El Fondo Regional de Solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?Dos respuestas sub-regionales en la Huasteca

Ethnic Identity and Ethnic Political Activity Don’t Necessarily Go Hand in Hand.  Identitary Expressions Among the Teenek and Nahua of the Veracruzan Huasteca. In the Huasteca region, in Mexico’s northeast, two Indians groups, the Nahua and the Teenek, experience the interaction with cultural othern...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brigitte Barthas, Anath Ariel de Vidas
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
PT
Publicado: Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f49f93a9c3094c6b9e4937e43611681a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f49f93a9c3094c6b9e4937e43611681a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f49f93a9c3094c6b9e4937e43611681a2021-12-02T10:35:57ZEl Fondo Regional de Solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?Dos respuestas sub-regionales en la Huasteca1626-0252https://doaj.org/article/f49f93a9c3094c6b9e4937e43611681a2007-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/3297https://doaj.org/toc/1626-0252Ethnic Identity and Ethnic Political Activity Don’t Necessarily Go Hand in Hand.  Identitary Expressions Among the Teenek and Nahua of the Veracruzan Huasteca. In the Huasteca region, in Mexico’s northeast, two Indians groups, the Nahua and the Teenek, experience the interaction with cultural otherness and with modern, national society in very different ways.  This paper compares the Teenek position toward the Other to the one of their nearby Nahua neighbors.  While the Teenek position is more reserved and hermetic, the Nahua position toward the Other is characterized by more active and assertive participation outside their communities.  The cultural strategies of both groups appear to be radically opposed.  Nonetheless, none of these two groups is involved in Indian political militancy and their ethnic identity is expressed in more discrete ways.  The comparison between the two groups help us understand the character of the differentiated interactions of two neighboring ethnic groups with the modern world and national society that may be rooted in each group’s particular worldview and history.  From a theoretical standpoint, this paper addresses the problem of the cultural and social construction of collective identities and Otherness in modern and multicultural societies, proposing to reconstruct the concept of ethnicity from a cognitive perspective rather than as identity politics.Brigitte BarthasAnath Ariel de VidasCentre de Recherches sur les Mondes AméricainsarticleteenekAnthropologyGN1-890Latin America. Spanish AmericaF1201-3799ENFRPTNuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos (2007)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
PT
topic teenek
Anthropology
GN1-890
Latin America. Spanish America
F1201-3799
spellingShingle teenek
Anthropology
GN1-890
Latin America. Spanish America
F1201-3799
Brigitte Barthas
Anath Ariel de Vidas
El Fondo Regional de Solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?Dos respuestas sub-regionales en la Huasteca
description Ethnic Identity and Ethnic Political Activity Don’t Necessarily Go Hand in Hand.  Identitary Expressions Among the Teenek and Nahua of the Veracruzan Huasteca. In the Huasteca region, in Mexico’s northeast, two Indians groups, the Nahua and the Teenek, experience the interaction with cultural otherness and with modern, national society in very different ways.  This paper compares the Teenek position toward the Other to the one of their nearby Nahua neighbors.  While the Teenek position is more reserved and hermetic, the Nahua position toward the Other is characterized by more active and assertive participation outside their communities.  The cultural strategies of both groups appear to be radically opposed.  Nonetheless, none of these two groups is involved in Indian political militancy and their ethnic identity is expressed in more discrete ways.  The comparison between the two groups help us understand the character of the differentiated interactions of two neighboring ethnic groups with the modern world and national society that may be rooted in each group’s particular worldview and history.  From a theoretical standpoint, this paper addresses the problem of the cultural and social construction of collective identities and Otherness in modern and multicultural societies, proposing to reconstruct the concept of ethnicity from a cognitive perspective rather than as identity politics.
format article
author Brigitte Barthas
Anath Ariel de Vidas
author_facet Brigitte Barthas
Anath Ariel de Vidas
author_sort Brigitte Barthas
title El Fondo Regional de Solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?Dos respuestas sub-regionales en la Huasteca
title_short El Fondo Regional de Solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?Dos respuestas sub-regionales en la Huasteca
title_full El Fondo Regional de Solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?Dos respuestas sub-regionales en la Huasteca
title_fullStr El Fondo Regional de Solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?Dos respuestas sub-regionales en la Huasteca
title_full_unstemmed El Fondo Regional de Solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?Dos respuestas sub-regionales en la Huasteca
title_sort el fondo regional de solidaridad ¿para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas?dos respuestas sub-regionales en la huasteca
publisher Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
publishDate 2007
url https://doaj.org/article/f49f93a9c3094c6b9e4937e43611681a
work_keys_str_mv AT brigittebarthas elfondoregionaldesolidaridadparaeldesarrollodelospueblosindigenasdosrespuestassubregionalesenlahuasteca
AT anatharieldevidas elfondoregionaldesolidaridadparaeldesarrollodelospueblosindigenasdosrespuestassubregionalesenlahuasteca
_version_ 1718396979655999488