Potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal

The study area comprises Faxinal Maua and Sierra municipalities, and presents a geodiversal landscape framework liable to cartographic and analysis from geossistemic principles. The differential resistance of lithologies permitted the formation of relief variety ways with superficial surface with un...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Susana Volkmer, Edison Fortes
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR PT
Publicado:	Confins 2017
Materias:	landscape units geodiversity potentialities and restrictions Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f41073d0101543169390afe3e1211178
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f41073d0101543169390afe3e1211178
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f41073d0101543169390afe3e12111782021-12-02T10:57:05ZPotencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal1958-921210.4000/confins.12633https://doaj.org/article/f41073d0101543169390afe3e12111782017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/confins/12633https://doaj.org/toc/1958-9212The study area comprises Faxinal Maua and Sierra municipalities, and presents a geodiversal landscape framework liable to cartographic and analysis from geossistemic principles. The differential resistance of lithologies permitted the formation of relief variety ways with superficial surface with unconsolidated newer formations associated to relief compartments. The exploitation of these anthropogenic landscapes, which occurred since the 1930s, have been made based on the agricultural exploitation, but in a different way as the potentials and limitations of each landscape system. We identified and classified three landscape systems (SP I, II and III), besides associated subunit landscapes: SP Ia,b,c,d SP IIa,b and SPIIIa,b,c. The Landscape System I is the one that presents the greatest potentialities for use and occupation, due to a model of exploration of the territory made possible by the soil fertility and a relief of low slope. The Landscape System II presents the greatest restrictions of use and occupation, since it comprises the most declining areas and subject to mass movements. The Landscape System III, in spite of being more favourable to exploitation, requires care in the use and occupation, due to the more friable conditions of the soil, highly favourable to erosion.Susana VolkmerEdison FortesConfinsarticlelandscape unitsgeodiversity potentialities and restrictionsGeography. Anthropology. RecreationGENFRPTConfins, Vol 33 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR PT
topic	landscape units geodiversity potentialities and restrictions Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G
spellingShingle	landscape units geodiversity potentialities and restrictions Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Susana Volkmer Edison Fortes Potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal
description	The study area comprises Faxinal Maua and Sierra municipalities, and presents a geodiversal landscape framework liable to cartographic and analysis from geossistemic principles. The differential resistance of lithologies permitted the formation of relief variety ways with superficial surface with unconsolidated newer formations associated to relief compartments. The exploitation of these anthropogenic landscapes, which occurred since the 1930s, have been made based on the agricultural exploitation, but in a different way as the potentials and limitations of each landscape system. We identified and classified three landscape systems (SP I, II and III), besides associated subunit landscapes: SP Ia,b,c,d SP IIa,b and SPIIIa,b,c. The Landscape System I is the one that presents the greatest potentialities for use and occupation, due to a model of exploration of the territory made possible by the soil fertility and a relief of low slope. The Landscape System II presents the greatest restrictions of use and occupation, since it comprises the most declining areas and subject to mass movements. The Landscape System III, in spite of being more favourable to exploitation, requires care in the use and occupation, due to the more friable conditions of the soil, highly favourable to erosion.
format	article
author	Susana Volkmer Edison Fortes
author_facet	Susana Volkmer Edison Fortes
author_sort	Susana Volkmer
title	Potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal
title_short	Potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal
title_full	Potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal
title_fullStr	Potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal
title_full_unstemmed	Potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal
title_sort	potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de mauá da serra e faxinal
publisher	Confins
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/f41073d0101543169390afe3e1211178
work_keys_str_mv	AT susanavolkmer potencialidadesgeoambientaisedinamicadaspaisagensdebordasplanalticasocasodosmunicipiosdemauadaserraefaxinal AT edisonfortes potencialidadesgeoambientaisedinamicadaspaisagensdebordasplanalticasocasodosmunicipiosdemauadaserraefaxinal
_version_	1718396441100025856

Potencialidades geoambientais e dinâmica das paisagens de bordas planálticas – o caso dos municípios de Mauá da Serra e Faxinal

Ejemplares similares