A Comparative Study of Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Permeability Coefficient of Soil

Determination of the permeability coefficient (K) of soil is considered as one of the essential steps to assess infiltration, runoff, groundwater, and drainage in the design process of the construction projects. In this study, three cost-effective algorithms, namely, artificial neural network (ANN),...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binh Thai Pham, Manh Duc Nguyen, Nadhir Al-Ansari, Quoc Anh Tran, Lanh Si Ho, Hiep Van Le, Indra Prakash
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f3fd6398612e4faaa6c78da25976c565
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f3fd6398612e4faaa6c78da25976c565
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f3fd6398612e4faaa6c78da25976c5652021-11-29T00:56:31ZA Comparative Study of Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Permeability Coefficient of Soil1563-514710.1155/2021/7631493https://doaj.org/article/f3fd6398612e4faaa6c78da25976c5652021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7631493https://doaj.org/toc/1563-5147Determination of the permeability coefficient (K) of soil is considered as one of the essential steps to assess infiltration, runoff, groundwater, and drainage in the design process of the construction projects. In this study, three cost-effective algorithms, namely, artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF), which are well-known as advanced machine learning techniques, were used to predict the permeability coefficient (K) of soil (10−9 cm/s), based on a set of simple six input parameters such as natural water content w (%), void ratio (e), specific density (g/cm3), liquid limit (LL) (%), plastic limit (PL) (%), and clay content (%). For this, a total of 84 soil samples data collected from the detailed design stage investigations of Da Nang-Quang Ngai national road project in Vietnam was used to generate training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets for building and validating the models. Statistical error indicators such as RMSE and MAE and correlation coefficient (R) were used to evaluate and compare performance of the models. The results show that all the three models performed well (R > 0.8) for the prediction of permeability coefficient of soil, but the RF model (RMSE = 0.0084, MAE = 0.0049, and R = 0.851) is more efficient compared with the other two models, namely, ANN (RMSE = 0.001, MAE = 0.005, and R = 0.845) and SVM (RMSE = 0.0098, MAE = 0.0064, and R = 0.844). Thus, it can be concluded that the RF model can be used for accurate estimation of the permeability coefficient (K) of the soil.Binh Thai PhamManh Duc NguyenNadhir Al-AnsariQuoc Anh TranLanh Si HoHiep Van LeIndra PrakashHindawi LimitedarticleEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MathematicsQA1-939ENMathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Mathematics
QA1-939
spellingShingle Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Mathematics
QA1-939
Binh Thai Pham
Manh Duc Nguyen
Nadhir Al-Ansari
Quoc Anh Tran
Lanh Si Ho
Hiep Van Le
Indra Prakash
A Comparative Study of Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Permeability Coefficient of Soil
description Determination of the permeability coefficient (K) of soil is considered as one of the essential steps to assess infiltration, runoff, groundwater, and drainage in the design process of the construction projects. In this study, three cost-effective algorithms, namely, artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF), which are well-known as advanced machine learning techniques, were used to predict the permeability coefficient (K) of soil (10−9 cm/s), based on a set of simple six input parameters such as natural water content w (%), void ratio (e), specific density (g/cm3), liquid limit (LL) (%), plastic limit (PL) (%), and clay content (%). For this, a total of 84 soil samples data collected from the detailed design stage investigations of Da Nang-Quang Ngai national road project in Vietnam was used to generate training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets for building and validating the models. Statistical error indicators such as RMSE and MAE and correlation coefficient (R) were used to evaluate and compare performance of the models. The results show that all the three models performed well (R > 0.8) for the prediction of permeability coefficient of soil, but the RF model (RMSE = 0.0084, MAE = 0.0049, and R = 0.851) is more efficient compared with the other two models, namely, ANN (RMSE = 0.001, MAE = 0.005, and R = 0.845) and SVM (RMSE = 0.0098, MAE = 0.0064, and R = 0.844). Thus, it can be concluded that the RF model can be used for accurate estimation of the permeability coefficient (K) of the soil.
format article
author Binh Thai Pham
Manh Duc Nguyen
Nadhir Al-Ansari
Quoc Anh Tran
Lanh Si Ho
Hiep Van Le
Indra Prakash
author_facet Binh Thai Pham
Manh Duc Nguyen
Nadhir Al-Ansari
Quoc Anh Tran
Lanh Si Ho
Hiep Van Le
Indra Prakash
author_sort Binh Thai Pham
title A Comparative Study of Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Permeability Coefficient of Soil
title_short A Comparative Study of Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Permeability Coefficient of Soil
title_full A Comparative Study of Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Permeability Coefficient of Soil
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Permeability Coefficient of Soil
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Permeability Coefficient of Soil
title_sort comparative study of soft computing models for prediction of permeability coefficient of soil
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f3fd6398612e4faaa6c78da25976c565
work_keys_str_mv AT binhthaipham acomparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT manhducnguyen acomparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT nadhiralansari acomparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT quocanhtran acomparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT lanhsiho acomparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT hiepvanle acomparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT indraprakash acomparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT binhthaipham comparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT manhducnguyen comparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT nadhiralansari comparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT quocanhtran comparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT lanhsiho comparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT hiepvanle comparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
AT indraprakash comparativestudyofsoftcomputingmodelsforpredictionofpermeabilitycoefficientofsoil
_version_ 1718407745384742912