The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetab...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f2021-12-05T12:26:21ZThe impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial10.1186/s12966-021-01223-71479-5868https://doaj.org/article/f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7https://doaj.org/toc/1479-5868Abstract Background The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetables, and restrictions on foods high in added sugar. To date, however, no study has assessed the impact of these interventions on the benefit cycle, a pattern of rapid depletion of SNAP benefits that has been linked to worsening nutrition and health outcomes over the benefit month. Methods Low-income households not currently enrolled in SNAP (n = 249) received benefits every 4 weeks for 12 weeks on a study-specific benefit card. Households were randomized to one of four study arms: 1) incentive (30% incentive for fruits and vegetables purchased with study benefits), 2) restriction (not allowed to buy sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet baked goods, or candy using study benefits), 3) incentive plus restriction, or 4) control (no incentive or restriction). Weekly household food expenditures were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Results Compared to the control group, financial incentives increased fruit and vegetable purchases, but only in the first 2 weeks after benefit disbursement. Restrictions decreased expenditures on foods high in added sugar throughout the benefit month, but the magnitude of the impact decreased as the month progressed. Notably, restrictions mitigated cyclical expenditures. Conclusions Policies to improve nutrition outcomes among SNAP participants should consider including targeted interventions in the second half of the month to address the benefit cycle and attendant nutrition outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02643576 . Retrospectively registered December 22, 2014.Sruthi ValluriSusan M. MasonHikaru Hanawa PetersonSimone A. FrenchLisa J. HarnackBMCarticleSupplemental nutrition assistance programBenefit cycleFinancial incentivesFinancial restrictionsCyclical food expendituresNutritional diseases. Deficiency diseasesRC620-627Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Supplemental nutrition assistance program Benefit cycle Financial incentives Financial restrictions Cyclical food expenditures Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases RC620-627 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 |
spellingShingle |
Supplemental nutrition assistance program Benefit cycle Financial incentives Financial restrictions Cyclical food expenditures Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases RC620-627 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Sruthi Valluri Susan M. Mason Hikaru Hanawa Peterson Simone A. French Lisa J. Harnack The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial |
description |
Abstract Background The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest anti-hunger program in the United States. Two proposed interventions to encourage healthier food expenditures among SNAP participants have generated significant debate: financial incentives for fruits and vegetables, and restrictions on foods high in added sugar. To date, however, no study has assessed the impact of these interventions on the benefit cycle, a pattern of rapid depletion of SNAP benefits that has been linked to worsening nutrition and health outcomes over the benefit month. Methods Low-income households not currently enrolled in SNAP (n = 249) received benefits every 4 weeks for 12 weeks on a study-specific benefit card. Households were randomized to one of four study arms: 1) incentive (30% incentive for fruits and vegetables purchased with study benefits), 2) restriction (not allowed to buy sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet baked goods, or candy using study benefits), 3) incentive plus restriction, or 4) control (no incentive or restriction). Weekly household food expenditures were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Results Compared to the control group, financial incentives increased fruit and vegetable purchases, but only in the first 2 weeks after benefit disbursement. Restrictions decreased expenditures on foods high in added sugar throughout the benefit month, but the magnitude of the impact decreased as the month progressed. Notably, restrictions mitigated cyclical expenditures. Conclusions Policies to improve nutrition outcomes among SNAP participants should consider including targeted interventions in the second half of the month to address the benefit cycle and attendant nutrition outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02643576 . Retrospectively registered December 22, 2014. |
format |
article |
author |
Sruthi Valluri Susan M. Mason Hikaru Hanawa Peterson Simone A. French Lisa J. Harnack |
author_facet |
Sruthi Valluri Susan M. Mason Hikaru Hanawa Peterson Simone A. French Lisa J. Harnack |
author_sort |
Sruthi Valluri |
title |
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/f473549d07014c89bb74c2c8d578169f |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sruthivalluri theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT susanmmason theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hikaruhanawapeterson theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT simoneafrench theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lisajharnack theimpactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sruthivalluri impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT susanmmason impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hikaruhanawapeterson impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT simoneafrench impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lisajharnack impactoffinancialincentivesandrestrictionsoncyclicalfoodexpendituresamonglowincomehouseholdsreceivingnutritionassistancearandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1718371934514708480 |