Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview.
<h4>Background</h4>There is considerable debate as to the relative merits of using randomised controlled trial (RCT) data as opposed to observational data in systematic reviews of adverse effects. This meta-analysis of meta-analyses aimed to assess the level of agreement or disagreement...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Su Golder, Yoon K Loke, Martin Bland |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/f5162d59cd6f4b9da41912304cf2f135 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Effectiveness of Medicinal Plants for Glycaemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: An Overview of Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials
por: Merlin L. Willcox, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science.
por: Jan P Vandenbroucke
Publicado: (2008) -
The efficacy and tolerability of 'polypills': meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
por: C Raina Elley, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Systematic differences in effect estimates between observational studies and randomized control trials in meta-analyses in nephrology
por: Miho Kimachi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones: Analysing the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis of powered double-blinded randomised controlled trials
por: Tarik Amer, et al.
Publicado: (2017)