An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning

  On the one hand, a growing amount of research discusses support for improving online collaborative learning quality, and many indicators are focused to assess its success. On the other hand, thinkLets for designing reputable and valuable collaborative processes have been developed for more than...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xusen Cheng, Xueyin Wang, Jianqing Huang, Alex Zarifis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f400c2cd5b924022abbf49991cf20a67
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f400c2cd5b924022abbf49991cf20a67
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f400c2cd5b924022abbf49991cf20a672021-12-02T18:03:24ZAn Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning10.19173/irrodl.v17i1.21101492-3831https://doaj.org/article/f400c2cd5b924022abbf49991cf20a672016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2110https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831   On the one hand, a growing amount of research discusses support for improving online collaborative learning quality, and many indicators are focused to assess its success. On the other hand, thinkLets for designing reputable and valuable collaborative processes have been developed for more than ten years. However, few studies try to apply thinkLets to online collaborative learning. This paper introduces thinkLets to online collaborative learning and experimentally tests its effectiveness with participants responces on their satisfaction. Yield Shift Theory (YST), a causal theory explaining inner satisfaction, is adopted. In the experiment, 113 students from Universities in Beijing, China are chosen as a sample. They were divided into two groups, collaborating online in a simulated class. Then, YST in student groups under online collaborative learning is validated, comparison study of online collaborative learning with and without thinkLets is implemented and satisfaction response of participants are analyzed. As a result of this comparison, YST is proved applicable in this context, and satisfaction is higher in online collaborative learning with thinkLets.   Xusen ChengXueyin WangJianqing HuangAlex ZarifisAthabasca University Pressarticleonline collaborative learningonline collaborationsatisfactionthinkLetscollaborative processSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 17, Iss 1 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic online collaborative learning
online collaboration
satisfaction
thinkLets
collaborative process
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle online collaborative learning
online collaboration
satisfaction
thinkLets
collaborative process
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Xusen Cheng
Xueyin Wang
Jianqing Huang
Alex Zarifis
An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning
description   On the one hand, a growing amount of research discusses support for improving online collaborative learning quality, and many indicators are focused to assess its success. On the other hand, thinkLets for designing reputable and valuable collaborative processes have been developed for more than ten years. However, few studies try to apply thinkLets to online collaborative learning. This paper introduces thinkLets to online collaborative learning and experimentally tests its effectiveness with participants responces on their satisfaction. Yield Shift Theory (YST), a causal theory explaining inner satisfaction, is adopted. In the experiment, 113 students from Universities in Beijing, China are chosen as a sample. They were divided into two groups, collaborating online in a simulated class. Then, YST in student groups under online collaborative learning is validated, comparison study of online collaborative learning with and without thinkLets is implemented and satisfaction response of participants are analyzed. As a result of this comparison, YST is proved applicable in this context, and satisfaction is higher in online collaborative learning with thinkLets.  
format article
author Xusen Cheng
Xueyin Wang
Jianqing Huang
Alex Zarifis
author_facet Xusen Cheng
Xueyin Wang
Jianqing Huang
Alex Zarifis
author_sort Xusen Cheng
title An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning
title_short An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning
title_full An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning
title_fullStr An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning
title_full_unstemmed An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning
title_sort experimental study of satisfaction response: evaluation of online collaborative learning
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/f400c2cd5b924022abbf49991cf20a67
work_keys_str_mv AT xusencheng anexperimentalstudyofsatisfactionresponseevaluationofonlinecollaborativelearning
AT xueyinwang anexperimentalstudyofsatisfactionresponseevaluationofonlinecollaborativelearning
AT jianqinghuang anexperimentalstudyofsatisfactionresponseevaluationofonlinecollaborativelearning
AT alexzarifis anexperimentalstudyofsatisfactionresponseevaluationofonlinecollaborativelearning
AT xusencheng experimentalstudyofsatisfactionresponseevaluationofonlinecollaborativelearning
AT xueyinwang experimentalstudyofsatisfactionresponseevaluationofonlinecollaborativelearning
AT jianqinghuang experimentalstudyofsatisfactionresponseevaluationofonlinecollaborativelearning
AT alexzarifis experimentalstudyofsatisfactionresponseevaluationofonlinecollaborativelearning
_version_ 1718378785004322816