Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.

<h4>Purpose</h4>Limited work has been performed for the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer surveillance imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between two different DBT implementations in breast cancer surveillance imaging, fo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Andria Hadjipanteli, Petros Polyviou, Ilias Kyriakopoulos, Marios Genagritis, Natasa Kotziamani, Demetris Moniatis, Anne Papoutsou, Anastasia Constantinidou
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/f4bf9a25bf4346eb8bc04523790740ed
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:f4bf9a25bf4346eb8bc04523790740ed
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:f4bf9a25bf4346eb8bc04523790740ed2021-12-02T20:14:03ZComparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256514https://doaj.org/article/f4bf9a25bf4346eb8bc04523790740ed2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256514https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Purpose</h4>Limited work has been performed for the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer surveillance imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between two different DBT implementations in breast cancer surveillance imaging, for patients with a personal history of breast cancer.<h4>Method</h4>The DBT implementations investigated were: (1) 2-view 2D digital mammography and 2-view DBT (2vDM&2vDBT) (2) 1-view (cranial-caudal) DM and 1-view (mediolateral-oblique) DBT (1vDM&1vDBT). Clinical performance of these two implementations was assessed retrospectively using observer studies with 118 sets of real patient images, from a single imaging centre, and six observers. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) using the Jack-knife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) analysis were evaluated.<h4>Results</h4>Results suggest that the two DBT implementations are not significantly different in terms of sensitivity, specificity and AUC. When looking at the two main different lesion types, non-calcifications and calcifications, and two different density levels, no difference in the performance of the two DBT implementations was found.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Since 1vDM&1vDBT exposes the patient to half the dose of 2vDM&2vDBT, it might be worth considering 1vDM&1vDBT in breast cancer surveillance imaging. However, larger studies are required to conclude on this matter.Andria HadjipanteliPetros PolyviouIlias KyriakopoulosMarios GenagritisNatasa KotziamaniDemetris MoniatisAnne PapoutsouAnastasia ConstantinidouPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0256514 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Andria Hadjipanteli Petros Polyviou Ilias Kyriakopoulos Marios Genagritis Natasa Kotziamani Demetris Moniatis Anne Papoutsou Anastasia Constantinidou Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.
description	<h4>Purpose</h4>Limited work has been performed for the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer surveillance imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between two different DBT implementations in breast cancer surveillance imaging, for patients with a personal history of breast cancer.<h4>Method</h4>The DBT implementations investigated were: (1) 2-view 2D digital mammography and 2-view DBT (2vDM&2vDBT) (2) 1-view (cranial-caudal) DM and 1-view (mediolateral-oblique) DBT (1vDM&1vDBT). Clinical performance of these two implementations was assessed retrospectively using observer studies with 118 sets of real patient images, from a single imaging centre, and six observers. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) using the Jack-knife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) analysis were evaluated.<h4>Results</h4>Results suggest that the two DBT implementations are not significantly different in terms of sensitivity, specificity and AUC. When looking at the two main different lesion types, non-calcifications and calcifications, and two different density levels, no difference in the performance of the two DBT implementations was found.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Since 1vDM&1vDBT exposes the patient to half the dose of 2vDM&2vDBT, it might be worth considering 1vDM&1vDBT in breast cancer surveillance imaging. However, larger studies are required to conclude on this matter.
format	article
author	Andria Hadjipanteli Petros Polyviou Ilias Kyriakopoulos Marios Genagritis Natasa Kotziamani Demetris Moniatis Anne Papoutsou Anastasia Constantinidou
author_facet	Andria Hadjipanteli Petros Polyviou Ilias Kyriakopoulos Marios Genagritis Natasa Kotziamani Demetris Moniatis Anne Papoutsou Anastasia Constantinidou
author_sort	Andria Hadjipanteli
title	Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.
title_short	Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.
title_full	Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.
title_fullStr	Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.
title_sort	comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2d-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/f4bf9a25bf4346eb8bc04523790740ed
work_keys_str_mv	AT andriahadjipanteli comparisonoftwoviewversussingleviewdigitalbreasttomosynthesisand2dmammographyinbreastcancersurveillanceimaging AT petrospolyviou comparisonoftwoviewversussingleviewdigitalbreasttomosynthesisand2dmammographyinbreastcancersurveillanceimaging AT iliaskyriakopoulos comparisonoftwoviewversussingleviewdigitalbreasttomosynthesisand2dmammographyinbreastcancersurveillanceimaging AT mariosgenagritis comparisonoftwoviewversussingleviewdigitalbreasttomosynthesisand2dmammographyinbreastcancersurveillanceimaging AT natasakotziamani comparisonoftwoviewversussingleviewdigitalbreasttomosynthesisand2dmammographyinbreastcancersurveillanceimaging AT demetrismoniatis comparisonoftwoviewversussingleviewdigitalbreasttomosynthesisand2dmammographyinbreastcancersurveillanceimaging AT annepapoutsou comparisonoftwoviewversussingleviewdigitalbreasttomosynthesisand2dmammographyinbreastcancersurveillanceimaging AT anastasiaconstantinidou comparisonoftwoviewversussingleviewdigitalbreasttomosynthesisand2dmammographyinbreastcancersurveillanceimaging
_version_	1718374741706801152

Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.

Ejemplares similares