entities and the United Nations’ System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. Discussion: Accounting for liabilities for ecosystem degradation demonstrates that, where the liability reflects the lost economic value of the ecosystem, the accounts communicate a reduction in the total net worth of the economy and a redistribution of net worth away from the party responsible for the degradation. The inclusion of both liabilities for degradation and the cost of degradation does not lead to double-counting the economic impact of degradation. Conclusion: Accounting principles and frameworks encourage greater accountability for entities responsible for ecosystem condition by providing greater visibility of the economic cost to individual entities, governments and nations.Sue OgilvyRoger BurrittDionne WalshCarl ObstPeter MeadowsPeter MuradzikwaMark EigenraamTaylor & Francis GrouparticleEcosystem accountingliabilitiesdegradationsustainabilitysustainable development goals (SDG)EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcosystem Health and Sustainability, Vol 4, Iss 11, Pp 261-276 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ecosystem accounting
liabilities
degradation
sustainability
sustainable development goals (SDG)
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Ecosystem accounting
liabilities
degradation
sustainability
sustainable development goals (SDG)
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Sue Ogilvy
Roger Burritt
Dionne Walsh
Carl Obst
Peter Meadows
Peter Muradzikwa
Mark Eigenraam
Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation
description Introduction: A growing belief that accounting can and should play a role in halting and reversing degradation of ecosystems is leading to conceptual and methodological developments that recognize the cost of degradation, attribute the cost to the entities responsible and assure that entities can’t ignore the economic burden associated with it. Outcome: Demonstration accounts prepared around a scenario where agricultural use of land includes an obligation to maintain ecosystem condition. The accounts are compliant and coherent with both the international accounting standards for individual entities and the United Nations’ System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. Discussion: Accounting for liabilities for ecosystem degradation demonstrates that, where the liability reflects the lost economic value of the ecosystem, the accounts communicate a reduction in the total net worth of the economy and a redistribution of net worth away from the party responsible for the degradation. The inclusion of both liabilities for degradation and the cost of degradation does not lead to double-counting the economic impact of degradation. Conclusion: Accounting principles and frameworks encourage greater accountability for entities responsible for ecosystem condition by providing greater visibility of the economic cost to individual entities, governments and nations.
format article
author Sue Ogilvy
Roger Burritt
Dionne Walsh
Carl Obst
Peter Meadows
Peter Muradzikwa
Mark Eigenraam
author_facet Sue Ogilvy
Roger Burritt
Dionne Walsh
Carl Obst
Peter Meadows
Peter Muradzikwa
Mark Eigenraam
author_sort Sue Ogilvy
title Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation
title_short Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation
title_full Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation
title_fullStr Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation
title_sort accounting for liabilities related to ecosystem degradation
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/f38b0ef79e9b49ccafc56d58d97c0bea
work_keys_str_mv AT sueogilvy accountingforliabilitiesrelatedtoecosystemdegradation
AT rogerburritt accountingforliabilitiesrelatedtoecosystemdegradation
AT dionnewalsh accountingforliabilitiesrelatedtoecosystemdegradation
AT carlobst accountingforliabilitiesrelatedtoecosystemdegradation
AT petermeadows accountingforliabilitiesrelatedtoecosystemdegradation
AT petermuradzikwa accountingforliabilitiesrelatedtoecosystemdegradation
AT markeigenraam accountingforliabilitiesrelatedtoecosystemdegradation
_version_ 1718391821342605312