Numerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process

Abstract We numerically find values of four process input parameters, namely, the argon flow rate, the hydrogen flow rate, the powder feed rate, and the current, that yield the desired mean particles’ temperature and the mean particle velocity (collectively called mean particles’ characteristics, or...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: R. C. Batra, Unchalisa Taetragool
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f3ae290c377a47f4a3bd35047310c2e3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f3ae290c377a47f4a3bd35047310c2e3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f3ae290c377a47f4a3bd35047310c2e32021-12-02T12:33:06ZNumerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process10.1038/s41598-020-78424-w2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/f3ae290c377a47f4a3bd35047310c2e32020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78424-whttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We numerically find values of four process input parameters, namely, the argon flow rate, the hydrogen flow rate, the powder feed rate, and the current, that yield the desired mean particles’ temperature and the mean particle velocity (collectively called mean particles’ characteristics, or MPCs) in an atmospheric plasma spray process just before the particles arrive at the substrate to be coated. Previous studies have shown that the coating quality depends upon the MPCs. The process is simulated by using the software, LAVA-P-3D, that provides MPCs close to their experimental values. Thus, numerical rather than physical experiments are conducted. We first use the design of experiments to characterize the sensitivity of the MPCs to process parameters. We then identify relationships between the significant input parameters and the MPCs by using two methods, namely, the least squares regression and the response surface methodology (RSM). Finally, we employ an optimization algorithm in conjunction with the weighted sum method to find optimum values of the process input variables to achieve desired values of the MPCs. The effects of weights assigned to the objective functions for the temperature and the velocity, and the difference in using the regression and the RSM model have been studied. It is found that these values of the process parameters provide MPCs within 5% of their desired values. This methodology is applicable to other coating processes and fabrication technologies such as hot forging, machining and casting.R. C. BatraUnchalisa TaetragoolNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
R. C. Batra
Unchalisa Taetragool
Numerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process
description Abstract We numerically find values of four process input parameters, namely, the argon flow rate, the hydrogen flow rate, the powder feed rate, and the current, that yield the desired mean particles’ temperature and the mean particle velocity (collectively called mean particles’ characteristics, or MPCs) in an atmospheric plasma spray process just before the particles arrive at the substrate to be coated. Previous studies have shown that the coating quality depends upon the MPCs. The process is simulated by using the software, LAVA-P-3D, that provides MPCs close to their experimental values. Thus, numerical rather than physical experiments are conducted. We first use the design of experiments to characterize the sensitivity of the MPCs to process parameters. We then identify relationships between the significant input parameters and the MPCs by using two methods, namely, the least squares regression and the response surface methodology (RSM). Finally, we employ an optimization algorithm in conjunction with the weighted sum method to find optimum values of the process input variables to achieve desired values of the MPCs. The effects of weights assigned to the objective functions for the temperature and the velocity, and the difference in using the regression and the RSM model have been studied. It is found that these values of the process parameters provide MPCs within 5% of their desired values. This methodology is applicable to other coating processes and fabrication technologies such as hot forging, machining and casting.
format article
author R. C. Batra
Unchalisa Taetragool
author_facet R. C. Batra
Unchalisa Taetragool
author_sort R. C. Batra
title Numerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process
title_short Numerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process
title_full Numerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process
title_fullStr Numerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process
title_full_unstemmed Numerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process
title_sort numerical techniques to find optimal input parameters for achieving mean particles’ temperature and axial velocity in atmospheric plasma spray process
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/f3ae290c377a47f4a3bd35047310c2e3
work_keys_str_mv AT rcbatra numericaltechniquestofindoptimalinputparametersforachievingmeanparticlestemperatureandaxialvelocityinatmosphericplasmasprayprocess
AT unchalisataetragool numericaltechniquestofindoptimalinputparametersforachievingmeanparticlestemperatureandaxialvelocityinatmosphericplasmasprayprocess
_version_ 1718393895309541376