A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme

Background and purpose — The surgical treatment options for severe knee osteoarthritis are unicompartmental (UKR) and total knee replacement (TKR). For patients, functional outcomes are more important than revision rate. We compared the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of both implant types...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasan R Mohammad, Andrew Judge, David W Murray
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f3c5604e31cc4edf90b6eed8bf01c4d3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f3c5604e31cc4edf90b6eed8bf01c4d3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f3c5604e31cc4edf90b6eed8bf01c4d32021-11-26T11:19:48ZA matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme1745-36741745-368210.1080/17453674.2021.1956744https://doaj.org/article/f3c5604e31cc4edf90b6eed8bf01c4d32021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1956744https://doaj.org/toc/1745-3674https://doaj.org/toc/1745-3682Background and purpose — The surgical treatment options for severe knee osteoarthritis are unicompartmental (UKR) and total knee replacement (TKR). For patients, functional outcomes are more important than revision rate. We compared the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of both implant types using a large PROMs dataset. Patients and methods — We analysed a propensity-matched comparison of 38,716 knee replacements (19,358 UKRs and 19,358 TKRs) enrolled in the National Joint Registry and the English National PROM collection programme. Subgroup analyses were performed in different age groups. Results — 6-month postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) for UKR and TKR were 38 (SD 9.4) and 36 (SD 9.4) respectively. A higher proportion of UKRs had an excellent OKS (≥ 41) compared with TKR (47% vs 36%) and a lower proportion of poor OKS (< 27) scores (13% vs. 16%). The 6-month OKS was higher in all age groups for UKR compared with TKR, with the difference increasing in older age groups. The mean 6-month EQ-5D score was 0.78 (SD 0.25) and 0.75 (SD 0.25) respectively. The improvement in EQ-5D resulting from surgery was higher for UKR than TKR both overall and in all age groups. All comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Interpretation — UKR had a greater proportion of excellent OKS scores and lower proportion of poor scores than TKR. Additionally, the quality of life was higher for UKR compared with TKR. These factors should be balanced against the higher revision rate for UKR when choosing which procedure to perform.Hasan R MohammadAndrew JudgeDavid W MurrayTaylor & Francis GrouparticleOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811ENActa Orthopaedica, Vol 92, Iss 6, Pp 701-708 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
spellingShingle Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
Hasan R Mohammad
Andrew Judge
David W Murray
A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme
description Background and purpose — The surgical treatment options for severe knee osteoarthritis are unicompartmental (UKR) and total knee replacement (TKR). For patients, functional outcomes are more important than revision rate. We compared the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of both implant types using a large PROMs dataset. Patients and methods — We analysed a propensity-matched comparison of 38,716 knee replacements (19,358 UKRs and 19,358 TKRs) enrolled in the National Joint Registry and the English National PROM collection programme. Subgroup analyses were performed in different age groups. Results — 6-month postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) for UKR and TKR were 38 (SD 9.4) and 36 (SD 9.4) respectively. A higher proportion of UKRs had an excellent OKS (≥ 41) compared with TKR (47% vs 36%) and a lower proportion of poor OKS (< 27) scores (13% vs. 16%). The 6-month OKS was higher in all age groups for UKR compared with TKR, with the difference increasing in older age groups. The mean 6-month EQ-5D score was 0.78 (SD 0.25) and 0.75 (SD 0.25) respectively. The improvement in EQ-5D resulting from surgery was higher for UKR than TKR both overall and in all age groups. All comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Interpretation — UKR had a greater proportion of excellent OKS scores and lower proportion of poor scores than TKR. Additionally, the quality of life was higher for UKR compared with TKR. These factors should be balanced against the higher revision rate for UKR when choosing which procedure to perform.
format article
author Hasan R Mohammad
Andrew Judge
David W Murray
author_facet Hasan R Mohammad
Andrew Judge
David W Murray
author_sort Hasan R Mohammad
title A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme
title_short A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme
title_full A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme
title_fullStr A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme
title_full_unstemmed A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England’s National PROM collection programme
title_sort matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the national joint registry of england, northern ireland and isle of man and england’s national prom collection programme
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f3c5604e31cc4edf90b6eed8bf01c4d3
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanrmohammad amatchedcomparisonofthepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresof38716totalandunicompartmentalkneereplacementsananalysisoflinkeddatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandnorthernirelandandisleofmanandenglandsnationalpromcollectionprogramme
AT andrewjudge amatchedcomparisonofthepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresof38716totalandunicompartmentalkneereplacementsananalysisoflinkeddatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandnorthernirelandandisleofmanandenglandsnationalpromcollectionprogramme
AT davidwmurray amatchedcomparisonofthepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresof38716totalandunicompartmentalkneereplacementsananalysisoflinkeddatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandnorthernirelandandisleofmanandenglandsnationalpromcollectionprogramme
AT hasanrmohammad matchedcomparisonofthepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresof38716totalandunicompartmentalkneereplacementsananalysisoflinkeddatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandnorthernirelandandisleofmanandenglandsnationalpromcollectionprogramme
AT andrewjudge matchedcomparisonofthepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresof38716totalandunicompartmentalkneereplacementsananalysisoflinkeddatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandnorthernirelandandisleofmanandenglandsnationalpromcollectionprogramme
AT davidwmurray matchedcomparisonofthepatientreportedoutcomemeasuresof38716totalandunicompartmentalkneereplacementsananalysisoflinkeddatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandnorthernirelandandisleofmanandenglandsnationalpromcollectionprogramme
_version_ 1718409507875323904