Assessing University and Programme Experiences: Towards an Integrated Asia Pacific Approach

Effective assessment of university experiences is critical for quality assurance/enhancement but fragmented across the Pacific-Asian universities. A shared conceptual and measurement foundation for understanding student experiences is a necessary first step for inter-institutional communication acro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luke Kutszik Fryer, Lily Min Zeng, Yue Zhao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
SEM
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f45ef055f8af4bb7aec15472f711fe7a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f45ef055f8af4bb7aec15472f711fe7a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f45ef055f8af4bb7aec15472f711fe7a2021-12-01T06:14:40ZAssessing University and Programme Experiences: Towards an Integrated Asia Pacific Approach2504-284X10.3389/feduc.2021.748590https://doaj.org/article/f45ef055f8af4bb7aec15472f711fe7a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.748590/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2504-284XEffective assessment of university experiences is critical for quality assurance/enhancement but fragmented across the Pacific-Asian universities. A shared conceptual and measurement foundation for understanding student experiences is a necessary first step for inter-institutional communication across the region. The current study is a first step toward such a foundation, uniting two of the most internationally and locally prominent instruments: Chinese College Student Survey (university engagement; Mainland China) and Student Learning Experience Questionnaire (programme engagement; Hong Kong). The survey was completed by students from one research-intensive Hong Kong university (n = 539). Random, split-half CFA, latent-reliability, pair-wise correlations, ANOVA (gender) and MANOVA (faculty) were conducted. Factor-structure (good CFA fit for the test/retest) and scale reliability (0.07 > Raykov’s Rho) suggested a robust, short (63-items) survey resulted. Intra-/inter-survey relationships were consistent with the existing Student Engagement and Student Approaches to Learning theory. ANOVA indicated small differences for gender for a few latent constructs, but MANOVA revealed substantial differences across the 10 faculties. This study resulted in a robust Pacific-Asian intra-/inter-institutional student experience instrument which brings together two equally important perspectives on the student experience. This comprehensive student engagement instrument stands ready for cross-national and longitudinal tests. The new instrument’s benefits extend to theoretical connections to student experience assessment in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom enabling international connections to be made.Luke Kutszik FryerLily Min ZengYue ZhaoFrontiers Media S.A.articlestudent experiencePacific Asiaprogramme evaluationuniversity engagementSEMEducation (General)L7-991ENFrontiers in Education, Vol 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic student experience
Pacific Asia
programme evaluation
university engagement
SEM
Education (General)
L7-991
spellingShingle student experience
Pacific Asia
programme evaluation
university engagement
SEM
Education (General)
L7-991
Luke Kutszik Fryer
Lily Min Zeng
Yue Zhao
Assessing University and Programme Experiences: Towards an Integrated Asia Pacific Approach
description Effective assessment of university experiences is critical for quality assurance/enhancement but fragmented across the Pacific-Asian universities. A shared conceptual and measurement foundation for understanding student experiences is a necessary first step for inter-institutional communication across the region. The current study is a first step toward such a foundation, uniting two of the most internationally and locally prominent instruments: Chinese College Student Survey (university engagement; Mainland China) and Student Learning Experience Questionnaire (programme engagement; Hong Kong). The survey was completed by students from one research-intensive Hong Kong university (n = 539). Random, split-half CFA, latent-reliability, pair-wise correlations, ANOVA (gender) and MANOVA (faculty) were conducted. Factor-structure (good CFA fit for the test/retest) and scale reliability (0.07 > Raykov’s Rho) suggested a robust, short (63-items) survey resulted. Intra-/inter-survey relationships were consistent with the existing Student Engagement and Student Approaches to Learning theory. ANOVA indicated small differences for gender for a few latent constructs, but MANOVA revealed substantial differences across the 10 faculties. This study resulted in a robust Pacific-Asian intra-/inter-institutional student experience instrument which brings together two equally important perspectives on the student experience. This comprehensive student engagement instrument stands ready for cross-national and longitudinal tests. The new instrument’s benefits extend to theoretical connections to student experience assessment in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom enabling international connections to be made.
format article
author Luke Kutszik Fryer
Lily Min Zeng
Yue Zhao
author_facet Luke Kutszik Fryer
Lily Min Zeng
Yue Zhao
author_sort Luke Kutszik Fryer
title Assessing University and Programme Experiences: Towards an Integrated Asia Pacific Approach
title_short Assessing University and Programme Experiences: Towards an Integrated Asia Pacific Approach
title_full Assessing University and Programme Experiences: Towards an Integrated Asia Pacific Approach
title_fullStr Assessing University and Programme Experiences: Towards an Integrated Asia Pacific Approach
title_full_unstemmed Assessing University and Programme Experiences: Towards an Integrated Asia Pacific Approach
title_sort assessing university and programme experiences: towards an integrated asia pacific approach
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f45ef055f8af4bb7aec15472f711fe7a
work_keys_str_mv AT lukekutszikfryer assessinguniversityandprogrammeexperiencestowardsanintegratedasiapacificapproach
AT lilyminzeng assessinguniversityandprogrammeexperiencestowardsanintegratedasiapacificapproach
AT yuezhao assessinguniversityandprogrammeexperiencestowardsanintegratedasiapacificapproach
_version_ 1718405516073369600