Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.

There is an urgent need for an accurate antibody test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We have developed 3 ELISA methods, trimer spike IgA, trimer spike IgG, and nucleocapsid IgG, for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We evaluated their performance along with fou...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zahra Rikhtegaran Tehrani, Saman Saadat, Ebtehal Saleh, Xin Ouyang, Niel Constantine, Anthony L DeVico, Anthony D Harris, George K Lewis, Shyam Kottilil, Mohammad M Sajadi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f5201487a4cd453aab1a89885fdc7429
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f5201487a4cd453aab1a89885fdc7429
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f5201487a4cd453aab1a89885fdc74292021-12-02T20:11:28ZPerformance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0237828https://doaj.org/article/f5201487a4cd453aab1a89885fdc74292020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237828https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203There is an urgent need for an accurate antibody test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We have developed 3 ELISA methods, trimer spike IgA, trimer spike IgG, and nucleocapsid IgG, for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We evaluated their performance along with four commercial ELISAs, EDI™ Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 ELISA IgG and IgM, Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgG and IgA, and one lateral flow assay, DPP® COVID-19 IgM/IgG System (Chembio). Both sensitivity and specificity were evaluated and the probable causes of false-positive reactions were determined. The assays were evaluated using 300 pre-epidemic samples and 100 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 samples. The sensitivities and specificities of the assays were as follows: 90%/100% (in-house trimer spike IgA), 90%/99.3% (in-house trimer spike IgG), 89%/98.3% (in-house nucleocapsid IgG), 73.7%/100% (EDI nucleocapsid IgM), 84.5%/95.1% (EDI nucleocapsid IgG), 95%/93.7% (Euroimmun S1 IgA), 82.8%/99.7% (Euroimmun S1 IgG), 82.0%/91.7% (Chembio nucleocapsid IgM), 92%/93.3% (Chembio nucleocapsid IgG). The presumed causes of false positive results from pre-epidemic samples in commercial and in-house assays were mixed. In some cases, assays lacked reproducibility. In other cases, reactivity was abrogated by competitive inhibition (spiking the sample with the same antigen that was used for coating ELISAs prior to performing the assay), suggesting positive reaction could be attributed to the presence of antibodies against these antigens. In other cases, reactivity was consistently detected but not abrogated by the spiking, suggesting positive reaction was not attributed to the presence of antibodies against these antigens. Overall, there was wide variability in assay performance using our samples, with in-house tests exhibiting the highest combined sensitivity and specificity. The causes of "false positivity" in pre-epidemic samples may be due to plasma antibodies apparently reacting with the corresponding antigen, or spurious reactivity may be directed against non-specific components in the assay system. Identification of these targets will be essential to improving assay performance.Zahra Rikhtegaran TehraniSaman SaadatEbtehal SalehXin OuyangNiel ConstantineAnthony L DeVicoAnthony D HarrisGeorge K LewisShyam KottililMohammad M SajadiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 11, p e0237828 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Zahra Rikhtegaran Tehrani
Saman Saadat
Ebtehal Saleh
Xin Ouyang
Niel Constantine
Anthony L DeVico
Anthony D Harris
George K Lewis
Shyam Kottilil
Mohammad M Sajadi
Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.
description There is an urgent need for an accurate antibody test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We have developed 3 ELISA methods, trimer spike IgA, trimer spike IgG, and nucleocapsid IgG, for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We evaluated their performance along with four commercial ELISAs, EDI™ Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 ELISA IgG and IgM, Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgG and IgA, and one lateral flow assay, DPP® COVID-19 IgM/IgG System (Chembio). Both sensitivity and specificity were evaluated and the probable causes of false-positive reactions were determined. The assays were evaluated using 300 pre-epidemic samples and 100 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 samples. The sensitivities and specificities of the assays were as follows: 90%/100% (in-house trimer spike IgA), 90%/99.3% (in-house trimer spike IgG), 89%/98.3% (in-house nucleocapsid IgG), 73.7%/100% (EDI nucleocapsid IgM), 84.5%/95.1% (EDI nucleocapsid IgG), 95%/93.7% (Euroimmun S1 IgA), 82.8%/99.7% (Euroimmun S1 IgG), 82.0%/91.7% (Chembio nucleocapsid IgM), 92%/93.3% (Chembio nucleocapsid IgG). The presumed causes of false positive results from pre-epidemic samples in commercial and in-house assays were mixed. In some cases, assays lacked reproducibility. In other cases, reactivity was abrogated by competitive inhibition (spiking the sample with the same antigen that was used for coating ELISAs prior to performing the assay), suggesting positive reaction could be attributed to the presence of antibodies against these antigens. In other cases, reactivity was consistently detected but not abrogated by the spiking, suggesting positive reaction was not attributed to the presence of antibodies against these antigens. Overall, there was wide variability in assay performance using our samples, with in-house tests exhibiting the highest combined sensitivity and specificity. The causes of "false positivity" in pre-epidemic samples may be due to plasma antibodies apparently reacting with the corresponding antigen, or spurious reactivity may be directed against non-specific components in the assay system. Identification of these targets will be essential to improving assay performance.
format article
author Zahra Rikhtegaran Tehrani
Saman Saadat
Ebtehal Saleh
Xin Ouyang
Niel Constantine
Anthony L DeVico
Anthony D Harris
George K Lewis
Shyam Kottilil
Mohammad M Sajadi
author_facet Zahra Rikhtegaran Tehrani
Saman Saadat
Ebtehal Saleh
Xin Ouyang
Niel Constantine
Anthony L DeVico
Anthony D Harris
George K Lewis
Shyam Kottilil
Mohammad M Sajadi
author_sort Zahra Rikhtegaran Tehrani
title Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.
title_short Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.
title_full Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.
title_fullStr Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.
title_full_unstemmed Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.
title_sort performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based sars-cov-2 serologic assays.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/f5201487a4cd453aab1a89885fdc7429
work_keys_str_mv AT zahrarikhtegarantehrani performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT samansaadat performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT ebtehalsaleh performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT xinouyang performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT nielconstantine performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT anthonyldevico performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT anthonydharris performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT georgeklewis performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT shyamkottilil performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
AT mohammadmsajadi performanceofnucleocapsidandspikebasedsarscov2serologicassays
_version_ 1718374919166754816