Homonymy in English Language and Means of Its Representation (on Example of Functional Words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)

The phenomenon of homonymy of functional words in modern English is considered. The relevance of the work is that the issues of homonymy, in particular one of functional words, are still controversial and not fully studied. In this paper, an attempt is made to identify some of the main provisions th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: T. S. Ignatyeva, N. A. Antonova
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/f526ebaad35848bd996a98ea6af8f9db
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:f526ebaad35848bd996a98ea6af8f9db
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:f526ebaad35848bd996a98ea6af8f9db2021-12-02T07:58:05ZHomonymy in English Language and Means of Its Representation (on Example of Functional Words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2018-9-20-32https://doaj.org/article/f526ebaad35848bd996a98ea6af8f9db2018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/893https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The phenomenon of homonymy of functional words in modern English is considered. The relevance of the work is that the issues of homonymy, in particular one of functional words, are still controversial and not fully studied. In this paper, an attempt is made to identify some of the main provisions that, in the authors’ opinion, will contribute to the differentiation of functional words into closed series and will help to determine the relationship in which these words can be attributed to these closed systems. The authors believe that the definition of a closed series to which a functional word belongs is associated with a number of difficulties, since, firstly, the category of relativity (relations) is not fully understood and its boundaries are not defined, since subjective judgments can be made on the semantic basis with regard to the differentiation of functional or service words, and secondly, because some words are not in one, but in several closed series. The novelty of the study is seen in the fact that by the example of certain functional words ( what and very ), the authors have shown that they can be homonymous words, and their appearance in the language is not the result of conversion, but the result of splitting of multifunctional words expressing relationships.T. S. IgnatyevaN. A. AntonovaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlehomonymsfunctional wordsconversionsplittingenglishSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 9, Pp 20-32 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic homonyms
functional words
conversion
splitting
english
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
spellingShingle homonyms
functional words
conversion
splitting
english
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
T. S. Ignatyeva
N. A. Antonova
Homonymy in English Language and Means of Its Representation (on Example of Functional Words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)
description The phenomenon of homonymy of functional words in modern English is considered. The relevance of the work is that the issues of homonymy, in particular one of functional words, are still controversial and not fully studied. In this paper, an attempt is made to identify some of the main provisions that, in the authors’ opinion, will contribute to the differentiation of functional words into closed series and will help to determine the relationship in which these words can be attributed to these closed systems. The authors believe that the definition of a closed series to which a functional word belongs is associated with a number of difficulties, since, firstly, the category of relativity (relations) is not fully understood and its boundaries are not defined, since subjective judgments can be made on the semantic basis with regard to the differentiation of functional or service words, and secondly, because some words are not in one, but in several closed series. The novelty of the study is seen in the fact that by the example of certain functional words ( what and very ), the authors have shown that they can be homonymous words, and their appearance in the language is not the result of conversion, but the result of splitting of multifunctional words expressing relationships.
format article
author T. S. Ignatyeva
N. A. Antonova
author_facet T. S. Ignatyeva
N. A. Antonova
author_sort T. S. Ignatyeva
title Homonymy in English Language and Means of Its Representation (on Example of Functional Words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)
title_short Homonymy in English Language and Means of Its Representation (on Example of Functional Words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)
title_full Homonymy in English Language and Means of Its Representation (on Example of Functional Words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)
title_fullStr Homonymy in English Language and Means of Its Representation (on Example of Functional Words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)
title_full_unstemmed Homonymy in English Language and Means of Its Representation (on Example of Functional Words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)
title_sort homonymy in english language and means of its representation (on example of functional words <i>what</i> and <i>very</i>)
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/f526ebaad35848bd996a98ea6af8f9db
work_keys_str_mv AT tsignatyeva homonymyinenglishlanguageandmeansofitsrepresentationonexampleoffunctionalwordsiwhatiandiveryi
AT naantonova homonymyinenglishlanguageandmeansofitsrepresentationonexampleoffunctionalwordsiwhatiandiveryi
_version_ 1718398954273505280