Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.

<h4>Background</h4>Routine HIV screening in emergency department (ED) settings may require dedicated personnel. We evaluated the outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV screening when offered by either a member of the ED staff or by an HIV counselor.<h4>Methods</h4>We e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rochelle P Walensky, Bethany L Morris, William M Reichmann, A David Paltiel, Christian Arbelaez, Laurel Donnell-Fink, Jeffrey N Katz, Elena Losina
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f3d43c9b38394272925d2f5a1ab8bf68
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f3d43c9b38394272925d2f5a1ab8bf68
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f3d43c9b38394272925d2f5a1ab8bf682021-12-02T20:11:43ZResource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0025575https://doaj.org/article/f3d43c9b38394272925d2f5a1ab8bf682011-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22022415/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Routine HIV screening in emergency department (ED) settings may require dedicated personnel. We evaluated the outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV screening when offered by either a member of the ED staff or by an HIV counselor.<h4>Methods</h4>We employed a mathematical model to extend data obtained from a randomized clinical trial of provider- vs. counselor-based HIV screening in the ED. We compared the downstream survival, costs, and cost-effectiveness of three HIV screening modalities: 1) no screening program; 2) an ED provider-based program; and 3) an HIV counselor-based program. Trial arm-specific data were used for test offer and acceptance rates (provider offer 36%, acceptance 75%; counselor offer 80%, acceptance 71%). Undiagnosed HIV prevalence (0.4%) and linkage to care rates (80%) were assumed to be equal between the screening modalities. Personnel costs were derived from trial-based resource utilization data. We examined the generalizability of results by conducting sensitivity analyses on offer and acceptance rates, undetected HIV prevalence, and costs.<h4>Results</h4>Estimated HIV screening costs in the provider and counselor arms averaged $8.10 and $31.00 per result received. The Provider strategy (compared to no screening) had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $58,700/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and the Counselor strategy (compared to the Provider strategy) had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $64,500/QALY. Results were sensitive to the relative offer and acceptance rates by strategy and the capacity of providers to target-screen, but were robust to changes in undiagnosed HIV prevalence and programmatic costs.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The cost-effectiveness of provider-based HIV screening in an emergency department setting compares favorably to other US screening programs. Despite its additional cost, counselor-based screening delivers just as much return on investment as provider based-screening. Investment in dedicated HIV screening personnel is justified in situations where ED staff resources may be insufficient to provide comprehensive, sustainable screening services.Rochelle P WalenskyBethany L MorrisWilliam M ReichmannA David PaltielChristian ArbelaezLaurel Donnell-FinkJeffrey N KatzElena LosinaPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 6, Iss 10, p e25575 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Rochelle P Walensky
Bethany L Morris
William M Reichmann
A David Paltiel
Christian Arbelaez
Laurel Donnell-Fink
Jeffrey N Katz
Elena Losina
Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.
description <h4>Background</h4>Routine HIV screening in emergency department (ED) settings may require dedicated personnel. We evaluated the outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV screening when offered by either a member of the ED staff or by an HIV counselor.<h4>Methods</h4>We employed a mathematical model to extend data obtained from a randomized clinical trial of provider- vs. counselor-based HIV screening in the ED. We compared the downstream survival, costs, and cost-effectiveness of three HIV screening modalities: 1) no screening program; 2) an ED provider-based program; and 3) an HIV counselor-based program. Trial arm-specific data were used for test offer and acceptance rates (provider offer 36%, acceptance 75%; counselor offer 80%, acceptance 71%). Undiagnosed HIV prevalence (0.4%) and linkage to care rates (80%) were assumed to be equal between the screening modalities. Personnel costs were derived from trial-based resource utilization data. We examined the generalizability of results by conducting sensitivity analyses on offer and acceptance rates, undetected HIV prevalence, and costs.<h4>Results</h4>Estimated HIV screening costs in the provider and counselor arms averaged $8.10 and $31.00 per result received. The Provider strategy (compared to no screening) had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $58,700/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and the Counselor strategy (compared to the Provider strategy) had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $64,500/QALY. Results were sensitive to the relative offer and acceptance rates by strategy and the capacity of providers to target-screen, but were robust to changes in undiagnosed HIV prevalence and programmatic costs.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The cost-effectiveness of provider-based HIV screening in an emergency department setting compares favorably to other US screening programs. Despite its additional cost, counselor-based screening delivers just as much return on investment as provider based-screening. Investment in dedicated HIV screening personnel is justified in situations where ED staff resources may be insufficient to provide comprehensive, sustainable screening services.
format article
author Rochelle P Walensky
Bethany L Morris
William M Reichmann
A David Paltiel
Christian Arbelaez
Laurel Donnell-Fink
Jeffrey N Katz
Elena Losina
author_facet Rochelle P Walensky
Bethany L Morris
William M Reichmann
A David Paltiel
Christian Arbelaez
Laurel Donnell-Fink
Jeffrey N Katz
Elena Losina
author_sort Rochelle P Walensky
title Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.
title_short Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.
title_full Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.
title_fullStr Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.
title_full_unstemmed Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care HIV screening in the emergency department.
title_sort resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of counselor- vs. provider-based rapid point-of-care hiv screening in the emergency department.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/f3d43c9b38394272925d2f5a1ab8bf68
work_keys_str_mv AT rochellepwalensky resourceutilizationandcosteffectivenessofcounselorvsproviderbasedrapidpointofcarehivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
AT bethanylmorris resourceutilizationandcosteffectivenessofcounselorvsproviderbasedrapidpointofcarehivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
AT williammreichmann resourceutilizationandcosteffectivenessofcounselorvsproviderbasedrapidpointofcarehivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
AT adavidpaltiel resourceutilizationandcosteffectivenessofcounselorvsproviderbasedrapidpointofcarehivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
AT christianarbelaez resourceutilizationandcosteffectivenessofcounselorvsproviderbasedrapidpointofcarehivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
AT laureldonnellfink resourceutilizationandcosteffectivenessofcounselorvsproviderbasedrapidpointofcarehivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
AT jeffreynkatz resourceutilizationandcosteffectivenessofcounselorvsproviderbasedrapidpointofcarehivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
AT elenalosina resourceutilizationandcosteffectivenessofcounselorvsproviderbasedrapidpointofcarehivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
_version_ 1718374918792413184