A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures
With interdisciplinarity being an important characteristic of contemporary product design, the evaluation of design alternatives also involves multiple disciplines, and the evaluator group usually consists of evaluators from different fields and with obvious heterogeneous characteristics. To effecti...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f2021-11-22T01:11:36ZA Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures1687-527310.1155/2021/6992648https://doaj.org/article/f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6992648https://doaj.org/toc/1687-5273With interdisciplinarity being an important characteristic of contemporary product design, the evaluation of design alternatives also involves multiple disciplines, and the evaluator group usually consists of evaluators from different fields and with obvious heterogeneous characteristics. To effectively satisfy the heterogeneous needs of evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results, the paper introduces a consensus-reaching approach that incorporates multiple preferences to the evaluation of product design alternatives. First, in order to obtain individual preference information, each evaluator is asked to evaluate all the design alternatives using a preference structure that he/she is familiar with. Second, we use a transfer function to uniform the evaluation information obtained from various preference structures into a complementary judgment matrix. Then, we use the Hybrid Weighted Averaging (HWA) operator weight determination model to aggregate the preference information and obtain the group preference information. Then, we measure the consensus degree between individual evaluators and the group using a consensus measurement method. After that, we use the feedback mechanism to instruct individual evaluators to modify their preferences until a consensus is achieved. We explain the application steps and the feasibility of this approach through the evaluation of the design alternatives of multichannel fluorescence immunochromatography analyzers (MFIAs).Yukun HuSuihuai YuJianjie ChuDengkai ChenFangmin ChengChen ChenZhuo LiuTing WeiHindawi LimitedarticleComputer applications to medicine. Medical informaticsR858-859.7Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Vol 2021 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7 Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 |
spellingShingle |
Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7 Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Yukun Hu Suihuai Yu Jianjie Chu Dengkai Chen Fangmin Cheng Chen Chen Zhuo Liu Ting Wei A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures |
description |
With interdisciplinarity being an important characteristic of contemporary product design, the evaluation of design alternatives also involves multiple disciplines, and the evaluator group usually consists of evaluators from different fields and with obvious heterogeneous characteristics. To effectively satisfy the heterogeneous needs of evaluators and improve the credibility of evaluation results, the paper introduces a consensus-reaching approach that incorporates multiple preferences to the evaluation of product design alternatives. First, in order to obtain individual preference information, each evaluator is asked to evaluate all the design alternatives using a preference structure that he/she is familiar with. Second, we use a transfer function to uniform the evaluation information obtained from various preference structures into a complementary judgment matrix. Then, we use the Hybrid Weighted Averaging (HWA) operator weight determination model to aggregate the preference information and obtain the group preference information. Then, we measure the consensus degree between individual evaluators and the group using a consensus measurement method. After that, we use the feedback mechanism to instruct individual evaluators to modify their preferences until a consensus is achieved. We explain the application steps and the feasibility of this approach through the evaluation of the design alternatives of multichannel fluorescence immunochromatography analyzers (MFIAs). |
format |
article |
author |
Yukun Hu Suihuai Yu Jianjie Chu Dengkai Chen Fangmin Cheng Chen Chen Zhuo Liu Ting Wei |
author_facet |
Yukun Hu Suihuai Yu Jianjie Chu Dengkai Chen Fangmin Cheng Chen Chen Zhuo Liu Ting Wei |
author_sort |
Yukun Hu |
title |
A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures |
title_short |
A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures |
title_full |
A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures |
title_fullStr |
A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Consensus-Reaching Approach to the Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives with Multiple Preference Structures |
title_sort |
consensus-reaching approach to the evaluation of product design alternatives with multiple preference structures |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f3986568784c4db59954cec950bed03f |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yukunhu aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT suihuaiyu aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT jianjiechu aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT dengkaichen aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT fangmincheng aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT chenchen aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT zhuoliu aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT tingwei aconsensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT yukunhu consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT suihuaiyu consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT jianjiechu consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT dengkaichen consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT fangmincheng consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT chenchen consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT zhuoliu consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures AT tingwei consensusreachingapproachtotheevaluationofproductdesignalternativeswithmultiplepreferencestructures |
_version_ |
1718418316117147648 |