Clinical Outcomes following Large Vessel Coronary Artery Perforation Treated with Covered Stent Implantation: Comparison between Polytetrafluoroethylene- and Polyurethane-Covered Stents (CRACK-II Registry)

Data on the clinical outcomes comparing synthetic fluorocarbon polymer polytetrafluoroethylene- (PTFE, GraftMaster) and polyurethane- (Papyrus) covered stents (CSs) to seal coronary artery perforations (CAPs) are limited. We aimed to evaluate 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes after PCI complicated...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jerzy Bartuś, Rafał Januszek, Damian Hudziak, Michalina Kołodziejczak, Łukasz Kuźma, Mateusz Tajstra, Tomasz Figatowski, Tomasz Pawłowski, Monika Gruz-Kwapisz, Malwina Smolarek-Nicpoń, Agnieszka Skoczyńska, Brunon Tomasiewicz, Adrian Włodarczak, Jan Kulczycki, Krzysztof Plens, Miłosz Jaguszewski, Sławomir Dobrzycki, Andrzej Ochała, Mariusz Gąsior, Krzysztof Reczuch, Stanisław Bartuś, Wojciech Wojakowski, Wojciech Wańha
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	coronary artery perforation clinical outcomes covered stents PTFE and polyurethane stent comparison Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f3e3fc2292214d9d9cfb98308ae43762
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Sea el primero en dejar un comentario!

Clinical Outcomes following Large Vessel Coronary Artery Perforation Treated with Covered Stent Implantation: Comparison between Polytetrafluoroethylene- and Polyurethane-Covered Stents (CRACK-II Registry)

Ejemplares similares