Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.

When estimating the influence of sentence complexity on reading, researchers typically opt for one of two main approaches: Measuring syntactic complexity (SC) or transitional probability (TP). Comparisons of the predictive power of both approaches have yielded mixed results. To address this inconsis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bob Kapteijns, Florian Hintz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f42f9cebcfef48448b5ba94a975ab2ad
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f42f9cebcfef48448b5ba94a975ab2ad
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f42f9cebcfef48448b5ba94a975ab2ad2021-12-02T20:15:26ZComparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0254546https://doaj.org/article/f42f9cebcfef48448b5ba94a975ab2ad2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254546https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203When estimating the influence of sentence complexity on reading, researchers typically opt for one of two main approaches: Measuring syntactic complexity (SC) or transitional probability (TP). Comparisons of the predictive power of both approaches have yielded mixed results. To address this inconsistency, we conducted a self-paced reading experiment. Participants read sentences of varying syntactic complexity. From two alternatives, we selected the set of SC and TP measures, respectively, that provided the best fit to the self-paced reading data. We then compared the contributions of the SC and TP measures to self-paced reading times when entered into the same model. Our results showed that while both measures explained significant portions of variance in reading times (over and above control variables: word/sentence length, word frequency and word position) when included in independent models, their contributions changed drastically when SC and TP were entered into the same model. Specifically, we only observed significant effects of TP. We conclude that in our experiment the control variables explained the bulk of variance. When comparing the small effects of SC and TP, the effects of TP appear to be more robust.Bob KapteijnsFlorian HintzPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0254546 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Bob Kapteijns
Florian Hintz
Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.
description When estimating the influence of sentence complexity on reading, researchers typically opt for one of two main approaches: Measuring syntactic complexity (SC) or transitional probability (TP). Comparisons of the predictive power of both approaches have yielded mixed results. To address this inconsistency, we conducted a self-paced reading experiment. Participants read sentences of varying syntactic complexity. From two alternatives, we selected the set of SC and TP measures, respectively, that provided the best fit to the self-paced reading data. We then compared the contributions of the SC and TP measures to self-paced reading times when entered into the same model. Our results showed that while both measures explained significant portions of variance in reading times (over and above control variables: word/sentence length, word frequency and word position) when included in independent models, their contributions changed drastically when SC and TP were entered into the same model. Specifically, we only observed significant effects of TP. We conclude that in our experiment the control variables explained the bulk of variance. When comparing the small effects of SC and TP, the effects of TP appear to be more robust.
format article
author Bob Kapteijns
Florian Hintz
author_facet Bob Kapteijns
Florian Hintz
author_sort Bob Kapteijns
title Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.
title_short Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.
title_full Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.
title_fullStr Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.
title_sort comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f42f9cebcfef48448b5ba94a975ab2ad
work_keys_str_mv AT bobkapteijns comparingpredictorsofsentenceselfpacedreadingtimessyntacticcomplexityversustransitionalprobabilitymetrics
AT florianhintz comparingpredictorsofsentenceselfpacedreadingtimessyntacticcomplexityversustransitionalprobabilitymetrics
_version_ 1718374620346712064