The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetab...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sruthi Valluri, Susan M. Mason, Hikaru Hanawa Peterson, Simone A. French, Lisa J. Harnack
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f2021-12-05T12:26:21ZThe impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial10.1186/s12966-021-01223-71479-5868https://doaj.org/article/f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7https://doaj.org/toc/1479-5868Abstract Background The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetables, and restrictions on foods high in added sugar. To date, however, no study has assessed the impact of these interventions on the benefit cycle, a pattern of rapid depletion of SNAP benefits that has been linked to worsening nutrition and health outcomes over the benefit month. Methods Low-income households not currently enrolled in SNAP (n = 249) received benefits every 4 weeks for 12 weeks on a study-specific benefit card. Households were randomized to one of four study arms: 1) incentive (30% incentive for fruits and vegetables purchased with study benefits), 2) restriction (not allowed to buy sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet baked goods, or candy using study benefits), 3) incentive plus restriction, or 4) control (no incentive or restriction). Weekly household food expenditures were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Results Compared to the control group, financial incentives increased fruit and vegetable purchases, but only in the first 2 weeks after benefit disbursement. Restrictions decreased expenditures on foods high in added sugar throughout the benefit month, but the magnitude of the impact decreased as the month progressed. Notably, restrictions mitigated cyclical expenditures. Conclusions Policies to improve nutrition outcomes among SNAP participants should consider including targeted interventions in the second half of the month to address the benefit cycle and attendant nutrition outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02643576 . Retrospectively registered December 22, 2014.Sruthi ValluriSusan M. MasonHikaru Hanawa PetersonSimone A. FrenchLisa J. HarnackBMCarticleSupplemental nutrition assistance programBenefit cycleFinancial incentivesFinancial restrictionsCyclical food expendituresNutritional diseases. Deficiency diseasesRC620-627Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Supplemental nutrition assistance program
Benefit cycle
Financial incentives
Financial restrictions
Cyclical food expenditures
Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases
RC620-627
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Supplemental nutrition assistance program
Benefit cycle
Financial incentives
Financial restrictions
Cyclical food expenditures
Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases
RC620-627
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Sruthi Valluri
Susan M. Mason
Hikaru Hanawa Peterson
Simone A. French
Lisa J. Harnack
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
description Abstract Background The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetables, and restrictions on foods high in added sugar. To date, however, no study has assessed the impact of these interventions on the benefit cycle, a pattern of rapid depletion of SNAP benefits that has been linked to worsening nutrition and health outcomes over the benefit month. Methods Low-income households not currently enrolled in SNAP (n = 249) received benefits every 4 weeks for 12 weeks on a study-specific benefit card. Households were randomized to one of four study arms: 1) incentive (30% incentive for fruits and vegetables purchased with study benefits), 2) restriction (not allowed to buy sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet baked goods, or candy using study benefits), 3) incentive plus restriction, or 4) control (no incentive or restriction). Weekly household food expenditures were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Results Compared to the control group, financial incentives increased fruit and vegetable purchases, but only in the first 2 weeks after benefit disbursement. Restrictions decreased expenditures on foods high in added sugar throughout the benefit month, but the magnitude of the impact decreased as the month progressed. Notably, restrictions mitigated cyclical expenditures. Conclusions Policies to improve nutrition outcomes among SNAP participants should consider including targeted interventions in the second half of the month to address the benefit cycle and attendant nutrition outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02643576 . Retrospectively registered December 22, 2014.
format article
author Sruthi Valluri
Susan M. Mason
Hikaru Hanawa Peterson
Simone A. French
Lisa J. Harnack
author_facet Sruthi Valluri
Susan M. Mason
Hikaru Hanawa Peterson
Simone A. French
Lisa J. Harnack
author_sort Sruthi Valluri
title The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f
work_keys_str_mv AT sruthivalluri theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT susanmmason theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hikaruhanawapeterson theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT simoneafrench theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lisajharnack theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sruthivalluri impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT susanmmason impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hikaruhanawapeterson impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT simoneafrench impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lisajharnack impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718371934514708480