Clinical establishment of a laboratory developed quantitative HDV PCR assay on the cobas6800 high-throughput system

Background & Aims: Currently available HDV PCR assays are characterized by considerable run-to-run and inter-laboratory variability. Hence, we established a quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay on the open channel of a fully automated PCR platform (cobas6800, Roch...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lisa Sophie Pflüger, Dominik Nörz, Tassilo Volz, Katja Giersch, Annika Giese, Nora Goldmann, Dieter Glebe, Jan-Hendrik Bockmann, Susanne Pfefferle, Maura Dandri, Julian Schulze zur Wiesch, Marc Lütgehetmann
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f3d9aadcae3c49dab7c4fe5a8f856e86
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Background &amp; Aims: Currently available HDV PCR assays are characterized by considerable run-to-run and inter-laboratory variability. Hence, we established a quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay on the open channel of a fully automated PCR platform (cobas6800, Roche) offering improved consistency and reliability. Methods: A primer/probe-set targeting a highly conserved region upstream of the HDV antigen was adapted for use on the cobas6800. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was determined using a dilution panel of the HDV WHO standard (n = 21/dilution). Linearity and inclusivity were tested by preparing 10-fold dilution series of cell culture-derived virus (genotype [GT]1-8; n = 5/dilution). Patient samples containing a variety of bloodborne viral pathogens were tested to confirm exclusivity (n = 60). Results: The LLOD of the HDV utility-channel (HDV_UTC) assay was determined as 3.86 IU/ml (95% CI 2.95–5.05 IU/ml) with a linear range from 10–10ˆ8 IU/ml (GT1). Linear relationships were observed for all HDV GTs with slopes ranging from -3.481 to -4.134 cycles/log and R2 from 0.918 to 0.994. Inter-run and intra-run variability were 0.3 and 0.6 Ct (3xLLOD), respectively. No false-positive results were observed. To evaluate clinical performance, 110 serum samples of anti-HDV-Ab+ patients were analyzed using the HDV_UTC and CE-IVD RoboGene assays. 58/110 and 49/110 samples were concordant positive or negative, respectively (overall agreement 97.3%). Quantitative comparison demonstrated a strong correlation (R2 0.8733; 95% CI 0.8914–0.9609; p value <0.0001). Conclusion: The use of highly automated, sample-to-result solutions for molecular diagnostics holds many inherent benefits over manual workflows, including improved reliability, reproducibility and dynamic scaling of testing capacity. The assay we established showed excellent analytical and clinical performance, with inclusivity for all HDV GTs and a limit of quantification of 10 IU/ml, making it a sensitive new tool for HDV screening and viral load monitoring. Lay summary: The hepatitis delta virus (HDV) causes a severe form of inflammation in the liver. We developed a tool for molecular diagnostics, a polymerase chain reaction HDV assay that showed great performance. It can be used to improve diagnosis of HDV, as well as for monitoring treatment responses. The assay allows for quantification of the virus in the tested samples and is performed on a fully automated platform (cobas6800), which provides various benefits including less hands-on time and excellent comparability of test results.