A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures

With interdisciplinarity being an important characteristic of contemporary product design, the evaluation of design alternatives also involves multiple disciplines, and the evaluator group usually consists of evaluators from different fields and with obvious heterogeneous characteristics. To effecti...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yukun Hu, Suihuai Yu, Jianjie Chu, Dengkai Chen, Fangmin Cheng, Chen Chen, Zhuo Liu, Ting Wei
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f2021-11-22T01:11:36ZA Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures1687-527310.1155/2021/6992648https://doaj.org/article/f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6992648https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273With interdisciplinarity being an important characteristic of contemporary product design, the evaluation of design alternatives also involves multiple disciplines, and the evaluator group usually consists of evaluators from different fields and with obvious heterogeneous characteristics. To effectively satisfy the heterogeneous needs of evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results, the paper introduces a consensus-reaching approach that incorporates multiple preferences to the evaluation of product design alternatives. First, in order to obtain individual preference information, each evaluator is asked to evaluate all the design alternatives using a preference structure that he/she is familiar with. Second, we use a transfer function to uniform the evaluation information obtained from various preference structures into a complementary judgment matrix. Then, we use the Hybrid Weighted Averaging (HWA) operator weight determination model to aggregate the preference information and obtain the group preference information. Then, we measure the consensus degree between individual evaluators and the group using a consensus measurement method. After that, we use the feedback mechanism to instruct individual evaluators to modify their preferences until a consensus is achieved. We explain the application steps and the feasibility of this approach through the evaluation of the design alternatives of multichannel fluorescence immunochromatography analyzers (MFIAs).Yukun HuSuihuai YuJianjie ChuDengkai ChenFangmin ChengChen ChenZhuo LiuTing WeiHindawi LimitedarticleComputer applications to medicine. Medical informaticsR858-859.7Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
R858-859.7
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Yukun Hu
Suihuai Yu
Jianjie Chu
Dengkai Chen
Fangmin Cheng
Chen Chen
Zhuo Liu
Ting Wei
A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures
description With interdisciplinarity being an important characteristic of contemporary product design, the evaluation of design alternatives also involves multiple disciplines, and the evaluator group usually consists of evaluators from different fields and with obvious heterogeneous characteristics. To effectively satisfy the heterogeneous needs of evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results, the paper introduces a consensus-reaching approach that incorporates multiple preferences to the evaluation of product design alternatives. First, in order to obtain individual preference information, each evaluator is asked to evaluate all the design alternatives using a preference structure that he/she is familiar with. Second, we use a transfer function to uniform the evaluation information obtained from various preference structures into a complementary judgment matrix. Then, we use the Hybrid Weighted Averaging (HWA) operator weight determination model to aggregate the preference information and obtain the group preference information. Then, we measure the consensus degree between individual evaluators and the group using a consensus measurement method. After that, we use the feedback mechanism to instruct individual evaluators to modify their preferences until a consensus is achieved. We explain the application steps and the feasibility of this approach through the evaluation of the design alternatives of multichannel fluorescence immunochromatography analyzers (MFIAs).
format article
author Yukun Hu
Suihuai Yu
Jianjie Chu
Dengkai Chen
Fangmin Cheng
Chen Chen
Zhuo Liu
Ting Wei
author_facet Yukun Hu
Suihuai Yu
Jianjie Chu
Dengkai Chen
Fangmin Cheng
Chen Chen
Zhuo Liu
Ting Wei
author_sort Yukun Hu
title A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures
title_short A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures
title_full A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures
title_fullStr A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures
title_full_unstemmed A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures
title_sort consensus-reaching approach to the evaluation of product design alternatives with multiple preference structures
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f
work_keys_str_mv AT yukunhu aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT suihuaiyu aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT jianjiechu aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT dengkaichen aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT fangmincheng aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT chenchen aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT zhuoliu aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT tingwei aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT yukunhu consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT suihuaiyu consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT jianjiechu consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT dengkaichen consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT fangmincheng consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT chenchen consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT zhuoliu consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
AT tingwei consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures
_version_ 1718418316117147648