DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”

Khorasanian thinkers believed that, the discovery of their origins and the "Other", is not a single whole act, but rather a procedural, almost stage-by-stage like capacity to understand the world. Evidence suggests that in order to survive (or just grow), one must move from their initial s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: MGIMO University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f520a174277049aeb1229ccc24e1a03b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f520a174277049aeb1229ccc24e1a03b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f520a174277049aeb1229ccc24e1a03b2021-11-23T14:51:02ZDECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2016-4-49-16-25https://doaj.org/article/f520a174277049aeb1229ccc24e1a03b2016-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/583https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099Khorasanian thinkers believed that, the discovery of their origins and the "Other", is not a single whole act, but rather a procedural, almost stage-by-stage like capacity to understand the world. Evidence suggests that in order to survive (or just grow), one must move from their initial sphere of life/science to the next. Such mobility was influenced heavily by the tradition of constant crossing of boundaries and countries, formalizing commercial/scientific flexibility of the entire culture of the region. However, this potential remains untapped in the construction of the new history of nations. Therefore it is fair to ask: what is the reason for the lack of dialogue on decolonization of, both within the region (between researchers of different republics), between the Russian and Central Asian researchers, as well as between other regions, ie South-to-South (the Middle East, Latin America, India, etc.). Without doubt, every one of us has worthy of alibi. But it is important to understand that today's distancing from the topic in Central Asia; is not an ideological camouflage ala Soviet-style, but rather a preservation of the myth of Westphalia on the priority of national sovereignty. Finding one's way out of this maze created by the rhetoric of the nations and the logic of coloniality (as Kuidjano) is a very real issue. The first step may be to recognize that our very own knowledge base is colonial. Accordingly, the process must begin with ridding ourselves from this state, starting the process of de-coloniality. To initiate such an understanding, the author proposes to use - dahlez, philosophical concept, put forward with a view to the perception of many values of plural-cycle culture of the region, as well as the values of the outside.N. T. Nurulla-KhodzhaevaMGIMO University Pressarticlecentral asiaauthoritycolonialismcolonialityrussiaeuropesubalternInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 4(49), Pp 16-25 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic central asia
authority
colonialism
coloniality
russia
europe
subaltern
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle central asia
authority
colonialism
coloniality
russia
europe
subaltern
International relations
JZ2-6530
N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”
description Khorasanian thinkers believed that, the discovery of their origins and the "Other", is not a single whole act, but rather a procedural, almost stage-by-stage like capacity to understand the world. Evidence suggests that in order to survive (or just grow), one must move from their initial sphere of life/science to the next. Such mobility was influenced heavily by the tradition of constant crossing of boundaries and countries, formalizing commercial/scientific flexibility of the entire culture of the region. However, this potential remains untapped in the construction of the new history of nations. Therefore it is fair to ask: what is the reason for the lack of dialogue on decolonization of, both within the region (between researchers of different republics), between the Russian and Central Asian researchers, as well as between other regions, ie South-to-South (the Middle East, Latin America, India, etc.). Without doubt, every one of us has worthy of alibi. But it is important to understand that today's distancing from the topic in Central Asia; is not an ideological camouflage ala Soviet-style, but rather a preservation of the myth of Westphalia on the priority of national sovereignty. Finding one's way out of this maze created by the rhetoric of the nations and the logic of coloniality (as Kuidjano) is a very real issue. The first step may be to recognize that our very own knowledge base is colonial. Accordingly, the process must begin with ridding ourselves from this state, starting the process of de-coloniality. To initiate such an understanding, the author proposes to use - dahlez, philosophical concept, put forward with a view to the perception of many values of plural-cycle culture of the region, as well as the values of the outside.
format article
author N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
author_facet N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
author_sort N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
title DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”
title_short DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”
title_full DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”
title_fullStr DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”
title_full_unstemmed DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”
title_sort decoloniality of knowledge and intercultural “dahlez”
publisher MGIMO University Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/f520a174277049aeb1229ccc24e1a03b
work_keys_str_mv AT ntnurullakhodzhaeva decolonialityofknowledgeandinterculturaldahlez
_version_ 1718416249625509888